The Core Framework Of Paternalistic Leadership Style

Factors that can influence an individual’s choice of leadership in any given situation are many and varied. An individual is likely to have a primary leadership style which they are most comfortable with using. Often the primary leadership style is that which most suits their innate personality traits. For example,

Leadership can be defined as the process of identifying a goal, motivating others, and make them to achieve the mutually goals (Giltinane, 2013). According to Humphreys (2002), successful leaders do this by applying their leadership knowledge and skills. A good leadership is not only good at management, but also use different leadership styles in different situations. A successful corporation must has a good leader who have the flexible ability which can provide a suitable leadership to make the company successful. Furthermore, there have no perfect leadership styles in the world. Different leader have different leadership styles which also have the different strengths and weaknesses (Ali & Waqar, 2013). Leaders need to consider

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

First we must understand and define what leadership is in order to grasp the concepts that contribute to forming leadership styles and philosophies. Leadership is a combination of

Paternalism is the belief that someone knows 'better' than the individual him or herself what is the right way for that individual to live. For example, for centuries, many men had paternalistic attitudes about middle-class women, deeming it unseemly for women to work. Paternalism was used by self-interested whites to justify enslaving African-Americans for 'their own good,' or to colonize non-white people to 'carry the white man's burden.'

There are a number of factors that will influence the style of leadership a leader may choose, such as:

Have you ever had a leader that inspired you to develop your own leadership traits? “A leader is someone who demonstrates what’s possible” (Mark Yarnell, 2015). There are numerous leadership styles. Each of the numerous leadership styles can be beneficial if utilized in an appropriate means. I have chosen three leaders and their unique leadership styles to discuss in this paper. The unique styles that will be discussed are situational leadership, transformational leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. I will also discuss each leader’s approach, their fundamental leadership principles, and how each leader used their style within their profession.

To really comprehend the 'territory' of leadership, one should briefly scan some of the major theories, notice various styles of leadership and review some of the suggested traits and characteristics that leaders should have. There are many leadership theories. Arthur G. Jago (1982) proposed a framework that organizes leadership theories based on each theory's

Leadership influences a group of people towards an established, clear vision. Leadership styles differ considerably from leader to leader, while some leaders are more

Paternalism is prominent in modern day society and it continues to be very impactful in modern medicine. Paternalism can be portrayed in various forms and ways. In my social life for example, my parents have made decisions and chose to make medical decisions when I was younger. This is an example of soft paternalism because my parents took the opportunity to interfere with my autonomy when I was not mentally capable of making decisions.

Leadership is defined as one’s ability to influence others. However, when done well that influence enlists 4 major ingredients:

Since birth, there is an exposition of the human being to different types of Leadership. From mother emanates a sort of gentle Leadership, where she is constantly protecting her offspring, and preventing from danger. She is capable of precluding them from getting harm or maybe having singular experiences just to make them feel safe. The mother will support her offspring on each decision they make, even the dumbest ones. From father, there is a somewhat more aggressive Leadership style, where he also protects his offspring however; he encourages them to try different adventures, even if they are dangerous, to make his offspring as experienced as possible. This way when the father sets the example, his offspring will know that whatever moment of their journey they fail, he will support them because they have tried. The father 's primary goal is to make whatsoever he can in order to his offspring reach higher levels of proficiency, effectiveness, and success. The father wants his offspring to do better than he did. There are also Leadership styles that emanates from the grandparents. This kind of Leadership is between the Leadership style of the mother, and the father. It is protective like the mother 's nevertheless it is as well comforter when it concerns to the father 's aggressive Leadership style.

In traditional settings, leaders derive authority from bureaucratic values. In a bureaucratic authority, there is a hierarchy of relationships within the organization. Sergiovanni (2015), describes the relationship of supervisors and subordinates as lacking collaboration and common goals. In a hierarchy, “goals and

The leadership style also assumes that subordinates hand out the authority to the leader when they sign a contract with the organisation. In exchange of the financial and other benefits, the subordinate is provided with for the work, the subordinate hands power to the leader. This exchange leads to the important assumption that the subordinate’s role is to obey the instructions and objectives set out by the leader. Unlikely in leadership theories such as laissez faire, the subordinate doesn’t have the power to make decisions or step outside the provided norms, at least not without the leader’s permission.

To understand the framework and characteristics of laissez faire leadership is crucial to examine the concept of the leadership model. The knowledge of the history of the term and the concept can reveal why it became a popular idea within the leadership scene.