The Death Penalty Is Justified

The death penalty has been considered one of the most severe punishments by governments. However, recently, many people have rebelled against the death penalty. The death penalty is an act that is similar to being ruled under fascism instead of democracy. Under the rule of democracy, citizens are responsible for the acts of other fellow citizens, which can be inferred that crime is caused by the lack of responsibility in society. The victim's loved ones suffer due to the victim's death. It is understandable that they would want the murderer dead, but society often does not work that way. People need to think on behalf of the society.

Imagine that you are arrested and going to be tried for a crime that you did, or did not, commit. What if you cannot afford the cost of a lawyer? Will you be able to handle the physical and mental toll that all of the appeals have on a person? The death penalty, or capital punishment, is one of the most debated topics in America. It has been used for centuries, but many claim it to be barbaric, and want the practice to end all together. The death penalty should only be used in cases where there is absolute evidence that the criminal is guilty, because life in prison can be an alternative, there are many flaws in the justice system, and it can be a cruel and unusual punishment.

Texas has the infamous reputation of carrying the death penalty. From 1967-1976 there were no executions at all in America. In 1977 the death penalty was reinstated when Gary Gilmore was convicted of murder. Texas has conducted more executions then any state and has become the mecca, if you will, for the death penalty. “The state of Texas has executed 518 people since 1982. Executions peaked in Texas in 2000, when 40 people were put to death.” (Statistics Bureau) An inmate can be put on death row only if he commits capital murder. Texas law only recognizes capital murder as one of these 9 offenses; “a murder of a peace officer or firefighter acting in the line of duty. Murder during the commission of; kidnapping, burglary, robbery, aggravated sexual assault, arson, obstruction

Capital punishment is a global issue and it is a question of life and death. Capital punishment is when the government kills a person by using legal means, and sometimes it is called the death penalty. The death penalty is the prosecution of people who have been found guilty of malefaction that is measured to be worthy of capital punishment. Capital punishment has been practiced for many years, in the United States and across the world. In the United States, each state has the right to accept if they will use capital punishment for committed crimes by an individual in their state or not. There are many factors that should not be ignored because there has to be actual evidence and people who can testimony on exactly what happened, but that is not what happens. As Stephen mentions, “America is still one of the world’s Big Six when it comes to putting its citizens to death – along with China, Iran, Pakistan, Iraq and Sudan. Gallup says that around 65 per cent of Americans still favor the death penalty, and only one of the 2008 presidential frontrunners has the courage to oppose it” (32-33). The death penalty is practiced in the United State, but few states have abrogated it, including Minnesota. States like Texas still practice the death penalty in the United States. According to Fuller, … Texas has executed 876 people since 1964, and it is one of the States that practice the death penalty more than any other State . The state accounts for nearly 40 percent of executions in

Death Penalty is a sticky situation. Death Penalty was alive for a long time and used in many cultures and religions. People in the medieval times, used to use it a lot as well as Europeans, and Britain’s. They really didn’t know that much about what was fair and wasn’t fair as well as how to execute a person. Multiple times in the media they wouldn’t state how someone would be executed because even they believed that the way they executed the person wasn’t fair. Death Penalty was usually used back then for serious crimes. If you would have an affair with your son you would get burned or even worse at most times. As you went forward in time it would be rare for you to get death penalty especially in this time. Death Penalty started to die out

Murder is defined as the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. People who commit murder are usually thrown in Death Row and are executed. With this the people of the U.S. realise what they are doing and reduce the rate of murders in the country. “For instance a 2003 study by Emory University researchers of data from more than 3,000 counties from 1977 through 1996 found that each execution, on average, resulted in 18 fewer murders per county”(Muhlhausen). There was also a study in texas which showed that “each execution in Texas was associated with “Modest, Short-term reduction” in homicides, a decrease of up to 2.5 murders.”(Muhlhausen). This shows that with the Death Penalty and the executions that come from it less murders and homicides are present in society. Second of all the execution methods are supported across the nation by multiple

“Everything in the world, according to Aristotle, has a distinctive and essential function or activity.” (Weston p. 176) The function in this question is life itself. As morally rational beings the function of each life is defined. Each life in this question must be determined as a good or bad life. An innocent individual functions properly to be considered a virtuously good human being. A fetus has no good or bad to reside in its function because it has not lived in actual society. As a virtue ethicist the following must be considered: What is fair, what practices the most humility, and what is wise in the decision being made. The two lives at risk are the fetus and the person to be executed. It is not justifiable in any way to take a life. Life

In America, when someone is convicted of murder, they are put on trial to receive the death penalty. Some say it is what they deserve, while others say that it is a “cruel and unusual”punishment. States, such as New Jersey, have already banned the penalty, but some states are still pending on whether to have the penalty or to follow New Jersey’s path .

The Death Penalty is a controversial capital punishment which is given against a crime usually involving murder. It is controversial because many people are for it and many people are against it. Many people do not pay attention to the death penalty, because it is only legal in 31 out of the 50 states. Iowa is not one of those states. Life without parole is better, for many reasons. I am against the death penalty not only because it is simply wrong, but because it does not reduce the crime rates any and a lot of the times they wrong the execution.

Capital Punishment such as the death penalty should not be considered unethical or inhumane. The death penalty may be difficult to understand, but based on recent studies, it is nearly proven that the death penalty will save money along with many other benefits. By using the death penalty it will eliminate same person crimes, will cause fear, will save money, and will open a jail cell. Also, fewer criminals will provide more food, shelter and drinks for crimes that aren’t as bad. By using the death penalty it would benefit not only the jails, but the community by knowing that that person has no chance of escape or committing the same crime. It would save tax money, which would be used to shelter, feed and take care of this person. The death penalty should be an essential for America due to the many benefits. This extra money could be used for a good cause such as towards the homeless and starving.

The death penalty is a controversial issue in America because people disagree about whether it is a just punishment for capital crimes. Some Americans agree that the death penalty is a just punishment for capital crimes because inmates deserve suffering to death as a punishment. Other Americans disagree that the death penalty is a just punishment for capital crimes because a life for a life isn’t the Christian way. The third group of Americans believes the Amendments should acknowledge capital punishment for people accused of capital crimes. But, I argue that the death penalty is an unjust punishment for capital crimes because it is cruel, both physically and emotionally.

Executions have occurred in many forms for thousands of years. From Roman crucifixion to American lethal injection, capital punishments have one common goal: to offer retribution to a guilty party. However, in recent years, the death penalty has come under intense scrutiny. There are a great number of people who believe it should be abolished entirely and some who believe it should be used only in the most humane ways. In this paper, I will argue that the death penalty is justifiable in cases where a defendant is found guilty of murder.

One of the most server way of punishment that we all know is the death penalty. This penalty has been going around for years. To many people it might be the best way of punishing a person. On the other hand there are people who think that if you kill a person you should be sentenced to die as well. For me I would say it might not be the best way and it not working as many would like it. When choosing if you are for the death penalty you have to okay with an insect person dyeing or even a family member being in death row. I know that is something I would not be able to live with. Knowing that I have the choose of killing someone because of their crime.

The death penalty, or generally known as capital punishment, alludes to discipline by demise which is condemned by a state or lawful system. The primary at any point recorded execution to happen in the American Colonies was in 1608. Albeit correctional code contrasted from settlement to state, capital punishment was rehearsed in provinces like New York and New England. By the time the settlements picked up autonomy following the Revolutionary War, each of the "provinces had comparative demise statutes covering illegal conflagration, theft, injustice, kill, homosexuality, thievery, burglary, assault, horse-taking, slave resistance, and falsifying" (Stein 4). At the point when the First Congress assembled in 1790, they confirmed criminal statutes that permitted the death penalty for felonious violations, for example, assault and murder. The men of the First Congress likewise drafted the Bill of Rights what's more, U.S. Constitution. The Eight Amendment gives that "inordinate safeguard might not be required, nor exorbitant fines forced, nor pitiless and unordinary disciplines caused" ("U.S. Const."). When the Eight Amendment composed, there were at that point the death penalty laws set up. Along these lines, to supporters of capital punishment, the eighth amendment's disallowance of "merciless what's more, uncommon discipline" does not have any significant bearing to state supported executions. Because of the outrageous idea of the

It is the appropriate punishment for the crime committed. It stands alone because it is not dependent on any outside "empirical" justifications like deterrence, cost,