The Death Penalty Is Not A Light Sentence

The pros for the death penalty are convicting are those with serious crimes such as torture rape and murder. Capital punishment over time has become more humane because it was done by injections instead of methods used in the past. Capital punishment is the only way to stop crimes. It is believed that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. Executing convicted murders, save society money instead of keeping them in jail. The death penalty is a just and proper way of handling convicted murderers. Family’s that have lost a loved one

Holly Near once said, “Why do we kill people, who kill people, to show that killing people is wrong?” The contradiction of the purpose for having the death penalty is superb. If the government believes that killing people is wrong, why do the government kill people who perform the act they are against? The death penalty is a punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. Capital crime can be classified as first degree murder, murder with special circumstances, rape with bodily harm or federal treason. The death penalty in America was influenced by the British. When British settlers came to America they bought the practice of capital punishment to each colony. Laws regarding the death

The specific aims and purposes of criminal law is to punish criminals, and prevent people from becoming future criminals by using deterrence. “Having a criminal justice system that imposes liability and punishment for violations deter.” (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). Criminal law

Criminal law is a construct of the government, enforced through tangible measures. In a democratic society, the government is elected by the citizens, and as such, laws are generally conceived with the aim to reflect whatever ethical or moral standards are presently acceptable. However, in order to be truly effective, some legislation must circumvent current sociological viewpoints in order to create laws that are genuinely in the best interests of society. This results in a delicate balancing act, as lawmakers attempt to weigh the views of the majority against the need for laws to be both reasoned and objective.

Capital punishment can be a tough topic to approach because people tend to have many different opinions on it. The death penalty is an advantage to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals. There is a huge difference in expenses of a lethal injection and life in prison. The death penalty can be an extremely beneficial tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to

“To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice.” -Desmond Tutu

The PROs and CONs of capital punishment both have some merit, no matter how controversial. CONs of capital punishment: Once someone is convicted of a crime punishable by death, it is close to impossible to be given a chance at a retrial. So on the off chance that a prisoner has been wrongly convicted; he/she will most likely die an innocent person. Another CON for capital punishment has to do with the subject of mental illness. Since 2006, Texas has made an effort to educate people on the subject of executing people with severe and documented mental illnesses.

If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers

The criminal justice system is a diverse system used around the globe. When in consideration of what the definition of the Criminal Justice system which is a law enforcement that is directly involved in apprehending, prosecuting, defending, sentencing, and punishing those who are suspected or convicted of criminal offenses ("criminal justice system: definition of criminal justice system in Oxford dictionary (American English) (US)," n.d.). Here have been many historical events that have led up to today’s way of handling the criminal trends. So many factors come into play. In order to control or make order of society you need laws and guidelines within the country and as well amongst the international countries.

Edwin and Paul hold incredible educational and research related criminal law and criminology. In this article, the authors discussed the effect of society’s communal condemnation of the criminal justice actions. The article is different to that of Adam and Aiden (2012). The article provides an in-depth analysis of the common law, federal law, environmental law and the criminal law. The research included results that indicated that the law prohibits and facilitates enforcement of the criminal law even if it means to wrongfully convict innocent individuals. In addition, the findings prove that there would always be perpetual temptations to violate the laws which result into corruption in policing” (Edwin and Paul, 2012). Furthermore, it also

In the argument for the death penalty, we take a look at “lex talionis”, the eye for an eye principle. Humans deserve praise for good deeds, and punishment for bad ones. This punishment could arguably range from the harshness of death, to a smack on the head, but in either example, the punishment must fit the crime. The eye for an eye principle ensures that no matter the crime, there is a just and understood punishment for all people. If we take the lex talion literally, and the criminals do deserve those punishments, but in turn, we must be prepared to deliver those punishments. Executing murderers prevents them from committing their crime again, and thus protects innocent victims. However, punishment does not apply itself to the culprit after

Ultimately, the very reality that comes as a result of over enforcing too many laws in turn creates a wide variety of problems within a society that show in a wide array of arenas. Similar to over regulation on behalf of the government in any sort of economic facet, over enforcing penial code creates a standard that lacks the trust bond necessary to a formidable republic and imposes heavy strain on the ability for nature’s moral code to drive the morality of the individual as well as the collective society. Larking cites an example noting that “If the penal code regulates too much conduct that is beyond the common law definitions of crimes or that is not inherently blameworthy, several problems arise: It becomes a formidable task for the average person to know what the law forbids, since the moral code offers no lodestar”; thus encouraging a guilty society given the fact the law enforcement officials will almost always have “probable cause” to make an arrest on anybody in any given circumstance (Larkin, 2013). Although it it’s difficult to deny the need for comprehensive criminal justice reform at the time in which it was carried out, there is no denying the interest of political influence in the manner in which the process was carried out. What is left now involves a system that enforces penalty that has become grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime and gravely effects the lives of its very own citizens in addition to placing an economic strain on the

On the other hand, some people view capital punishment as a wrongful unethical act. Just like the five pros of capital punishment, I will now explain five reasons behind the cons of capital punishment. First, it violations human rights. This is the main backbone for the cons against capital punishment. Everyone has the right to live a life, whether or they are a criminal or not. We as a government or society shouldn’t play GOD, with someone’s life. Second, it’s racial, ethics and social bias. Approximately 48% of the criminal in federal death row are African American, it is advocated that capital punishment is used racially ("5 Pros and 5 Cons of Capital Punishment - Listovative," 2017). The minorities of our society, is a victim of this punishment.

Putting people to death for committing murder makes other potential murderers think twice about killing someone. Capital punishment deters many murders every day. If all that had to be done was spend life in jail, getting free meals, having a roof over their head, and place to sleep at night, then killing

Although Jeffrey Reiman does not believe in using the death penalty as punishment for murder, he does support for it under certain distinct circumstances. In this case, responding to murder with death would demonstrate the idea of lex taliones. Reiman explains that the death penalty constitutes just punishment for some murders because murder is defined as “the killing of a legally innocent person by a nonauthorized individual” (White, 221). This makes murder a crime and to counter this crime, substantial punishments must be enforced. The basis for determining those punishments would result from a thorough analysis of lex taliones.