them, and supported the claim of excess lands being given away. The Apex Court rejected both the claims of fraud and excess land being given and the Government was asked to pay costs of Rs. 5lakh to the company. The apex Court also asked the High Court to initiate criminal proceedings against the chief secretary and another officer of the state Government for not telling the whole truth in their sworn affidavits. Whatsoever the Court did not take into consideration the substantive issues behind the
Fargo"), and moves this Court for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Civil Rule 12(C). In light of this Court's January 22, 2009 Decision and Entry Granting Defendant Wells Fargo N.A.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss, the only remaining claim asserted against Wells Fargo by Plaintiff, Apex Restoration, LLC ("Apex"), is its second claim, alleging unjust enrichment. However, construing all material allegations in the Complaint as true, Wells Fargo is entitled to judgment against Apex as a matter of law
branches to balance out power. Colonists now chose who represents them in the House of Representatives. Under the rule of the Articles of Confederation the country had no government to enforce order and this nearly led to anarchy. There was no court to settle disputes over state borders claims in the west. States could print their own money which led to inflation in some states and only states could tax their citizens not congress. This made it very hard to repay the countries war debt. When the
provide guidance on the law. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issues rulings that address the application of the law to specific fact situations. The court system is also involved in making tax law through decisions about specific fact situations. The main tax courts are the US Tax Court and the District Courts of the US. These decisions can (and do) overturn and change tax provisions based on other decisions, as well as the legislative history of the particular legislation.
makes life worth living and it includes the health aspect, the societal values in the status particularly in the norms within the society; in all those things which make the life with dignity; hence it is not animal life but a political one. Supreme Court in many judgments held that the life is not bare life devoid of all things in society rather it includes the basic values which makes life worth living. In the words of Mahatma Gandhi: “According to me, the economic constitution of India, and for
the Constitution, Congress was given the power to levy taxes, regulate trade between the states, raise an army, control interstate commerce, and more. A three-branch government was established in which a judicial branch handled disputes in a federal court system, a President headed an executive branch, and a legislative branch. Conversely, the anti-federalists believed in weak central and strong state governments, as the way it was in The Articles of Confederation and believed in strict adherence to
Supreme Court turned the wheel of education the Supreme Court through its tendency towards broad and normative enunciations of positive rights. The best illustration of this trend can be traced in the famous Mohini Jain’s case and Unnikrishnan’s case wherein the Supreme Court ruled that Article 45 in Part IV has to be read in 'harmonious construction ' with Article 21 (Right to Life) in Part III of the Constitution, as Right to Life loses its significance without education. The apex Court made the
the situation. Stanton died on September 4, 2016 of a heart attack without having responded to either’s inquiries. On September 21, 2016, Pearson sent Carter a letter demanding that Carter vacate both the Farm and home immediately. DISCUSSION A court will likely find Carter to be the legal owner of the Farm, even though he recorded deed with the County after Pearson, because Pearson had constructive notice of Carter’s ownership interest in the land. Under Texas law, [a] conveyance of real property
22 August 2008 - In January 2008, the Supreme Court validated long-term live-in relationships as marriages. A Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat with P Satasivan declared that children born out of such a relationship will no longer be called illegitimate. "Law inclines in the interest of legitimacy and thumbs down 'whoreson ' or 'fruit of adultery '," the court added. The apex court judgment was followed by similar suggestions from the National Commission for Women (NCW).