The Current Status Of Electronic Health Record

Electronic health records (EHR) are health records that are generated by health care professionals when a patient is seen at a medical facility such as a hospital, mental health clinic, or pharmacy. The EHR contains the same information as paper based medical records like demographics, medical complaints and prescriptions. There are so many more benefits to the EHR than paper based medical records. Accuracy of diagnosis, quality and convenience of patient care, and patient participation are a few examples of the

Electronic Health Records (EHR) are just as the name implies, a computerized record of a patient’s current and past medical history. It is maintained by the provider over time, and includes all the key administrative clinical data pertinent to a person’s care (The Government & Health IT, 2013). EHRs can provide a medical story for healthcare providers of the patient’s life. They contain a patient’s medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, immunization dates, allergies, radiology images, and laboratory and test results (What is an electronic health record?, 2013). Unlike paper records, electronic records are easier to retrieved with the click of a button. In some cases, the time it takes

Use of an EHR benefits patients and their families or caregivers, clinicians and the organizations that use them. Our Week 4 Lesson reminds us of the benefits of EHR has to make easier access to information and the potential to simplify clinician workflow (CCN, 2016). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid report the many benefits and disadvantages of the implementation and utilization of the Electronic Health Record. These advantages, “the ability to support other care-related activities directly and indirectly through various interfaces, including evidence-based decision support, quality management and outcomes reporting as well as data accessibility and timeliness will enable providers to make better decisions and provide better care (CMS.gov, 2012). The

Researchers have found a containt between certain EHR systems and and higher rates of errors to medical records because of poorly designed systems or the users weren’t trained properly (menachemi and Collum, 2011). If the users aren’t trained properly they are most likely not inputting the information properly, leading to patients medical records to be incorrect. ACCORDING to Menachemi and Collum (2011), it is shown that have EHR within the hospital can lead to nurses and doctors to become over dependent on technology. Clinics and hospitals should be sure that basic medical care can still be provided without any technology incase a time comes when systems are down. EHRs can also lead to a change in power structure within the organization because certain jobs will no longer be needed (Menachemi and Collum, 2011). It may also cause physicians to lose their autonomy, the ability to function in an independent fashion, in making decisions for the patients “ because an EHR blocks the ordering of certain tests or medications” (Menachemi and Collum, 2011). Doctors and nurses need to make sure they know how to use the systems properly so they do not input or information improperly. They also need to ensure that they can do certain basic procedures without the use of

In 2009, one of the largest US initiatives to date put place under Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act was electronic health records. The main initiative of this act was to encourage widespread use of electronic medical records also known as EHR. EHRs are defined as “a longitudinal electronic record of patient health information generated by one or more encounters in any care delivery setting. (Menachmi, 2011) Government continues to incentivize the industry with new healthcare objectives based around quality and technology. One can only think that the basis of these initiatives start with the electronic medical records as the foundation. The implementation of electronic medical records can result in many

The biggest challenge that presented itself to the design of EHR systems in the 90s was creating user heterogeneity with the advent of the personal computer. The differences in the nature of

Since EHR is a technical addition to the medical healthcare therefore, it is necessary to have individuals that are well equipped with the implementation of EHR. Over here the training and development of the practitioners and nurses is necessary so that they can have grip over the technology. The trainers need to be good teachers because eventually the implementation of EHR and its success entirely depends upon the method of training the healthcare participants. If the execution of the EHR at the healthcare is designed and planned it can actually reap in profitable results (Amanda, 2012).

EHRs are designed to reach out beyond the health organization that originally collects and compiles the information. They are built to share information with other health care providers, such as laboratories and specialists, so they contain information from all the clinicians involved in the patients care. Electronic health records minimizes errors than paper records, according to experts. Communication between physicians can be greatly improved with the use of EHR, allowing each party to access to a patient’s medical history rather than a snapshot-type overview from a current visit.(Seidman & Garrett,

The use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) has increase from 20% in 2002 (Burt C, Sisk JE. Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? Health Aff (Millwood).2005;24(5):1334–43.) to 50% in 2011 (Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC, Cai B.Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States,

Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Electronic Medical Record (EMR) have become an important component of modern health care. Nowadays, more and more countries including developed countries and some developing countries have implemented EMR in hospitals or clinics to provide better care to patients.

Electronic health records are increasingly being implemented in many countries. For the longest time, Canada has always needed an easily accessible, speedy, efficient, and cost-effective method to access information. Electronic health records, also known as EHRs, have been introduced to be a secure and private lifetime method to that record and provide a person’s health history (Saher, CA et al., 2010). It is known to be a new division of health care, in which paper documents have been transformed into easily accessible digital documents. These types of records are made up information from many sources, which include doctors, pharmacies, hospitals, clinics, etc. (Saher, CA et al., 2010). Information from these records are considered to be important, as it helps for future treatments, and it can be easily accessed by health care providers (Saher, CA et al., 2010). EHRs aims to be much easier and quicker compared to old-fashion paper. The main purpose of an electronic health records is to improve the health care system, such as being organized and up to date manner, as well as sharing information between health care groups without any problems to occur. Although the benefits seem to be reasonable enough to be considered a replacement, however, there are many barriers to be considered when using EHRs as a replacement from paper documents. This means that this new concept can also lead to challenges, such as privacy issue, the impact on the environment, changes in

Between EHR benefits and its disadvantages, it has been very difficult for decision makers to make a decision regarding such systems. An evaluation is needed in order for decision makers to pick a side; whether they support EHR implementation or not.

Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a method to restore patient health information, such as patient’s demographic, progress note, diagnosis, medication and so on, through electronic form (Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, 2017). The benefit of EHR adoption is not only to replace paper work, but also assist with data creation, management, and sharing of patients’ health information to different providers and organizations across various states (Health IT, 2016). According to the HIMSS (2017), hospitals can be more effectively in evidence-based decision making, quality management, and outcome reporting under EHR systems. The aim of this paper is to explore the five largest hospitals in New York City, the EHR systems that

An EHR will directly affect clinicians’ care. Therefore, they need to see active participation by Johnson, CNO, and Towriss, CMO, for a successful transition. Without a high level of contribution and guidance, front-line caregivers may resent the change and increased workload it represents. Johnson and Towriss need to assume duties that result in improved communication between clinicians and IT staff, which will enhance the EHR program. They need to get involved in the implementation process and reiterate support for the effort. Johnson and Towriss must send a clear message that the use of an EHR system will become a condition of practicing medicine at SMC. Furthermore, they can best develop support by demonstrating that the EHR process has sufficient funding.

The five qualities of adopting new technology relative advantage, compatibility, simplicity, trialability, and observable results will be examined and reviewed (Roger, 2003). An approach that addresses each element will be considered during the meetings with staff and implementation of the EHR.