The Crisis Caused By The Collapse Of The American Investment Bank

The largest banking institution in the United States, Bank of America, has been characterized with numerous controversies in the recent past. While the institution only got bigger since the financial crisis and government intervention through bailouts, Bank of America headed towards collapse. In 2011, Bank of America experienced several protests of its branches by various groups like National People's Action, US Uncut and other progressive activists (Jaffe par, 1). These protests were fueled by the groups' anger at Bank of America's tax dodging, huge bonuses that were paid after government bailouts, foreclosures, and other harmful practices. These protests contributed to increased concerns on whether the too-big-to-fail behemoth would really collapse.

Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 originated in the United States spread to the financial systems of many other countries, including CIS countries, by means of the domino effect. Bankruptcy of one of the largest Americans Bank, Lehman Brothers Holdings PLC, in someway was a launcher of this global crisis the scope of that can be compared with the Great Depression of the 30s of the last century. No one could have even believed that a crisis in the local market of subprime mortgage loans in the USA would have such enormous affect on the financial systems over the world and crash banking sectors of many countries one by one.

Since 2003, there are economists warned America  's real estate bubble will burst a year, although this prediction has not fulfilled,however, the occurrence of happen sooner or later. In 2007 August,America sub-prime mortgage crisis broke out suddenly, not only the real estate bubble has finally burst, America also fell into the since twentieth Century 30 the Great Depression of the most serious financial crisis.

American debt held by households is rising ominously, plus our economic policies change. That debt balloon powered by radical income inequality will become the next bust. It drives by spending on domestic demand or more likely consumer spending not just by the wealthy, but by everyone else. An important explaining about the unity that emerged from our latest research has shown as relatively that ten percent were prosperous, saving, and investment in which natural and interests to find the path of them in the financial markets, but primarily ninety percent had borrowed. As the result many Americans concern about the financial crisis and the cartoon uses to sarcasm, irony, and logos to convey its message.

As the world’s largest economy, every move the United States makes has widespread effects throughout the global markets. Around the world, there has been speculation of whether the U.S. will raise interest rates by the end of 2015. With all indications pointing to a rate increase, concerns have arisen about the potential ripple effects on the rest of the world. Fundamentally, raising interest rates come hand in hand with an appreciating U.S. dollar. In many parts of the world the U.S. Dollar is used as a major benchmark of current and future economic growth. For developed countries, a strong U.S. dollar can be viewed as positive, however emerging economies will face a different fate. As the world becomes more financially intertwined,

In 2008, the world experienced a horrific financial crisis which has been considered one of the worst recessions since the Great Depression of the 1930s. After posing an enormous negative effect on the U.S. economy, the financial crisis started to spread across Europe and the rest of the world. The financial crisis ruined economies, crumbled financial corporations and deprived lives. Over the past several years, financial innovation has presented U.S. households with an overflowing set of financial options to choose from. On a daily basis, millions of financial transactions take place throughout our banking and finance systems. These financial transactions may consist of writing checks, depositing cash, wiring

The 2008 financial crisis brought panic and fear to the nation as the stock market plunged, reducing the wealth of millions of Americans. The housing market crash put nearly all the major financial institutions in grave danger of insolvency. The government reacted quickly to not only stop the bleeding and devastation but also to restore confidence in the financial system and reassure the public the economy wasn’t in a free fall. This was not a time to sit back and let the market self-adjust.

Rich's editorial on the 2009 Wall Street economic crisis, which focuses on the deleterious ramifications of the economic collapse on the American citizens, and the contrary prosperity of banks and the central government, presents at its forefront the propositions that the banks of the nation had, at that time, been profiting at the expense of the people, and that the financial statuses of the banks and the citizens are in fact cyclical, implying that a reversal of financial prosperity had been in order. In light of recent and present economic circumstances, Rich's claims demonstrably and logically hold up. Namely, the effects of the 2009 economic crisis are ever-present and undeniable, the citizens had been suffering and wallowing in debt while

The Global Recession of 2007-2009 also considered as the “Great Recession”, which officially lasted from December 2007 to June 2009, was the worst recession that have happened since the Second World War. European countries as Greece, Germany, and Spain were the most affected. All of them believed in the implantation of “Austerity measures”, set of policies with the ambition of reducing government budget deficit by cutting expenditures, increasing taxes or a mixture of both. Governments reacted to the eurozone debt crisis and Great Recession in different ways. One pattern is that expenditures of government rose and taxes fell from 2007-2009, and that the reverse took place from 2010-2012.

The Global Financial Crisis revealed many flaws in the institutional framework of the Eurozone, as well as the flaws in the policies implemented in the aftermath of the revelation of the crisis. One of the major flaws revealed in the institutional arrangement of the Eurozone project, is the clause in the Maastricht Treaty which limits the ceiling on the ratio of the annual government deficit to gross domestic product. As a result of the Global Financial Crisis, The Maastricht Treaty put into place structural impediments that prevented member states from implementing counter-cyclical policies. It is likely that the crisis left a deep and long-lasting effect on economic performance and overall social hardship. Job losses were contained for some

By the end of 2008, the European Union began experiencing rippling effects of the United States financial crisis. Several member countries, most notably on the southern end of the continent, faced high levels of debt and unemployment. Portugal, Iceland, Ireland, Greece, and Spain, derogatively referred to as “PIIGS,” required extensive economic support from the EU in order to repay government debts and bail-out private banks. Disbursal of aid in 2010 proved successful in promoting economic recovery in some countries; however, the vast majority observed only slight economic improvement which led to doubts regarding the effectiveness of the harsh austerity measures implemented. Ireland has most clearly benefited from the financial support of the European Union as the country’s unemployment rate has dropped below ten percent and is expected to witness 4.5% GDP growth in 2016. Portugal, on the other hand, shows little fiscal improvement as evident in an unemployment rate of 13% and an expected GDP growth of only 1.6% in 2016. Although both countries faced tough financial crises in 2010, Ireland has notably outperformed Portugal in resolving the situation. The weak economy in Portugal, as well as continued fiscal hardship in the remaining “PIGS” countries, threaten the preservation of the European Union as financial inequality between the members persists.

The global financial crisis of 2008-09 that spread contagiously across the globe has particularly hit the European economies hard, accentuating turmoil in the world financial markets and precipitating the European sovereign debt crisis almost instantaneously. This has consequently wiped away all of the EU’s accomplishments in economic growth and job creation (European Commission, 2010a:3). Statistics published subsequently exposed the magnitude of the crisis: real GDP contracted by 4%, unemployment soared at an unprecedented level, public finances deteriorated, and social cohesion in the EU has fragmented (Eurostat, 2010). The crisis has also exposed the fundamental weakness of the Union, especially in the face of new challenges from emerging market competition, an ageing population, and depletion of resources. Therefore, the Europe 2020 strategy adopted by the European Commission in 2010 introduces a new growth model for the EU to respond to the various challenges mentioned above, particularly the global financial crisis. (European Commission, 2010a:5).

As many countries are part of the European Union and heavily rely on the EU to financially keep their nations afloat, the shared economy must do what it can to aid those European nations with weak economies. Mentioned in Chapter 16 of lecture, a number of European economies struggled financing government debt, boosting interest rates on government bonds. Such countries included Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain (also known as PIIGS).

There are several distinctive moments for which a strong argument can be made as the start of the 2008 financial crisis. Some experts argue that the pivotal moment was the failure of Lehman Brothers, which resulted in a run on financial institutions, while others blame the crisis on the housing bubble that burst in 2007, following years of skyrocketing prices in that market. Digging deeper than the macro issue of the housing bubble, the true cause of the financial crisis can be traced to banks’ incredibly risky policies regarding how and to whom they made large real estate loans and the insatiable greed that drove them to adopt these practices. In this analysis of the perfect storm that facilitated the financial meltdown, I

In what came to be known as the “Eurozone Crisis”, many peripheral countries, particularly Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain, put in place policies of fiscal consolidation, aimed at tax hikes and budget cuts, and structural reforms along the lines proposed by the EU leaders and the ECB. The large budget deficits and high sovereign debts