The Crucible Chapter 4 Dialectical Journal Essay

He picks up a piece of tan or beige stone, curved and smooth on one side but on the other it was rugged and damaged, like an old man's flesh. At one time could have possibly been part of an old

First, the reading states that the carved stone balls were weapons used in hunting or fighting. The professor opposes this point by saying that all the waepons from the neolithic period like the arrow have signs of war around the weapons head like cracks, these signs mean that they have been used before in fighting, while the carved stone balls don't have these signs, but they are very well preseved without any damage.

William Golding contends in his novel “Lord of the flies” that the dangers of evil which lurk inside all of us savagery are through the character Roger. When one considers the word savagery, specifically within the frame of william golding’s novel, savagery comes as a result of freedom and no consequences. In the novel when Roger gets stuck on the island he isn’t certainly evil in fact he is a very shy kid . Although as the story progresses we see him descending into it evilness and savagery. We see that when Roger is walking on the beach with mauris after kicking the kids sandcastle, “Roger stooped, picked up a stone, aimed threw it at henry….threw it to miss.”(Chapter 4) This was a sign of savagery growing inside of him. He wanted to hit

1. “Women killed Hungry Joe. His response to them as sexual beings was one of frenzied worship and idolatry. They were lovely, satisfying, maddening manifestations of the miraculous, instruments of pleasure too powerful to be measured, too keen to be endured, and too exquisite to be intended for employment by the base, unworthy man. He could interpret their naked presence in his hands only as a cosmic oversight destined to be rectified speedily, and he was driven always to make what carnal use of them he could in the fleeting moment or two he felt he had before Someone caught wise and whisked them away” (52).

(Golding pg 76) In this quote Ralph, the most civil of them all, feel the need and want to “squeeze and hurt”. On the other hand the savages can be civil. “There was a space round Henry, perhaps six yards in diameter, into which (Roger) dare not throw. Here, invisible yet strong, was the taboo of the old life.”

He “led the way straight through the castles, kicking them over, burying the flowers, scattering the chosen stones,” only to remain, “watching the littluns.” Maurice, however, “still felt the unease of wrongdoing.” Jack’s only fault was yearning for power, which corrupts those who wield it. Roger is corrupted and malevolent without ever thirsting for this power, and is therefore more evil than Jack. Roger keeps to himself, much like Simon, and remains consistently evil throughout the novel. Near the beginning, he “picked up a stone, aimed, and threw it at Henry-threw it to miss,” held back by “the taboo of the old life.” Later, he did not miss and “with a sense of delirious abandonment, leaned all his weight on the lever,” releasing a huge boulder and killing Piggy. Under the weight of the boulder, “the conch exploded into a thousand white fragments and ceased to exist.” The main symbol for the democracy, equality and justice was indirectly destroyed by Roger. To him, “Ralph was a shock of hair and Piggy a bag of fat,” thus dehumanizing and objectifying them. When Sam and Eric were cornered by Jack’s group of savages, Roger demonstrates his enjoyment for hurting others by “[advancing] upon them as one wielding a nameless authority.” It was not for the sake of supremacy or control, but for unbridled sadistic pleasure. When Ralph finds Sam and Eric, they say that Roger is “a terror”. He also points out that Jack is a terror, but the twins respond with “only

Rodor staggered towards the Jericho Stone on its golden stand. This was a piece of thick, pure gold that looped its way round and round the stone enclosing it in a golden cell. He saw the stone swelling, pulsing, and glowing brighter and brighter until it reached a brilliant shine, like the sun on a summer’s day. Rodor, as he looked into it, was blinded and cried out in anguish. The echoing sound swelled to a momentous finishing and he fell to the ground and was still.

The yelling ceased, and Samneric lay looking up in quiet terror. Roger advanced upon them as one wielding a nameless authority” (202). Roger’s innocence drastically changes throughout the novel and his aggressive nature slowly progresses. When Roger “edged by the chief” it is as if he is threatening Jack. Roger has gained such a strong lust for power and authority over others and

The author uses the Stones as a way to differentiate love and materialistic

First, the passage mentions that the object had been utilized as weapons in hunting or fighting. However, the lecturer argues that Carved stone balls were very damageable and in that era some other weapons such as arrows were used.

This is found directly in a scene between Roger and Henry, “Roger stooped, picked up a stone, aimed, and threw it at Henry—threw it to miss… Here, invisible yet strong, was the taboo of the old life,” (Golding, 62). Here Roger adheres to a categorical imperative, following the unspoken laws that had been previously conditioned by the society of the modern world he had been a part of. It is this adherence that keeps the situation from devolving into a place of savagery. By the time Roger enters Merridew’s savage society, this part of him is long gone as is evidenced by him dropping the large boulder that kills Piggy. As time progresses, it becomes abundantly clear that this use of Kant’s categorical imperative is essential to the society remaining intact. A thought occurs to Ralph after calling an assembly to discuss rule enforcement that ultimately failed that truly highlights the situation, “the world, that understandable and lawful world, was slipping away,” (Golding, 91). It is due to the refusal of the other boys to follow established rules and subsequently the lack of enforced law on the island that lead to the decay of the society and the eventual emergence of a second, more savage society. It is the emergence of this second society, Jack Merridew taking de facto leadership, that properly puts into perspective the true impact the actions of members of a society have. Even before Merridew breaks away, it is clear that the mindset adopted by him and his consequent actions are due cause for civilized society to become disordered, “’I mean… what makes things break up like they do?’… ‘I dunno Ralph, I expect it’s him.’ … ‘Jack?’… ‘Jack,’”

When I first read that quote, I was confused and did not comprehend at first how the surroundings of a monument would help interpret the piece itself. This book begins to unravel the mystery behind Stonehenge with the discussion of the first settlement and use of agriculture. He explores the possibilities of other monuments influencing the Stonehenge, but always keeps in mind that the Stonehenge people were oriented towards ritual and symbolic

Ortega begins the article by explaining differences between man and stone. “The stone is given its existence; it need not fight for being what it is – a stone in the field. Man has to be himself in spite of unfavorable circumstances; that means he has to make his own existence at every single moment. He is given the abstract possibility of existing, but not the reality,” (Ortega 267) this is a strong claim to state but it is evident that man’s being and nature are not completely the same, “because man’s being and nature’s being do not fully coincide,” (Ortega 267). Man is not a rock; he is not given existence and cannot depend on the nature around him to define his existence. It is necessary for man to create his own existence at every moment, because without this created existence, although he is physically standing there, there is a real debate on whether or not he truly exists. This initial idea is broad, but with later thought it can be recognized that the stone was created and

“Although the villagers had forgotten the ritual and lost the original black box, they still remembered to use stones. The pile of stones the boys had made earlier was ready; there were stones on the ground with the blowing scraps of paper that had come out of the box Delacroix selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands and turned to Mrs. Dunbar. "Come on," she said. "Hurry up."( (Jackson)

Carter Filipiak Mrs. Convery World Literature 28 September 2015 Vivid Language Used in “The Stones” “I love to go out on summer nights and watch the stones grow”, says Richard Shelton, Author of the short story “The Stones”. This is just one example of the vivid language he uses to put an image in the readers head. “The Stones”, is a story about young stones, old stones, and stones with all different types of personalities. The author uses various types of figurative language in the story, such as personification and Metaphors. The author also uses strong diction to give the story more meaning.