The electoral college should be kept. Five times has a candidate won the electoral vote without the popular. The most recent being our last election. Each time, it sparks a debate on whether or not to do away with this system of voting. In fact, there have been 700 proposals in the last 200 years to get rid of, or modify the electoral college.
Issues vary significantly by location. The electoral college forces candidates to address problems in all demographics, rather than just focusing on urban areas where most of the population is located. Campaigns without the electoral college would focus on high population states, leaving a state such as Iowa, with a little over 3 million in population, with little say in the election over a state
The continuation of the Electoral College is constantly debated. Some want to discontinue the system while others want keep it. There are several arguments used by those who want to continue the system. One argument by Electoral College Advocates is the Electoral College balances the power of the large and small states in elections. These advocates state that doing away with the Electoral College would give the states with larger populations too much power in the outcome of elections. The advocates feel that presidential candidates will spend their resources on the states with the largest amount of voters. These advocates also believe that the Electoral College protects minorities’ interests. Some believe that without the Electoral College candidates would spend their time and resources on the majority of nation because that is where most of the votes will come from. Some advocates also argue that the Electoral College helps maintain the federal character of the United States. They argue that the system gives both the people and the states an important role in the electing of a president.
A Congressional Proportional method is another alternative being proposed in opposition to the Electoral College. A Congressional proportional method would allocate votes based on the winner of each congressional district. It would also award the winner of the overall popular vote in each state two electoral votes(senators). Once again on the surface this system looks fair and reasonable, but if you investigate deeply it can be seen that there is one glaring flaw in this system. The act of Gerrymandering which is used throughout the United States in every state is when the authority in each state decided which way the districts will be drawn. In simpler terms an authority could draw district that would exclude certain type of voters to increase
Those who are for the Electoral College have their own interesting host of points to make on the subject. They make mention of it contributing to the cohesiveness of the country, that it enhances the status of minorities, that it encourages political stability, and that it maintains a federal system of government and representation (Leip) . Regarding the Electoral College affecting the cohesiveness of the country, the concern is that without the Electoral College states with lower populations are devalued and that having the college ensures that they have some value and stake in its votes towards the election. This makes some sense, but it is just worth noting that the votes of the college are determined in some degree by population anyway.
One of the arguments in this article is that the Electoral College is outdated and should be removed. Then, it states that the Electoral College symbolizes "America's original sin," slavery. When slavery was common in the U.S, a direct popular vote would have the south at a disadvantage because at the time the Constitution gave no voting rights to the black population. Therefore, the North would have an advantage because of their large white population which did have the right to vote. The three-fifths compromise counted the slave population for voting purposes only, each slave being three-fifths of a white person, which gave the south more electoral votes. Another argument is that the Electoral College gives smaller states an advantage. Apparently,
How would we as Americans elect our president if we didn’t use the electoral college system? Would it be better or worse for our country? Our fore fathers wrote the constitution so that America would have a different result than the opposing countries. They wanted to ensure that the future generations could be successful and not deal with the tyranny that they had to deal with. Although I cannot discuss the constitution, but rather a small portion. The part of the constitution that peaks my interest the most is the Electoral College.
Research suggests that the Electoral College system should be amended because it poorly illustrates democracy, is outdated and
The Electoral College is something that affects every citizen in this country. The Presidential election is also something that many people feel passionate about, regardless of where you are. In the Presidential Election, Minnesota has voted for the democratic candidate almost every time in the last 100 years. However, Waconia has not been the best representation of the state's views, since it is one of the most conservative cities in the nation, making it a very unique place to live, politically. Because I have lived in Waconia and Minnesota my whole life, I have seen both sides of the Electoral College and how it affects my surroundings. The Electoral College is valuable for this state in the sense that it gives Minnesota some importance come election, even if we do vote democratic nine times out of ten. For the city of Waconia, the Electoral College might make citizens here think it is not the best system since most republican voters might feel like their votes mean nothing in the end, because of the consistent trend of this state voting for the democratic candidate.
The Constitution Convention of 1787 gave birth to the system of Electoral College. According to the Constitution, electors per state are equal to the number of seats each state holds in the Congress, which include the Senate and the House of Representative delegations. California holds the most Electoral which is 54 electors. However, with every census the numbers of each states electoral change due to the process called reapportionment. Reapportionment can be defined as the “the process by which congressional districts are redrawn and seats are redistributed among states in the house ; reapportionment occurs every ten years.” The Electoral College should not be preserved because it is unfair due to the fact that candidates who do not win plurality of the votes can still get electoral votes. It is unfair to depend on the 538 Electors to become the voice of three hundred and nineteen million people.
If the electoral college was abolished, then America would have a more pure vote. The electoral college delegates how much say a state has in government and limits some states while promoting the powers of others. The electoral college also has many deformities, including the winner take all system, a less pure vote, and a more concentrated support for a candidate from certain states that make it perfectly reasonable to abolish it.
The majority of Americans believe the Electoral College should be gotten rid of altogether. Liz Carbone, a political science major has done research on business and government, and also on the Electoral College says, the main controversy
One of the reason why the Electoral College should not be destroyed, is that it helps the candidates who may struggle with the popular vote. In 1980, for Presidential Election, candidate Ronald Reagan barely won the popular vote (50.7%). With the help of the Electoral Vote, Reagan took 91% of it, which then made him the winner (Doc B). Also in 1992, Candidate Bill Clinton, did not even have half the country on his side (43%). With the help of the Electoral Vote, Clinton
The value of the electoral college has been up for debate during the past few elections. When a candidate wins the popular vote but loses the electoral vote, it sparks a thought that the college might not be the most ideal setup for modern times. The argument against continuing the electoral college is that a democracy is based on the will of the people and whoever the people choose is who should win. This, however, was not the case recently. In the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by over a million votes, but lost the electoral college. The founding fathers put the system in place before there were 50 states and over 300 million people in America. The electoral college is outdated and a misrepresentation of the public's opinions and thus should be amended in the Constitution.
The Electoral college is very important part of the presidential election and we need to keep it because it is a fair and logical way in the choosing of our president. First, the electoral college votes professionally because they have experienced delegates and senators and that leads to a more professional and political vote in the election. Second, the electors in the electoral college will vote based on the political appeal of the presidential candidate rather than voting based on the popularity of the candidate. Third, The electors of the electoral college will vote for the presidential candidate based on his or her political qualifications rather than popularity. There is also one negative effect on choosing the presidential candidate
I believe that we don't need the Electoral College for multiple reasons. One of the reasons have to do with technology and another reason has to do with power. There are more reasons as well. While I believe that we don't need the Electoral College, if we go with the popular vote then we could run into issues like the candidates won't actually get more than half of America's vote.
I totally agreed with you , as stated in the article "It’s important to find ways of spinning negatives into positives". There are many negative people out there who thrive on their ability to bring others down to their level , which I believe is an expression of their inner doubt , and sadness. Moreover, we just have to learn to not being pulled down into their lower vibrations. I couldn't register for the event on Eventbrite I received the “registration closed” reply , I've sent out an email to David to find out if I could pay at the door , yet never heard back from