preview

The Crucible Movie Analysis

Decent Essays
Open Document

Any film nominated for Golden Globes, Oscars, British Academy Film Awards, and many other prestigious awards typically signifies the movie is a spectacular masterpiece. Nicholas Hytner’s 1996 film, The Crucible, fits this description, and in many people’s opinion portrays the characters of The Crucible better than Arthur Miller’s original 1952 written play. Unlike the written text, the adaptation of the play allows the audience to visually see the emotions behind each character, and from this, one can easily characterize each person in, hopefully, the way Miller intended. The film version of The Crucible best portrays the characters, especially that of John Proctor, due to its brilliant actors and actresses, their on-screen chemistry, and the cinematography of the film itself (IMDb.com).
It was intended by Arthur Miller that John Proctor be the hero of his screenplay, and throughout the play his character struggles internally with his religion and his sins, which he has difficulty accepting and taking responsibility for. By the end of the play, John Proctor comes to terms with his past actions, where he stands with God, and finally finds peace in the end in a way no one would expect. English actor, Daniel Day-Lewis plays the role of this complex character in the film, and he does an unforgettable job portraying Proctor as Miller wanted him to be seen. Not only is Day-Lewis actually the son-in-law of Arthur Miller, but he expresses every raw emotion Proctor was feeling and

Get Access