preview

The Corn Documentary Analysis

Good Essays

I thought corn farms had multiple farmers get up early around five o’clock in the morning. The farmers would pick the corn with tools and vehicles that was a result of industrialization. The farmers would drive trackers, plant seeds, and ship produce. Over time small family farms could not keep up if other farms used trackers. Now a single farmer could handle large farms, but smaller farms got torn down to make more room for farming. This leads to the result that eating cheaper food may not equal eating better. This video effectively explains the difference between a “cheap good” and “normal good.” Almost every product in conventional grocery stores from chickens to desserts is ultimately derived from the corn, either from corn-based animal feed or in the form of high fructose corn syrup. The film gives the viewer a good look at today’s agriculture and leaves the viewer’s questioning how much high fructose corn syrup is frequently used. King Corn makes it clear that mass produced corn has led to cheaper prices, but at what cost? Inferior corn cost less money, but it’s not as healthy as the normal corn. …show more content…

Agriculture now focuses on growing fast food. I learned about the farm program that the government supported family farms by limiting the number of grains shipped to the market. When the farms were expanded by the changed policy, corn became the king in America agriculture region. The agriculture focuses on results and what works to obtain that end result. However, it is the corporations benefits the most out of this system, not the farmers. Corporate consolidation of the food system from seeds, fertilizers, and food processors has become increasingly concentrated in the past few decades. Corporations that buy corn to turn it into fructose corn syrup have profited by the millions because of the cheap corn while the farmers have to rely on subsidies to

Get Access