The Controversy of Stem Cell Research Essays

Embryonic stem cell research is a highly debated and sensitive topic.  There is a lot of good that can come from researching this technology of stem cell research because many people all across the globe would benefit from it.  The United States will soon fall short while other countries are already using this advancement if we cannot come to a logical conclusion on this vital issue.

Stem cell research has been quite a controversial topic since its origin in the 1960s by Gopal Das and Joseph Altman. Of course, anything that uses a human embryo would be. Stem cell research could open a vast number of new doors for modern science, it could let us test new drugs, one of which could be the unfound cure for AIDS or Alzheimer’s disease. However, this branch of science comes at a high price, the price of a human life that is only five to six days

Stem cell research has been a hot topic for debates all over the country. People from every major religion and walks of life are always trying to find the morality behind stem cells. However, not all religions have the same opinions.

Abortion, gay marriage, and illegal immigration are all hot button topics currently being faced by Americans. As ardently as each side defends their stance on a controversial issue, an opposing side fights with equal diligence for the beliefs they feel should be valued by our nation. Perhaps nowhere is this battle more heated than in the fight over stem cell research. While supporters of this new field of science tout it’s potential to cure everything from blindness to paralysis, those against stem cell science liken the procedures used by scientists to murder. It is my intention to bring to light the positive benefits of stem cell research as well as counter the claims used by many Pro-life groups who believe the scientists driving this

     The topic of stem cell research does not affect me so much at the moment. It might in the future, but for now it does not. I do believe that stem cell research should be used for cloning organs that will be used for organ transplants. I do not however think that parents should place the doctors on pedestals just because these “mad scientists” supposedly have the power of God.

While some people might say that stem cell research is immoral and unethical, others believe that it is a magical solution for almost any problem, thus leading to a very controversial issue. Scientists have been searching for years for ways to eradicate incurable diseases and perform other medical procedures that yesterday's technology would not fix. With the rapidly arising, positive research on stem cell technology, the potential that exists to restore any deficiency is in the same way, likely to destroy humanity. America is suffering from its inability to choose who holds precedence over this issue. Too many of us find it impossible to reach a basis for which our differing opinions can be shared and formed into a universal and

Stem Cell Research is still the most controversial topic in science today. The idea behind the experiment involves the development, use, and destruction of human embryos. The research method mainly focuses on embryonic stem cells, which involves taking tissue from an aborted embryo to get a better look at the cell and obtain information for the fundamental properties of the cells. Embryonic stem cells play a major role in the research because the cell provides information for cell development to create new drugs for medical disorders. Although stem cell research seems like that this perception could help cure precarious diseases like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson 's, and even diabetes, which would help the United States heavily, many consider the procedure unethical and dangerous. Stem cell research could help bring further advancement to the medical field, it can also transfer destruction.

Due to this topic being so controversial, many people such as Senators, the media, and cartoonists have been voicing their opinions publicly. One such public opinion is a political cartoon created by Gary Varvel. A scientist is shown throwing embryos into an active volcano labeled "Stem Cell Research." Behind him are three barbarians carrying a platform filled with cans of human embryos exactly like the one the scientist is emptying into the volcano. The scientist is asking the barbarians, "What makes you think this is human sacrifice?" From the cartoon, one can determine that Gary Varvel is against stem cell research.

Since stem cells can be used in so many areas of medical treatment, it is ashamed that there is such a controversy over this. Stem cell research could be life changing or life saving because of all the new things that can be done with stem cells. According to CBS News; body parts can now be manufactured

People may be influenced by the media to portray their views on Stem Cell research due to their religious beliefs. When in reality, more people are in favor of stem cell research than the media reveals.

Recently, there has been quite a lot of controversy among the media regarding the topic of stem cell research, its pros and cons, but what is this controversy really about? The term “stem” cells can be compared with another much known term: “differentiated” cells. The importance they bring to the humankind is that of the hope of new medical advancements being deposited into these cells because of their amazing capability to develop in almost any type of cell. For example, spinal cord cells that have been injured or neural cells in our brains that may have a certain type of disability would now be treated with these stem cells. Or, when talking about cancer, a disease that is nowadays affecting lots of people, especially

There are many arguments when talking about stem cells research. Some are for it and some are against it. The pros are that stem cell research can potentially treat or prevent various types of medical conditions and diseases. It could lead us to better treatment and possibly cure certain

During the presidency of George Bush, a ban was placed on stem cell research, due to pressure from pro-life groups. Bush states that the decision was not an easy one because he, just like many other Americans, was not well-versed on the subject matter during its early stages that began in 2001 (LifeNews, 2010). However, following Bush’s term as president, President Barack Obama lifted the ban, allowing for scientists to use stem cells for research. In this scientific controversy, the key actors are pro-life groups, scientists and policy makers who are under pressure to meet the demands of the people. Each group plays a significant role in this topic and each affects the decisions of stem cell research in a different way.

The controversial topic of stem cell research has been a controversial topic for a very long time. In 2001, George Bush severely restricted government-funded stem cell research. In 2009, Barack Obama allowed it. The order says that National Institutes of health can produce new procedures and policies in which the money can be used. On August 23, 2010, a federal judge issued an order blocking all research of stem-cells, including that allowed even when Bush was president. On July 27, 2011, Royce Lamberth, Chief judge of the federal court in Washington, D.C., said that stem cells could be used for life-threatening diseases. The Court of Appeals agreed with this, and the case was brought to a close (Stem cell policy).

It has been taken to account that the controversial topic of therapeutic and reproductive cloning research of all animals and humans is being debated on whether to vote for or against stem cell research. Based on what was researched on you; you yourself is having a hard time with this topic. If you don’t mind, I would like to give you my perspective on the topic. Hopefully you will consider what I am about to say ,when it comes to finding your conclusion on stem cell research.