The Court Of Supreme Court

1485 Words6 Pages
IV. THE COURT ERRED IN ENFORCING A MEDIATED AGREEMENT WHICH WAS OBTAINED HEAVILY INFLUENCED BY THE GAL WHOM COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE COURT CORRUPTING THE IMPARTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE COURT, THEREBY MAKING THE WHOLE PROCESS VOID AS A MATTER OF LAW. A. The actions of the court’s appointed Guardian ad Litem constitute fraud on the court because they corrupt the impartial functions of the court. In Parramore v. Parramore, 61 Fla. 701, 703 (1911), the Supreme Court of Florida affirmed the decree of the trial court annulling the final decree of divorce due to fraud upon the court. The defendant in Parramore tried to commit fraud upon the court to prevent his wife from fully and fairly presenting her case in court. The defendant in Parramore “sued the complainant as being a resident of the city of Waco, Texas, and swore in an affidavit attached to the bill of complaint that the said complainant resided at Waco, Texas.” Id at 796. The court in the tenth circuit defined fraud on the court and other courts have adopted this description as “fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury . . . It is thus fraud where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function -- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.” Bulloch v. United States, 721 F.2d 713, 718 (10th Cir. 1983);

More about The Court Of Supreme Court

Open Document