The Conventional Nuclear Family in Britain Today Essay

Stephanie Coontz in “The Way We Weren’t: The Myth and Reality of the Traditional Family” emphasizes that the traditional and ideal nuclear family widespread in media and textbooks are false and far from reality. In fact, it is common to see more similarities to the traditional family consistent of “male breadwinner and nurturing mother” (1) today than in the past.

In 1970, 40% of couples were married with children. 2013 marked a new low as only 19% of household were married with children. A nuclear family is usually described as a heterosexual marriage with the average of 2.5 children, became synonymous with the American dream philosophy in the mid-1940s. The nuclear family standard is rapidly on the decline in the United States. These declining number have a range of causes. The causes of the decline of the nuclear family are cohabitation, childfree couples, high divorces rates, and the introduction of LGBTQ families. The effects are increased self-fulfillment, serial monogamy, childhood psychological trauma and family diversity. Gay and lesbian marriages

As soon as more domestic and family work is allocated to men then women will be able to attain equal pay. Women, with less work at home, will be able to commit to full time jobs, have to leave the workforce less, take less leave, and be able to climb the corporate ladder just as men are today.

this change, like our culture has not adapted to women being paid the same as men.

children to raise. He was not getting enough attention as he wanted at home, he got his

Despite the ever increasing number of women in paid work, paid work is still considered a secondary kind of work for women after

The Nuclear Family generally consists of a Mother, a Father and at least 1 child, this image of a family is thought to of come about at the time of the Industrial Revolution. (Willmott and Young) believe that an increase in the Nuclear Family was the result of the Industrialization. They found that during pre-industrial times, the most common type of family structure, was that of the Extended Family (Extended Family can take

Assess the extent to which social policies reflect and support the traditional nuclear family (24 marks)

Is it worth going back to the 1950s and experience the workplace of woman and men going to War or staying in the present time. Many people in today’s society see the morals and values of the past of the fifties. Nevertheless, the fifties had its nuclear family to where everyone was set for in life already. The woman became homemakers and men worked at an occupation. In the 1950s men were going to War, so the mother had to do both work and raise the family. However, after the War the woman wanting to continue to work, but the men were overpowering the woman in the past. In today’s culture everyone works and raise a family together. From the past to the present time of the 1950s the culture has changed. The woman finally got rights to do more activities now then it was in the fifties. Therefore, people have opinions to go back to the past to experience of what had happened to the nuclear family. America has changed by the culture and the environment from the 1950s to the present time of men and woman raising a family.

The idea of family diversity suggests that there is no dominate type of family, therefore none can be considered as the norm. However there are studies to suggest that in historical periods of Britain like when it was industrializing there is dominating types, in this period it was considered to be the nuclear family.

When it came to the Chipewyan, first marriages were arranged by parents, and girls were often betrothed in childhood. Patrilateral cross-cousin marriage may have been preferred. Polygyny was permitted and occurred most often among group leaders and skilled hunters. In aboriginal and early-contact times marriage was unaccompanied by ceremony, but today is attended by a Roman Catholic service. In the past the newly married couple resided with the bride's family until the birth of their first child, at which time they might take up residence with the husband's family. And when it came to divorce, it was available to both husband and wife, but was rarely done. Divorce is also not common in today’s time. Positions of leadership and authority were not there among the early times of the Chipewyan, but individuals with unique abilities were given respect and had a great influence. These men were usually hunting group and band leaders.

The Decline of Traditional Family Being Detrimental to Society Some people believe that the decline of the traditional family (Nuclear family) is detrimental to society because a lot of people are not socialising. This is one of the basic roles that a traditional family performs for individuals to meet the expectations of society. Only through a family can a person play a full part in society.

In a sociological perspective, family is interpreted as a social group whose members are bound by legal, biological, or emotional ties or a combination of all three. The sociological theories the connect to this concept are functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionalism. First, functionalism states that the family socializes children, it provides emotional and practical support for its members, and it provides its members with a social identity. Secondly, conflict theory states that members create disagreements, and create emotional support and comfort. Finally, symbolic interactionism claims family members and intimate couples interact on a daily basis. "Families are defined as a relationship by blood, marriage, or affection" (Seccombe 5).

This week in sociology, we discussed many important topics. These topics were mainly focused around family and marriage. We discussed the different forms of marriage and family. We specifically discussed how the social exchange theory views family. Furthermore, we discussed the conflict and functional approach to studying family. Like I stated, we discussed marriage as well, and shortly, I will describe my idea of a perfect marriage, what it looks like, and what makes it work.

Preuss (1999) proposed that human visual systems have utilized from experimental studies of the non-human primates for analysing The history of British family has changed enormous since 1945. In modern England, the nature of the family has differed in which compare with traditional family no matter is the character of family, the woman position in household. Meanwhile, the family value would change as people might not hold the marriage in the whole life. Divorce has become more common in the society. Nowadays, Britain has been appearing a variety type of family, for example the cohabitation of family together with the dink family which is described a family have no child but both of them have income (Invest Opeddia, 2014) .Similarly, the size of family also tends to smaller and smaller. The purpose of this essay is to analyses the family changing of Britain, for that reason the following part will utilize social sciences disciplines to explain and analyses in this complicated circumstance.