Space Debris Essay

Pollution is now out of this world because according to “Cleaning up the Space Junk” “the National Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA has estimated that about 22,000 pieces of this pollution are as large as a softball and about 500,000 of them are closer to the size of a marble and there are possibly hundreds of millions of smaller pieces are also floating around the planet”.Based on the video “Space Junk” “the fail of Cosmos 54 led to fear of radioactive contamination from its nuclear power packs and that then confirmed that space junk can and will fall to Earth.And smaller pieces travel at an incredibly fast speed 17,000 to 21,000 mph so the damage that little tiny piece can do is potentially enormous.All

According to NASA, the amount of pieces of space debris currently orbiting the Earth numbers in the hundred-thousands. This vast array of inoperative man-made objects has accumulated over several decades of space travel and exploration and has come from a variety of sources. The majority of space debris in orbit consists of defunct satellites or fragments left behind from collisions between satellites or explosions that were caused by unused fuel remaining in the tanks of defunct satellites. A fraction of the space debris also comprises of rocket stages and other launch hardware. NASA and the US Department of Defense put in a considerable amount of time and energy into tracking and cataloguing such space debris that orbits the Earth. This begs the question: why is the issue of space debris so important?

Although space junk may seem trivial,it is in fact crucial in terms of today's concern over everyday life. Apparently Nasa has just been throwing it out the window into our atmosphere, which is causing a gigantic problem. Some experts say there are just some things like satellites they cannot take back to earth. They say that they would only do it in in rare cases. If they take the things up there how come they can't take back it down to earth. They are trying to find a way to bring the trash back.

Neil Armstrong 's 1969 lunar landing was one of humanity 's greatest accomplishments. Since then, we have found that an infinite supply of knowledge and resources await us just outside our atmosphere. Today, however, critics are beginning to argue more and more that the cost of space exploration is too high, and therefore new technological developments should be left to the private sector. Whether funded privately or by the government, funding of space exploration is imperative because NASA is essentially the only agency with the technological capabilities to support aircraft manufacturing, air safety and air transportation. Space exploration has also resulted in remarkable innovations that has played a key role in aeronautics research, preventative medicine, and allows scientists to study asteroids, along with other space debris and their impacts on Earth.

Last week marked a time for important government decisions and controversy. Between December eight and December eleventh, President Trump authorized NASA to send men back to the moon, members of the Democratic Party publicly called for President Trump’s resignation due to allegations of sexual misconduct, the Port Authority bus terminal underwent a terrorist attack, and the White House claimed that Trump’s immigration plans could have prevented the Port Authority attack. Additionally, between December twelfth and thirteenth, the Federal Reserve lifted interest rates, the CHIP program is promised renewal, the House and Senate announced some facets of their tentative tax deal, and Doug Jones won the Alabama special election.

Space junk is a very important because it can cause harm, not only to NASA, but to Earth and everyone on Earth. Scientists are trying their best to find a way to stop it from doing this, but with people that are as smart as them in one room trying to make a decision is not easy.

As these orbital objects continue to add up, space is growing all the more crowded, and presently, space enthusiasts are becoming increasingly concerned with the junk left by defunct satellites, spent rocket stages, and even small bits of trash leftover from old explosions. In recent years, attention-seeking news media developed a controversy about the topic of space junk, creating a misinformed and panicked populous which distrusts the information provided by space enthusiasts and legitimate space agencies. However, when provided the right information, both sides can agree that space junk is an issue that needs to be handled, but not one that will cause a major

With the dispatch of the Soviet satellite Sputnik in 1957, humankind started its adventure to achieve the stars. Yet, in spite of the fact that the primary test in space came back to Earth after just three short months, it commenced a progression of dispatches that propelled individuals around the globe as well as filled the locale with huge lumps of latent metal.

The size of the debris particles determines how much potential damage it can cause. Particles ranging from 1 to 10 centimeters in diameter are observable and if a collision occurs, it would have the potential to damage a satellite (NASA Orbital Debris Program Office, 2012).. Although there are millions of smaller sized particles in the atmosphere, they do not affect humans on Earth because they can burn whereas the larger particles have the potential to fall onto Earth and bring about a catastrophe. Most fallen objects include spacecraft particles slowly spiral down toward Earth and land in the ocean, which makes up 70% of Earth (Urry, 2014). It is rare that these debris will fall onto the land on Earth due to the lesser area. But, according to NASA, an average of one piece of orbital debris falls towards Earth every year for the past 50 years (NASA Orbital Debris Program Office, 2012). This means that the probability of causing a catastrophic event to occur on Earth is actually a low chance. The main

“I am proud to be part of a species where a subset of its members willingly put their lives at risk to push the boundaries of our existence,” said by Neil deGrasse Tyson. With this quote you, the reader, can clearly see the impact that space exploration has had on society but, why should the United States continue to fund the space program? Well, the United States should continue to fund the space program because, it can improve the medical field, improve weather forecasting to keep more citizens safe, and it can provide breakthroughs in technology and within society. With this, I believe the the united states would continue funding the space program and allowing us to push the limits of space.

Tony liked to daydream about space rocks. To understand him, it would take a mystic type of human being. He suffered from a mental disorder called schizophrenia. Taking medications for his disability often helped. Having to sit on the porch step all the time in front of the house made him feel kind of empty on the inside. All so his mom could peep at him through the screen door to make sure he stayed near the house.

On July 20, 1969, outside our Earth in the cold, and darkness of space, the first humans landed on the moon, Neil Armstrong said, “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” Ever since the moon landing the space program took off, through failure and success we discovered things, advanced our technology and more. Learning from previous mistakes and making sure that they did not happen again. The space program has allowed for the world to grow in technology, unite different people, and teach people about the world we live in. Since the exploration of space has greatly benefited the world with advanced technology and knowledge, along with more cooperation between countries, I believe that the space program should continue.

Space has become a big part of everyday life without anyone realizing it. With a growing understanding of space, people are able to learn new things and send humans and other objects out of the atmosphere and solar system. Space exploration has an important history and future involving advanced technology and engineering.

Many project managers focus so intensely on the effort and events around creation of the deliverables that they had forgotten about the other elements associated in making the project a success. Technical risk may lead to possible impact that could have occur in a project when an implementation does not work as wanted. Risks can be in terms of major and minor effects on projects. Technical risks can be a big problem if it is not handled properly. The NASA did not handled risks effectively where it may blow up any time. The night before the space shuttle was launched, a contractor and five engineers had informed managers to hold the activity as the engineers discovered the O ring rubber seals, a vital component of the shuttle had failed a few times in sealing from bad weathers. If the technical risks are not taken into consideration, it would provide sufficient impact towards the overall process that may even lead to death and injuries as similar to the Space Shuttle incident in year 1986.

Due to the large number of space exploration projects, a large belt of debris has formed that can be hazardous to other operational spacecraft. As engineers, we have an ethical responsibility to prevent pollution of Earth’s atmosphere. We have learned a hard lesson on the value of environment from right here on Earth. Trends show that the debris belt circling the Earth will only get bigger, and become more hazardous to spacecraft.