The Criminal Justice System Biased? Law Enforcement

Media bias affects just about anything in a society. It can portray certain people from different ethnic, culture, and religious backgrounds as second class citizens and deteriorates their images as a peaceful law abiding citizen. However, media bias also affects law enforcement. In the last few years, the media has painted police officers as a negative image. With the unfortunate events of Travon Martin, Mike Brown and others, the media has depicted law enforcement as a whole to be the bad guys. The story of Travon Martin is what brought attention to certain unnecessary forces that a few police officers had choose to use. On the night of February 26, 2012, Martin was shot by a police officer, George Zimmerman, whom was not charged for murder.

Within the criminal justice system, officials abuse their power. The officials of the justice system have a duty to protect and perform their duties with unbiased decision making. The abuse of power jeopardizes people’s lives who are not able to sustain oneself and their families. Some people do not understand that poorer people find themselves in jail more and once a person is released, that person is subjected to return to jail for the amount of money owed to the state. There are many obstacles for the poor, especially those of color. People of color are treated unfairly in the justice system, from the arrest, the sentencing, and the release. The criminal justice system is supposed to be just but that is not the case. The criminal justice system allows for the police, public defenders, and judges to bend the laws and not be punished for their actions or that apologizes can fix the wrong that has been done. This paper will discuss the abuse of power from the justice system and the solutions to rectify the damages.

To make a good juror, you would need someone who is not racist, sexist, or biased, because it would make our Criminal Justice System a lot more fair.

It appears that the criminal justice system is racially biased. Instead of the criminal justice system giving all of the citizens of the United States of America the same civil treatment, it treats all individuals differently based upon the color of an individual’s skin. What does it mean to be racially biased? Being racially biased is known as to judge one by his or her physical appearance. Treating people of color unfairly is still common to this day. The criminal justice system is racially biased in its law enforcement, prisons, and court systems.

Although saying the criminal justice system is racist is a controversial statement, there is evidence and statistics that prove it to be true. Research and evidence validate the issue of racism to be undeniable. Equality and justice are out of reach with the racism that takes place in our criminal justice system and our country. Racial discrimination is prevalent amongst the African American culture in issues regarding drug use, and incarceration which creates unfair inequality for this race. I will use peer reviewed articles to verify the racial disparity in the criminal justice system.

The 13th Amendment to the American Constitution is celebrated and known as the amendment to end slavery. The amendment provides that, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction” (U.S. Constitution, Amendment 13). What is often overlooked is that this amendment abolishes slavery, unless you are a criminal. After the Civil War, this loophole was wildly used by slave owners, as they would convict African Americans of minor crimes to then use them as slaves again. This exception to the amendment is continually used today in the American prison system. The Criminal Justice System in America contains significant flaws that are detrimental to society. A few of these flaws lie within the actions and ideals of the prison system, the policies and laws surrounding the criminal justice system, and the American Legislative Exchange Council.

I feel like the racial disparities produced in the criminal justice system has always been the same, unfair and discriminate towards a certain group of people. We(americans) are still stuck on the old ways of inequality of race. People with brown skin aren't equal to those that are white, at least in the criminal punishment part of it. And I think prejudice has a lot to do with it. I feel like when people look at blacks, mexicans, and other colored races, they assume they're just another criminal and don't deserve the same rights as whites. Law enforcement, especially recently, have just assumed the worst in a person of color and treat them like animals. They immediately arrest or kill just because it's easier to do than giving them a voice

the juvenile portion of the criminal justice system. The article found that, “black youth were

This paper will explore some of the disparities of how different types of groups are treated, by both federal and state law enforcement agencies, in the American judicial system. Additionally, how discrimination also factors in these processes, from arrest to conviction, while evolving through time in our society. How do these subjects and differing policies influence outcomes in the judicial process? Are there rational theories for some of these practices or instances? We will explore each specific term, consequences, compare and contrast their effects on the judicial process, while gaining some insights and providing specific examples. The purpose of this paper is to some examine online articles and published information, in an attempt to shed some light on this phenomena in our system.

Unfair police lineups have become a rising issue in the American criminal justice system in recent years. More specifically, unfair police lineups have made witnesses and victims more susceptible to confuse innocent and guilty suspects in a criminal trial. There is a series of research and experimental research that has been done on this topic in recent years that have proven this hypothesis to hold true in many cases. Some research suggests that often times, the witness or identifier on the stand in a trial, does not necessarily “confuse” the suspect in the lineup, rather he or she makes a faulty decision based on his own biased opinions. Whether the victim or the person identifying the accuser is bias about physical appearance, verbal resonance, or another personal reason, it has been proven to be extremely unfair for those people involved in police lineups who are truly innocent. The research that was examined in this study compared fair lineups with unfair lineups and as a result, the two data corresponded with one another when analyzed.

It is obvious that police officers are using their jobs as law enforcers to obtain illegal items and are shamefully betraying their police departments. The policemen who were involved in this drug smuggle were veterans. When people think of veterans, whether it be a veteran of war or a veteran of a police department, we think of someone who has devoted many years, served and been loyal to the service. People have admiration for veterans and recognize them for being committed to the service as well as being faithful to every year they have been involved in it. Now the four veteran police officers from Chicago will be spending time in prison instead of adding more years to the service of policing. Those years that the veteran police officers were dedicated to the policing is now history, they could have helped lower crime rates in Chicago, but instead they are facing prison time.

When you think of the criminal justice system, you think of justice being served to those who wish to threaten it. The criminal justice system is a very powerful system that protects our society but like society, it is not perfect. The justice system runs off of discrimination against race and gender

Imagine that you are a police officer, and you are working patrol downtown. While you are on patrol, you observe a car speeding and driving wreck-less. You pull the car over and discover it is the Chief of Police. The Chief apologizes and informs you that he had a little too much to drink at an event he attended tonight. He tells you that if you let him go he will see to it that you receive a promotion. What would you do? Would you follow the protocols and procedures? Or let him go? As a person of power you have the option to choose to uphold the law or look the other way. This ethical dilemma displays police corruption and discretion. This paper will examine different studies

One of the most interesting things I learned from doing my research on community corrections in my jurisdiction is how the criminal justice system is committed to being fair and balanced. I have observed in a court arraignment how a judge briefed everyone in the court about proper protocols during the hearings .The judge said he could not start court hearings unless a prosecutor was present, and that he cautions the inmate the right to remain silent, and also discussed to the inmate his rights. Community-based corrections developed as a result of dissatisfaction with institutional confinement and in recognition of the problems encountered by inmates reentering society after prolonged incarceration. Belinda R. McCarthy, Bernard J. McCarthy, Jr,& Matthew C. Leone (4th edu.). (2001) Community-Based Corrections. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group. In writing this paper I will inform and discuss the various programs and rules applied to handle offenders who have violated state laws according to the criminal justice system in NC. I will write about the following subjects in the following order: 1) Parole and probation, 2) Community and drug courts, 3) Pretrial release, 4) Victim aid, and 5) Community service (as a function of service of sentence).

Most politicians and ordinary Americans are easy to support the "law and order" and "fight crime" rhetoric. After all, crime is a voluntary act. No one sin, so what happens to them in the legal system, once they are released they are chosen and deserved. Of course, that sounds good, but that is not the case. The color of the people mercilessly pursue the same crimes than whites. The color of the person faces a worse judgment and an unfair jury. Once they leave, they face additional discrimination. They may also go back to jail because they do something to commit crimes in order to survive and care for their families. . As the nation of Alexandria, "the genius of the current caste system, and its predecessors the biggest difference is that it