The Crime Control Model And Due Process Model

The criminal justice system consists of models and theories that often contradict one another. Of these models are the crime control model, the due process, model, the consensus model and the conflict model. In this paper these models are evaluated and defined, as well as each entity in the criminal justice systems role within each model. Policing, corrections and the court system all subscribe to each model in some way and in a hurried manner in cases that dictate such a response. As described by Erik Luna in the Models of Criminal Procedure, the following statement summarizes the aforementioned most appropriately.

Both models’ fundamental principal is discovering the truth. The crime control model focuses on the truth regardless of how it is reached whereas the due process model places restrictions on what the state can do to discover the truth. In addition, the crime control model aims for the repression of criminal conduct, whilst the due process model aims to prevent and eliminate crime. Packer’s intentions were not to create two separate models; rather he intended to create a spectrum from one extreme to the other. The Scottish legal system does not wholly consist of crime control elements nor due process elements. It is a mixture of both of these models that attempts to balance the rights of the state to secure a conviction, with the rights of the accused to a fair trial. It can be seen that there is not an appropriate balance between the two as there is not equal and proportionate rights given to both parties, resulting in excessive protection being given to the defendant. This imbalance is best described by discussing the powers of the state in contrast to the defendant’s rights pre-trial and during trial.

The major difference between the crime control model and the due process model of law enforcement is that crime control works to repress criminal activity, and due process works to protect a person's rights. Crime control is more focused on the community well-being, versus due process which focus's more on the person who committed the crime. Crime control also believes that it is better to detain an innocent suspect rather than let them be free until proven guilty. Obtaining evidence becomes the number one priority for crime control. Due process only allows evidence to be collected a certain way. Criminals may be allowed to go free if a there was an error in collecting evidence. For an example, in the O.J Simpson case there were issues involving

The Due Process and Crime Control Models are able to coexist. Frank Scmalleger, a noted criminologist, support a new approach where "it is realistic to think of the U.S. system of justice as representative of crime control through due process." (Schmallager et al, 1999) In using both of these models law enforcement and the judicial system can

The only similarity between Due Process and Crime Control Model is that they both relate to the framework of the United States Constitution. They both embrace Constitutional work and values relating to our adversarial system. Both models make it known that law enforcement including prosecutors and police are not allowed to act against a person unless there is some probable cause and evidence that illustrates that they violated the law.

The Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model are often used in combination with each other in most of the modern day criminal justice process. In the case of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was the primary suspect of the bombing occurred during the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013, the enforcement actions that the police took on him were however mainly based on the Crime Control Model. The process was first focused on the efficiency of capture the suspect based on factual guilt rather than the taking the longer Due Process with Legal Guilt.

The value basis that underpins the crime control model is founded on the suggestion that the despotism of criminal behavior is by a great extent the most essential function to be undertaken by the criminal process. The absolute let down by the law enforcement to curb and control criminal behavior is perceived as the principal raison d'être leading to a crash of public order and a broad ignorance of the legal control measures are likely to grow. Accordingly, the crime control model takes cognizance of the maximization of the number of wrong doers caught, stopped and dealt with by justice.

The Deterrence theory is a key element in the Criminal Justice System. It’s principles about justice appeal to us because it adapts to our ideas of what we identify as fairness. Punish the sinful and the ones who break the law, swiftly, to the extent that pain will dissuade them from committing a crime ever again. Its sole purpose, to instill fear. Fear of breaking the law because of its punishments. We not only use this theory to punish criminals, but it is a basis in which we raise our kids and pets on, that breaking the rules can lead to consequences. The deterrence theory says that people obey the law because they are scared of getting caught and being punished. It is said that people do not commit crimes because they are afraid of getting caught, instead they are being motivated by some other deep need. In my paper, I will address the two theorists who re-conceptualized the deterrence theory, the principles and two types of deterrence as well as give short insight into my own opinions on the deterrence theory.

In its most basic sense, the crime control model, when considering the issue of disparity and discrimination, typically addressed the issue regarding how crimes were enforced in a discriminating way and how the effects on the notion ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ The crime control model aims to protect the liberty of the individual citizens at absolutely all costs.

The theory that changed the way I look at things is the Crime Control Theory. Crime control model, with higher reliance on the investigatory and prosecutorial officers in the society, argues the importance of repression of crime. It thinks that a free and safe society should be based on the maximum reduction of crime perpetration. As such, crime control theory argues that criminal justice should concentrate on the protection of victim's rights rather than the defendant's rights and police powers should be reasonably extended so that the law enforcement could protect the law-abiding members of the citizens to its fullest extent, and the punishment should be swift and certain to discourage the future offenses and will-be offenders. In contrast to the due process model, crime control model assumes a suspect to be guilty until the fact-finding process suggests him or her to be innocent and the objective of discovering the truth rather than protecting the innocence or liberty of citizens are highly valued.

However, I disagree. I would choose the due process model. I believe that due process can work hand in hand with crime and control and must be a main focus of our attention. First of all, if due process is happening than crime control must be working. There would be no due process without crime control.

Throughout the years, the association between a criminal offense and a criminal have become more relevant. Although there are many theories that try to illustrate the concept of why crimes happen, no theory has a profound influence of understanding an individual’s nature, relationship, development, and a society itself (Coleman & Ganong, 2014). To further explain, “theories of crime are defined in relation to modernity, spanning their development from the enlightenment to the present, with the advent of postmodernism” (Miller, 2012, p. 1798). In other words, theories of crime are an approach to understanding an individuals behaviour and actions in their environment, society, and themselves that may lead to crime. Nevertheless, within this paper, it will be comparing the case of

Without trial is it possible to describe the court system as legitimate (again, consider Tyler)? Does Galanter’s description of the court process fit more into Packer’s Crime Control Model or Due Process Model of criminal processing?

Three broad models of criminal behaviors are the following: psychological, sociological and biological models. Actually, it is difficult to completely separate them and it is generally accepted, that all of them play a role in the interpretation of behavior. Though psychological principles can be applied across all the three models, they all have some specific ones, which would help in implementing across different crime control policies.

However, the due process model emphasizes on the role of individual liberties in reducing crime. It believes that when given freedom and liberties, people have the ability to eliminate crime in the society. Based on the rate of crime in the society, the crime control model is the most effective to reduce crime. One of the key differences between the two models is in their perception of crime repression. Crime control model asserts that the criminal justice system should aim at crime repression as its most important function in order to reduce crime in the society.