The Controversy Of Experimenting With Single-Sex Classrooms

Single sex schools also break down gender stereotypes (“Advantages”). In coed schools, typically boys tend to overshadow equally talented girls (Mullins). Boys tend act more assertively, aggressively, vying for the teacher’s attention in the classroom, whereas girls tend to participate less due to their subservient attitude in coeducation classrooms. (Hughes). The pressure of a male dominated class may pressure girls into giving up in class. In coed schools, both genders distract each other: The students worry more about how they look than their education (Hughes). In single sex schools, however, students focus more on school than on the opposite sex (Whelan). By separating the sexes, the temptation, embarrassment, and distraction go away. This allows both genders to explore nontraditional disciplines typically not seen in coed schools. Girls take more leadership roles in the classroom, and those who give up in coed classes participate more in single-sex classes (Schultz). Girls also pursue nontraditional disciplines in single sex schools (Mullins). Girls commonly

Imagine that you were in a classroom full of your gender how would you feel? Well, if you feel that you're not ok with that well, In school year 2004-05 122 public schools offered single sex classes and 34 public schools were single sex classes mandatory according to “Old Tactic Gets New Use: Public Schools Separate Boys and Girls.” Article. Close to 70% of kids in single sex classes raised their math and reading scores in “Old Tactic Gets New Use: Public Schools Separate Boys and Girls.” Article. Although this may seem bad and shouldn't happen it's really not. Kids in single sex classes will have more of a chance to succeed than students in non single sex class because of most kids have no problem with this in their school, less discipline, and most of all higher grades.

The programs that seperate the sexses in schools are usually based on very questionable science about the differences of girls’ and boys’ brains during development and learning, along with gender stereotypes. The American Civil Liberties Union’s article, ‘Sex-Segregated schools; Separate and Unequal’ says,” Advocates tell teachers that: Boys need a competitive and confrontational learning environment,

The effects can be minor, for example, studies have indicated girls perform better when the classroom temperature is warm, while boys perform better in cooler temperatures. More considerable effects include higher test scores. In the journal, Single- sex Education: What Does Research Tell Us?, published in The Economic and Social Research Institute, on July of 2010, author Emer Smyth reports girls were more likely to obtain higher grades in

In more recent years, our educational system has faced challenges that are leading our country back into segregation. Single-sex education has resurfaced; jeopardizing the gains our ancestors fought so hard for. A few people believe that the biological make-up between genders is significantly different, that having coeducational classes is doing more harm than good. Conversely, there is no proven study that supports these claims; however studies have displayed the exact opposite. Separating genders within the educational system will only perpetuate and magnify

After observing a school in Florida, the faculty learned that separating the boys and girls improved test scores immensely, and the scores are continuing to improve. Over 80% of students are now passing the tests now that they are learning in classrooms with their own gender. The improvement in test scores and the learning environments will benefit the students and help them succeed more in taking their tests.

There are many times in which people think that having single-sex classrooms would bring the success of students higher. By having single-sex classes boys won’t be “pressured” by the higher achievements of girls, boys tend to not read because around girls they are seen different in the view of other classmates. In the article “A Right to Choose Single-Sex Education” by Kay Bailey Hutchison and Barbara Mikulski, they mention “boys are most likely, for

Students will have to strive to be better in the classroom. Principal Jill Rojas states that “girls are more apt to answer questions aloud” in the classrooms when the teacher ask them. She also states that “Girls are learning to be more academically competitive and the boys are learning to collaborate.” Mrs. Rojas says that she likes to turn classes sessions like math into games because her boys “like competition.” So with the girls learning to be more competitive they are going to feel that they have to put forth more effort to be better that the other girls. If you have boys that are competing against each other in the classroom, they are always going to strive to be better that the other which will help the teachers teach them more. Yes, students need to learn to cooperate with the other gender, but single-sex classes allow students to thrive to be better in

Firstly, single gender classrooms are easier for students to learn in. As stated in the text, boys and girls tend to differentiate when it comes to abilities and learning subjects. It is arguable if opposite genders should learn the same subjects in school due to how differently they learn. Single gender classrooms are also less of a distraction. During a debate in the 1800s opponents of coeducational schools cited, “The need to protect girls both from danger to their health and from boys.” Boys are more likely to “show out” if girls are around to impress, taking away from school time and learning.

Lastly, students who go to single-gender schools do not have any academic advantages over children who attend co-ed schools. In “Co-Ed Schools are Here to Stay” the text states,”After looking at 184 studies, the researchers failed to find significant advantages of single-gender schooling for either boys or girls.” This shows that students at co-ed schools do just as well academically as students at single-gender schools. Knowing this information, there is no reason to send your child to a single-gender school when there is no advantages in you child’s school life or life as an adult.

In 2006 federal legislation allowed public school districts to create single- gender schools and classrooms for their students. That was a wise decision considering single sex schools have been proven to benefit students. Although society insist that coed school is a superior learning style and is key to getting better grades they are wrong, single sex schools actually have a better history with the educational performance of their students and due to that their students are acknowledged to obtain a more profound career path.

Boys and girls learn in two different ways. This reason is why having a single sex school is more rewarding than a co-ed school. According to Dr. Schlosser of Breckinridge County Middle School's (Kentucky) the difference between the way boys and girls learn are the type of weather boys and girls prefer.) Boys prefer to learn in a cool, dark room. When there are two different people wanting two different things its hard to please both sides. Boys also learn much slower than what girls learn, this could be a problem for girls in the same class as boys for girls would learn and to move on, but would have to cut back their learning to wait for the boys to learn the same material. Boys also are interested in different subjects than what girls like. Boys are most secretly interested in music, science, and math. According to GreatSchools.com says boys feel girls won’t like them when they know they are interested in other things such as music and math and not baseball, football, and soccer. Many boys won’t show interest in music in a co-ed school. When boys are placed in a single sex school they won’t have the feeling of impressing girls so more boys will show their interest in arts and music. Boys are much better with math and science than what girls are says NASSPE VIII. NASSPE Vlll is single-sex school out of Huston Texas. "The most profound difference between girls and boys is in any brain structure per se, but also in the sequence of

Another example of students being more focused in single-sex classrooms is when Hoffman, in his article "The Effect of Single-Sex Instruction in a Large, Urban, At-Risk High School", mentions:

In single sex schools boys and girls excel in subjects they usually would not. Single sex schools help children do well in subjects they usually would not be good at or subjects they would not usually try. For example girls do better at maths and science in all-girl schools; boys do better in languages and the arts in all boy schools. My first example to backup my point is a study by Cambridge University in 2006 where their research showed “boys improved in english and foreign languages in single sex classes, and girls improved in maths and physics. This proves girls and boys do better in subjects they usually would not do because they are more comfortable in a single sex school rather than a co-educational school. A second piece of evidence to help argue my point is a United States study that found boys at single sex

One reason why students do better in single-gender schools is because they are able to concentrate more. According to an article published by UCLA, it states that boys are less competitive and more cooperative in single gender environments. Students also,