The Death Penalty Is Justified

The death penalty is supposed to deter murder and bring the justice that the murder families of the victims should be rewarded (Hyden). Although many scientific researches can conclude that it does not deter murder and the members of the murder victims’ family have rejected/rejecting the program because it retraumatizes them with long process of trials, appeals, and of course the media (Hyden). In contrast, a sentence of life in prison is certain and instant, allowing the families to move on knowing that the justice of the crime is being served. Comparing whether or not the death penalty should be legalized, the reasons as to why it shouldn’t be, are strong enough to change one person’s mind. The death penalty still should be illegal in the United States.

Not only does the death penalty not deter crime but it is also very expensive. The death penalty costs so much because of the appeal process. The appeal process is a very long and expensive process that can go on forever and costs the government millions. Many assume that abolishing the death penalty is wrong because it becomes unfair to the taxpayers because they think the cost is less than that of life in prison without parole. However life in prison is less expensive than the death penalty (Bedau). The death penalty is actually three times more than keeping a prisoner in prison for life without parole (Messerli). Death penalty trials are costly as well. “[S]tudies estimate that death penalty trials cost $1

When people are committing serious crimes such as murder, they aren't exactly thinking about whether they are going to face the death penalty. They are going to commit the murder regardless if that's what they had planned out. The claim that the death penalty can reduce further and similar crimes from occurring has not confidently been proven yet. A great number of those committing these crimes that can face death penalty are mentally ill, or having other issues in their lives, why end their lives instead of helping them? That doesn't completely process through my head completely. We can simply give them life in prison instead of gathering and wasting everyone's tax money to execute them. By the government "legally" ending someone's life, it begins to show other's that it is ok to murder others. That is not the message we should be sending to our people of

Also, the cost of the death penalty is really high, the cost of keeping someone in jail for life which will cost 600,000 per prisoner and just for one person to be put to death is would cost 2.3 million per prisoner. That is not a logical reason to kill someone then to keep them alive because the cost is three time less to keep a person alive in jail for life then to kill

Capital punishment raises the very difficult question whether or not it is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. People who oppose the death penalty often argue mistaken identity and wrongful conviction. They argue that long-term imprisonment is the better course of action, because it allows for the possibility that if a mistake was made in the conviction of a suspect, they would be able to correct it without ending the life of an innocent person. They also state that the threat of the death penalty is not a deterrent and people will commit crimes regardless, as often, criminal behavior is committed with the sense that they will not get caught. People who support the death penalty often state that the death penalty is a deterrent, far more than just prison time. They also argue that the death penalty could actually save lives because when a death penalty is carried out, there could be fewer crimes committed in the future.

The death penalty will always be a topic some people refuse to talk about. When in fact, it is a very serious topic and people should know how and why the death penalty is not justified. I believe the death penalty is not justified in the least bit because there are people sitting up in prison just living life because the state does not want to pay for an execution, or they find it to be morally corrupt. Personally if you committed a crime that resulted in someone dying then you deserves to die as well. The idea of killing another human does not sit well with people and that is mainly the

The death penalty has been a controversy in the United States justice system since its commencement (Bakken & Morris, 2010). Although extremely controversial, it has stood the test of time as the definitive penalty. Numerous countries are at present bring an end their death penalty law. Contrary to that, the United States has thirty eight out of its fifty states with death penalty still operational. It seems the United States needs the death penalty more than ever before due to rising rate of sever violent crimes across the nation. Statistics shows that since the early nineties roughly around 355 people have been put to death through death penalty and approximately 3300 are still waiting on death row. Similarly since 1976 around 552 felons have been put to rest through death penalty across the United States (Bakken & Morris, 2010). If you break these deaths down according to the methods utilized about three hundred ninety-four by lethal injection, one hundred forty-one by electrocution, eleven by gas chamber, three by hanging, and two by firing squad. Almost half of the 1976 executions have taken place within the last five years, which includes 52 that took place this year. Even though the death penalty has brought countless gooey criminals to end, the course of death penalty that it is founded on is inconsistent one.

In saying this it costs less money than to house feed and possibly treat medical conditions of criminals i’m not saying that it’s a scapegoat for saving money to not let them live. Ask the families of those lost of the Boston Marathon incident do those who did this horrible act be allowed to be fed better than children at our own public schools and a roof over their head when thousands of people in the U.S. are homeless. There are cases in which using the death penalty is deemed unconstitutional which supports people arguments against it but it does not apply for all cases. On the other hand other cases in which it is not used when it should be only exposes the corruption of our seemingly perfect just system. The death penalty should not be taken away and permanently stated as cruel and unusual

The United States has a long history with the death penalty. The “first recorded execution was in Jamestown in 1608” (“Death Penalty in America” 259). Since then, thirty five states have continued to use the death penalty. Now it can be considered a normal punishment and many people feel strongly about it, but maybe we should forget what we have done in the past and take a second look. The death penalty should not be used in the United States because it is too expensive, affects the poor and minorities more than others, and (even though many people think it is true) the death penalty does not deter crime.

One-hundred thirty million dollars are wasted each year on the death penalty, while it costs eleven million dollars for the same number of inmates per year to be put in prison for life without parole. The death penalty is when a person is executed by the state as a punishment which consists of lethal injection, electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging. The death penalty has been proven to consume a lot of time. For many cases, they will be denied, therefore wasting time and money that could be used for other problems that the country is facing. All this money that is wasted on the death penalty can be used for something useful like using the money for schools, hospitals, or other sections of the law enforcement like paying more

The death penalty has been around since the creation of justice systems. Today, 58 countries worldwide still enact it, the U.S. being one of them (Smith). In our country, the majority of the states still perform the death penalty at an astounding number of 32 (32 “States with the…”). It seems that the majority of the country believes that the death penalty is necessary, despite the other common belief that it is barbaric, outdated, and unconstitutional. With so much controversy over its use as a deterrent, it only gets more heated with people’s beliefs that either the entire world should use the death penalty, or nobody should use it at all. This leads to the question, “Should the death penalty be abolished throughout the entire U.S.?” While

Since the foundation of our nation the Death Penalty has been a way to punish prisoners that have committed heinous crimes, however since the turn of the 20th century the practice of Capital Punishment has been questioned on its usage in America and the world as a whole. The Death Penalty is used in America to punish criminals who have committed murders, or taken the life of an innocent person, and while the death penalty seems like it is doing justice to those who have killed others it is actually being used improperly in most situations, while also hindering our economy and is a means of ending more lives than necessary. The Death Penalty can be a valid source of punishment for criminals in the US however due to the misuse of this power by the government it is a huge detriment to our nation and the people that inhabit it. Because of the fact that Capital Punishment is used unfairly, and ineffectively in our nation it is an obsolete form of punishment and should have no place in the United States justice department.

If it were up to me, every murderer in this country would be put behind bars on death row and have their life taken from them just as they took the life of another. The guidelines of " an eye for an eye" go back thousands of years. Many countries still hold true to these guidelines. Although America doesn't follow the same as these countries, I believe when it comes to murder, they should.

The death penalty is faulty in its age and obsolete in its usage, and frankly should be put out of its misery. Capital punishment began its time in the Middle Ages, as people were executed for simply thinking differently from the rest of society. Even now, as we look back on history we find their ways of execution purely barbaric and malicious in all its forms. However, we continue to practice these forms of butchery; the traditional method of execution, hanging, is still an option available in certain states. In addition, couple of states also still allow firing squads, and the electrocution chairs has been readily used throughout the last century. The United States stands as one of the few developed nations with a death penalty still in place. There’s a reason most of the European countries have banned the usage of death as punishment, it’s cruel, unusual and barbaric! Is that the image the U.S. wants to portray the alling regions, one of intolerance and unforgiveness? The United States surpasses those barbaric ways, with its exceedingly advanced ways and state-of-the-art technology, yet it’s one of the only countries left of the Western world that still has

One reason why people either agree or disagree with the death penalty is because of the cost. Contrary to popular belief it is actually cheaper to imprison inmates for life than to execute them. According to a series of recent studies housing inmate for life without parole is ten of millions of dollars cheaper than executing them. The reason why it’s cheaper to house the inmates instead of executing them is because of the unique status of the death penalty within the US justice system. The Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases, including several levels of mandatory review after a death sentence is issued. These appeals process takes decades to complete. Since most of all states have had budget cuts and funding has been decreased it is now harder for states to get the required necessities to execute prisoners. So an increasing number politicians are now considering abolishing capital punishment in favor of life imprisonment, out of financial necessity. “It's 10 times more