The Controversy Of Apple Products

J.M Beattie, in “Scales of Justice: Defense Counsel and the English Criminal Trial in the Eighteenth and Nineteen Centuries,” investigates the transformations in English criminal law the 1730s and 1836. In his work, Beattie argues that the gradual introduction of defence counsel in criminal trials beginning in the 1730s transformed English criminal legal proceedings by highlighting the defendant’s right to advocacy. Furthermore, Beattie contends that the increase in defence counsel in this same period contributed to, as well as reflected the larger social shift towards recognising inherent defendant legal rights. The one hundred year period of study ends in 1836 with the passing of the Prisoner’s Counsel Act - guaranteeing the right of felony defendants to be represented by counsel in English court rooms.

Revenues are recognized in a net basis and only commissions they retain from each sale are reflected under the company’s financial statements.

(2) Tamanaha, Brian. 2008. “Law”, Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History, St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-0095. Link in Course Readings and Available online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1082436&rec=1&srcabs=1012051

The March 22 hearing on the motions filed in the case of U.S. v. Apple should have concluded in the United States' favor. The United States properly filed a motion to compel Apple to assist the United States government in unlocking an iPhone that was reasonably believed to contain information regarding a terrorist attack that killed 14 people and wounded 21 others. The iPhone belonged to the County of San Bernardino--who consented to having the iPhone searched--and was used by the County's former employee, Syed Farook--who turned out to be the terrorist behind the aforementioned terrorist attack. In his employment contract with the County, Farook also consented to the iPhone being searched. Since this is true, and because terrorism is a serious

Over the mid-year, Apple was offering a little more than half of the worldwide premium cell phones, and Samsung was offering just shy of 25%. By December 2016, those figures had developed to 70% and 17%, separately” (Richardson, 2017).

Resolved, Apple should unlock the iPhone for the FBI. The recent case, Apple Vs. United States, has stirred commotion within the United States and its citizens. After the San Bernardino shootings that killed fourteen people and seriously injured twenty-two, one of the shooter’s iPhone was confiscated by the police. This led to a debate on whether or not the phone should be unlocked. Apple CEO Tim Cook contends that by unlocking the phone, one’s privacy will be violated. On the other hand, the FBI wants Apple to unlock the phone as it might provide essential information. Apple should unlock the iPhone for the FBI as it proves to be the right decision on an economic, realistic, philosophical, and historical basis.

There are various threats in the external environment that influences Apple. Rapid technological development and change is a problem, the company might be set aside by a competitor who invents a newer technology. Tax increases have also influenced Apple. Apple’s profits went down due to new taxes. Patent breaches pose a huge threat, competitors might imitate their technology and make profit on these features. Appreciation of the dollar, Apple’s profits in foreign countries are reduced due to strengthening the dollar. The growing popularity of Android, widespread use of this operating system makes Apple’s infrastructure less attractive for customers. Increasing labor costs in Asia, the protests of workers in Asia, especially Foxconn

I am here to discuss a recent issue that you might know. The San Bernardino shooting and iphone dispute. On December 2nd of 2015, a terrorist group attacked the inland regional center in San Bernardino California, killing 14 and injuring 22. An iphone was left behind by one of the terrorists, which the FBI found and asked Apple to find the iphone’s encryption code and unlock it. I think that this is unconstitutional and that privacy should be protected at all costs.

You’re absolutely correct, Apple has truly mastered the art of generating buzz and obtaining free advertising (Kinicki & Williams, 2013). Over the years they’ve masterfully leveraged secrecy and the art of strategically leaking information to drive customer and media anticipation for their products into the stratosphere (Kinicki & Williams, 2013). Even more impressive is Apple’s ability to consistently capitalize on that buzz by producing products that meet the amazingly high expectations of its customers. Apple’s ability to combine unmatched marketing sizzle with real innovative genius and manufacturing muscle, is what truly makes their products iconic and sets them apart as a company.

What is the relation between an apple and technology? You might have already questioned once you`ve seen Apple`s products. Steve Jobs`s friend had an apple farm, seeing that apple farm made Jobs remember Newton`s story and relate that to his company`s logo. Long time ago Apple`s logo used to be Newton sitting under an apple tree, but by the time Jobs figured that it`s too elaborate and minuscule. Jobs had asked his friend to adjust Apple`s logo and his friend modified it to a bitten apple. To make it clear a bitten apple is a metaphor for the Eden Garden. Jobs has been always a distinctive manager that what we can respond from Apple`s common slogan “Think different”. As an illustration, Apple company always thinks out of the box and it`s usually unique with it`s products. Such companies will not progress and succeed without a great manager. Steve Jobs made a considerable legacy in this world because of his creative thinking, strong aggressiveness, and appreciable contribution.

The company started off as “Apple Computer,” best known for its Macintosh personal computers (PCs) in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Despite a strong brand, rapid growth, and high profits in the late 1980s, Apple almost went bankrupt in 1996 (Kim & Yoffie, 2010, p.1). This can be explained that Apple has become larger and more significant than other competitors put together in 1980. Because Apple failed to innovate in 1996, the company almost went bankruptcy but eventually Steve Jobs took Apple from bad situation to the company that can make billions of dollars through promoted itself as a hip alternative to other computer brands. Apple highlighted its computers as the world’s “greenest lineup of notebooks” that were energy efficient and used recyclable materials. The goal was to differentiate the Macintosh amid intense competition in the PC industry (Kim & Yoffie, p.4).

the overall market share of Samsung is more than 21% whereas apple is still at 13.9% which clearly states that there are still many areas in which Apple Inc. can develop its market and get a good numbers. (corporation, 2015)

This rivalry all began when the former Apple supplier, Samsung, introduced a device shockingly similar to the iPhone. The Galaxy S was considered to be pure piracy by the executives at Apple. The overall design of the phone was almost identical and several patented Apple features such as the “pinch to zoom” feature were essentially stolen. In the months and years that followed, Apple and Samsung would clash on a scale that would cost the two companies more than a billion dollars and bring about millions of pages of legal

Business ethics, social, and environmental guidelines frame the expectations of an organization's stakeholders including customers, employees, and regulatory bodies. An organization's ethical guidelines encompass how the organization and its employees embody ethical principles in their dealings, with each other, and other stakeholders. Therefore, Ferrell, Fraedrich, and Farrell (2008) have defined Business ethics as "The principles and standards that guide behavior in the world of business" (p.6). In many situations, individuals must incorporate their personal ethics to match those of the organization's ethical culture. For this reason, business ethics theory indicates that an organization's ethics are evident in its organizational mission and vision (Hummels & Timmer, 2004). This is because the mission and vision determine organizational structure and culture, and thereby organizational and individual behavior.

Ten years ago, Apple resurrected itself through smart enterprise resource planning. It saw that a successful product like the iPod could serve as a springboard to the company's other products, if the company could develop an integrated product line with an exceptionally high level of functionality. Rather than trying to do everything itself, Apple allowed other firms to develop software and accessories, allowing the market to dictate the types and forms of functionality that it wanted. The result of this, along with strong business intelligence, has been a decade-long run of success where the company has introduced hit after hit, including products like the iPad that many observers had questioned the merits of.