The Death Penalty Is Justified

“Capital punishment is as fundamentally wrong as a cure for crime as charity is wrong as a cure for poverty (Henry Ford).” Death is a natural event that will occur eventually in life. No one is meant to live forever and that is normal. However, no one living on Earth should determine who should die based on the mistakes an individual makes. Who has the right to tell when and where a person should die? People make mistakes each and every day due to the fact that we were not created to be perfect. An argument that has been discussed throughout the years is the issue with capital punishment. According to US Legal.com, “A death penalty is the sentence of execution for murder and some other capital crimes (serious crimes, especially murder, which are punishable by death).”There are currently 32 states that use the death penalty, while 18 states have abolished the death penalty. The death penalty is not only inhuman, but a costly project that affects the economy. Supporters of capital punishment believe capital punishment gives the society more power, discourages new crimes that are related to crimes committed by the accused and provides justice or closure for victims. Those against capital punishment are against it based on the cost of the punishment, the inhumanity of the punishment and the innocent are not safe from the death penalty. I am against the death penalty based on the reasons of those against it. However, I agree with the reasons for those who are in support of it,

Convicted criminals should be limited in their appeals and there should be no stays of execution to draw out their incarceration. Executions should be carried out forthrightly, without delay and with sufficient publicity to get the message across to other criminals. To see a reduction in crime based on the death penalty, society must realize that criminals will, no matter what, be put to death if particular crimes are committed. They need to realize and that there is no hope of absolution. The same that is true for capital punishment, is true in general. Though retributive and utilitarian principles of justice are independent from one other; and though they can sometimes lead us to same conclusion on what is right and wrong. Both principles are needed because there is no assurance that the decision is the right one, without a system of checks and

One of the first issues that are always brought up concerning the death penalty is its morality. Those for the death penalty, they addressed the fact that the opposition would suggest that the death penalty is inherently immoral because no one or one government should take someone’s life. In the cases sentences to the

Proponents of the death penalty also view it as a deterrent to crime. (“Same old”, 1990). Just by having the possible punishment of death as an end result to a heinous crime has lowered the murder rate in some states. The feeling is that the more executions you have, the lower the homicide rate you will have. Not to mention the innocent lives you will save. Supporters of capital punishment will cite studies showing that murderers who are allowed to live will inevitably kill again. Studies have shown that murderers awaiting their death penalty sentence to be carried out have killed correction officers, knowing there could be no additional fate assigned to them.

Many people argue whether or not the death penalty should still be a form of punishment in the legal systems of the fifty states of the United States of America. People who are against the death penalty say that this form of punishment should not exist, because it is inhumane. Alongside that argument, people also say that it is in direct violation of the basic human rights. Not to mention, they also see it as an outdated punishment that existed in less civilized times. They say that this kind of punishment should not exist in modern times. Supporters of the death penalty beg to differ. They see it as a justified form of punishment. People who are given the death penalty have committed murder, so supporters don’t see it as a problem when a convicted murderer is killed. This is the source of justification for many supporters of the death penalty. Supporters also say that capital punishment provides closure to the victims family. It is also said that it is a way to deter possible copycats which would save more lives, by sacrificing the perpetrators. I am a supporter of the death penalty, it should remain.

“Man…I’m not…something’s wrong,” said Clayton Lockett as he lay on the execution bed. He had begun to twitch only seconds after the drugs were administered, and then the convulsions became worse.

One hundred sixty-eight innocent people, including nineteen children were brutally killed. On April 9, 1995, Timothy McVeigh vengefully bombed the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City (Gorman). He never expressed any remorse for his actions. In an interview with The Guardian, McVeigh states, “If I’m wrong then I’ll adapt, improvise and overcome. But if there is a hell, then I’ll be in good company with a lot of fighter pilots who also had to bomb innocents to win the war,” (Gorman). More recently, a common trend has been the disapproval of the death penalty, exhibited by the thirteen percent drop in the number of people on death row since Spring of 2005 (Death Penalty Info. Center). Life without parole has become the preferred sentence of unavoidable capital punishment. The death penalty has frequently been viewed as inhumane. However, isn’t lack of remorse for such vile acts inhumane? In cases of intentional murder in which the perpetrator has no remorse, it is justifiable to further implement this type of punishment in order to achieve justice for the family of the victim, prevent any undeserved benefits of living in the prisons, and avoid giving prisoners false hope while putting them through a pointless, monotonous sentence.

In many eyes across the country the death penalty is widely criticized. The state of Texas has the death penalty, whereas nineteen other states in the United States do not including the state Maine. The death penalty is a way for the states to declare that they don’t tolerate the heinous crimes that some individuals commit. In Texas there are numerous ways that one could be sentenced to death row. Murdering a police officer or firefighter in the line of duty and if the individual knowing that they are a police officer or firefighter, murder for hire or promise of pay, to employ another to commit murder, murder during the act of or attempted act of kidnapping, burglary, robbery, aggravated sexual assault, arson, obstruction, retaliation or terroristic threat, murder during escape or attempted escape from a penal institution, murder during incarceration of a correctional officer or anyway associated with the plan to do so, murder while in prison serving a life sentence or a ninety-nine year sentence for a conviction of aggravated kidnapping, aggravated sexual assault, or aggravated robbery, murder of more than one person during the same crime or in the same fashion over an extended period of time, murder of a minor under the age of ten, last but not least the murder in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of another person as a judge. What is murder? Murder in my mind is subjective to make my point I will posit the following scenario; a sniper overseas sees

The author’s views are very one-sided, and do not acknowledge any counter arguments to his own beliefs. He claims that the death penalty is morally justified and does not provide any proper support for this claim; not even biblical reasoning which ultimately should not be held in upmost esteem in the secular law of the United States. Many of his implied claims are rash generalizations based on specific cases, such as the

Should the Death Penalty be a widely accepted practice by the judicial system in each state? The ability to control the population of those who violate the laws of the country is a valuable asset we as a society have evolved into making a permanent aspect of our judicial system. Capital Punishment is described as "the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime" ("capital punishment"). Despite Capital Punishment being in use for hundreds of years, there is still tension behind the idea of whether or not it is morally right to practice amongst a civilized society. Since colonial days around thirteen-thousand people have been tried, deemed guilty, and executed by the state ( White, Deborah). There is a point a person crosses where death seems to be the only fitting punishment for the crime. The United States judicial system has evolved to possess a low tolerance for crime since the potential criminals have been inclined to commit more outrageously awful crimes. Instead of prisons taking the guilty into rehabilitation for the rest of their lives, it’s proved more effective to execute the worst criminals providing both a fitting punishment and also have ridden the world of certain criminals who have shaken the society in which they reside. The death of the guilty provides closure for the victim 's family, demonstrates government involvement and serves as the ultimate punishment for deserving criminals.

The death penalty is often thought of to be a deterrence to murder. The idea is that criminals are supposed to think what their consequences could be before committing the crime which in this case would be the death penalty. However, what are the chances that a criminal is actually going to stop and think about whether or not the death penalty could be a consequence. If criminals want to engage in violence, they are going to. Consequences are not going to alter that state of mind. According to Richard Dieter, director of the Death Penalty Information Center, police officers all over the country “do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder” (Dieter). In fact, states in which the death penalty is legal are the states with

Imagine, just for a moment, a country where the government kills innocent people. Where people kill others for having black skin, the government kills the mentally ill, the government spends billions of dollars killing individuals. Where does this country thrive? Maybe a small third-world foreign country ruled by a cruel and wicked government? Probably an obscure country that no one has ever heard of? No. Believe it or not, the country is the United States of America. The death penalty, Americas’ most ruthless punishment for crime, has always had people overlook it in society. Those who murder in cold blood get the death penalty; but it does not keep people from committing crimes. Billions of dollars, all wasted killing just a few individuals. The death penalty has also claimed many innocent lives.The death penalty should not thrive in American society because it has no deterrence against crime, it could save America billions of dollars, and innocent people die frequently.

I strongly believe in the death penalty because murderers have no place of sympathy in my conscience as taking an innocent person’s life with premeditated thought is just blatantly cruel. Ideally for me, the death penalty should be applied to the irrevocably and rightfully accused for the most heinous crimes. The death penalty promotes moral justice, a certain degree of safety, and rightly placed compassion in society.

Many nations have criminals to punish, but what’s changing is how they punish their criminals. Most countries, even some states, have come to the realization that the death penalty is an unfair, inhumane, unconstitutional, and irreversible punishment that’s much too severe and is an unfit punishment for a fair and just society. Internationally, the U.S. ranks fifth in terms of the number of prisoners put to death, putting America in such ill-esteemed company as the regimes of China, Iran, North Korea, and Yemen.

“Progress lies not in enhancing what is, but in advancing toward what will be” (Khalil Gibran). Every day the world is advancing. From how humans communicate and travel, to how humans learn, or utilize technology. Everything is being critiqued and criticized in some way, shape, or form. Whether it is with clothing, cars, or new ways to punish people, the world is constantly coming up with something new. The death penalty has been around for the longest time. It is used to punish “wrongdoers” (“Origins of Capital Punishment”). The death penalty takes the individuals lives to “pay for the crimes” that they did. The logic statement behind the death penalty is, “A life for a life” (“Origins of Capital Punishment”).