The Criminal Justice System in Canada

There are three components for the criminal justice system is the police, the courts and then corrections. The police enforce the law by apprehending offenders, investigating crimes and also trying to prevent crimes among other things. The courts conduct fair and impartial trials; they determine criminal cases and decide if an offender is guilty or innocent along with many other things. Corrections carry out sentences that have been decided by the courts, they protect the public, and they rehabilitate; reform and reintegrate convicted offenders back into society (2011 CJi Interactive)..

Many Canadian citizens would argue that The Canadian Independent Justice System is a threat to democracy. An independant Justice system is when the courts do not depend or rely on the government. They operate on their own and are independent from any government organizations. The Canadian independent Justice System is beneficial and good for democracy because the Judges can not be intimidated by the threat of losing their job, the court system allows appeals, and judges must abide to The Canadian Charter of Rights. The Canadian Independent Justice System is not a threat to democracy.

The Criminal Justice System has many components that make it up. There are many differences and similarities between Canada and America like the culture, religion, and governments. Some of the main differences and similarities being the Criminal Justice System. The Criminal Justice System is the law that is related to arresting, sentencing and punishing people if found guilty with jail time, probation, or community service. In this research paper, I will be stating some of the main differences and similarities between the Canadian and American Judicial System.

The criminal justice system has been proven to play a very important role in society. The criminal justice system is used to keep the citizens in check and to make sure that the laws that are made are being followed. It also is there to penalize anyone who disobeys the laws. In the criminal justice system, there are 3 main parts, law enforcement, adjudication, and corrections. Law enforcement is self-explainable. It consists of the law enforcers such as police officers and sheriffs. Adjudication is made up of people in the court house such as judges and lawyers. Corrections is made up of jailhouse matters such as prison officials. In these many components of the criminal justice system, there are all put in place to help correct people to do the right thing. There are punitive efforts and rehabilitative efforts. At time, the system may lean towards one category or more, which can be dangerous in terms of disciplinary action. The criminal justice system is more punitive than rehabilitative which makes the system ineffective.

Youth and juvenile crime is a common and serious issue in current society, and people, especially parents and educators, are pretty worried about the trend of this problem. According to Bala and Roberts, around 17% of criminals were youths, compared to 8% of Canadian population ranging between 12 to 18 years of age between 2003 and 2004 (2006, p37). As a big federal country, Canada has taken a series of actions since 1908. So far, there are three justice acts in the history of Canadian juvenile justice system, the 1908 Juvenile Delinquents Act, the 1982 Young Offenders Act, and the 2003 Youth Criminal Justice Act. In Canada, the judicial system and the principle of these laws have been debated for a long time. This paper will discuss how

Canada's Justice System It’s a common belief that western nations believe that their own justice system is blind, and that all people are equal before the eyes of the law. Whether or not that’s true is an entirely different scenario. Canadians take pride in our open mind approach to and acceptance of all cultures, multiculturalism is what makes this Canada so unique and great.

The criminal justice system is composed of three parts – Police, Courts and Corrections – and all three work together to protect an individual’s rights and the rights of society to live without fear of being a victim of crime. According to merriam-webster.com, crime is defined as “an act that is forbidden or omission of a duty that is commanded by public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law.” When all the three parts work together, it makes the criminal justice system function like a well tuned machine.

The Canadian criminal justice system consists of multiple roles in order to sustain a well-working government system. The system is put in place in order to keep safety, equality, peace and fairness. There are four main functions of the criminal justice system that are interrelated segments that help protect a society from crime. The criminal justice system consists of policing, courts, corrections and parole. The component of the Canadian Criminal Justice System that will be discussed is about the process and function of the courts.

Between the two schools of epistemology, rationalism and empiricism, I am inclined towards the philosophies of rationalism. I am persuaded towards philosophical approaches which are superior at attaining truth. Empiricism relies on observation using the five senses in reasoning to achieve truth. However, in Plato’s Thaetetus, Socrates gives strong arguments for the limitations of human perception. The Canadian legal system, also, recognizes flaws in human observation, which increases my skepticism of empiricism. Conversely, rationalism relies solely on the use of logic and deduction in reasoning. Both, Plato and Socrates stressed the value of rationalism through the ability to know and express combinations of elements through mathematics. Large

Wrongful conviction is an issue that has plagued the Canadian Justice System since it came to be. It is an issue that is hard to sort out between horrific crimes and society’s desire to find truth and justice. Incidences of wrongful conviction hit close to home right here in Saskatchewan as well as across the entire nation. Experts claim “each miscarriage of justice, however, deals a blow to society’s confidence in the legal justice system” (Schmalleger, Volk, 2014, 131). Professionals in the criminal justice field such as police, forensic analyst, and prosecutors must all be held accountable for their implications in wrongful convictions. There are several reasons for wrongful convictions such as racial bias, false confessions, jailhouse

The Canadian Criminal Justice System is, for the most part, reflective of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and various Supreme Court of Canada case-law. Everyone who finds themselves on the opposing end of the Criminal Justice System is entitled to certain protections every step of the way, beginning even before the arrest; laws protect us from unreasonable investigative techniques, guarantee certain rights at point of arrest, and provide us with the right to counsel. The bail court departs from the ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ standard in that the crown only needs to prove on a balance of probabilities (Kellough, 1996, p. 175) in order to take away a person’s freedom. It is for this reason I decided to limit the scope of my

The system includes five sections which are law enforcement these are the police officers that patrol the streets and are the first to respond to an emergency call. The second one are the prosecutors. These lawyers are the one who represent the state and the government. They press charges on the offenders or the people who violate the law. The third one is the Defense attorney. These lawyers represent the offenders and their rights. The fourth one is the courts. In the court the judges decide the offender’s faith. The last part is corrections. In the correction section the offenders are put in prison and is the job if the correction officers to help and rehabilitate the

Green criminology was first mentioned by Lynch in 1990, and from then has developed as a branch of criminology that focuses on harms against the environment. The popularity of green criminology has risen over the past 20 years with recognition that concerns about environmental harms and crimes should have a more prominent place within the field of criminology (Mares, 2010). Despite a consensus among nations, identified by Nurse (2015), that the environment and natural resources should be protected, green criminology has its critics, with some criminologists not seeing green crimes and harms as a priority within criminology. This essay will look at the characteristics and approaches of a green criminology, focusing on how different aspects of green criminology may be an advantage or disadvantage and how they play a part in green criminology’s role in society.

Lynch first mentioned green criminology in 1990, and from then has developed as a branch of criminology that focuses on harms against the environment. The popularity of green criminology has risen over the past 20 years with the recognition that concerns about environmental harms and crimes should have a more prominent place within the field of criminology (Mares, 2010). Despite a consensus among nations, identified by Nurse (2015), that the environment and natural resources should be protected, green criminology has its critics, with some criminologists not seeing green crimes and harms as a priority within criminology. This essay will look at the characteristics and approaches of a green criminology, focusing on how different aspects of green criminology may be an advantage or disadvantage and how they play a part in green criminology’s role in society.

     Environmental regulations have been established without regard to economic ramifications, and a general litigation craze has assigned legal liability without regard logical personal or corporate responsibility. Basically, groups of individuals that had little or nothing to do with a site's contamination become responsible, and in turn, liable for its cleanup. Meanwhile, the actual polluters escape accountability. Some cleanup requirements are far too strict, yet others are ambiguous to a point, and changing. Furthermore, the division of authority between levels of government, or red tape, and various agencies make compliance with the laws difficult.