The Death Penalty Is Wrong

The death penalty has been considered one of the most severe punishments by governments. However, recently, many people have rebelled against the death penalty. The death penalty is an act that is similar to being ruled under fascism instead of democracy. Under the rule of democracy, citizens are responsible for the acts of other fellow citizens, which can be inferred that crime is caused by the lack of responsibility in society. The victim's loved ones suffer due to the victim's death. It is understandable that they would want the murderer dead, but society often does not work that way. People need to think on behalf of the society.

The majority of the United States’ perspective and value of capital punishment is to punish and kill prisoners, but with that system nothing is accomplished. Plus, there is no evidence that the death penalty reduces crime. In fact, most people on Death Row committed their crimes in the heat of passion, while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or while suffering from mental illness. They represent a group that is highly unlikely to make rational decisions based on a fear of future consequences for their

2008 murder rate in death penalty states was 41% higher than the non-death penalty states, 2009 the murder rate was 35% higher than the non-death penalty states (Cooper, 2011). As you can see capital punishment had no influence on preventing criminals from doing illegal acts. Therefore, all of the work and energy that goes into executing a criminal in the name of justice is illogical and ineffective.

Imagine Sierrah coming to court and hearing the judge say she is sentence to die. Imagine waking up every day in a cell waiting to die. There are no contact visits and she is in a cell 23 hours of the day by herself. She wait on death row for two decades until finally her day of execution comes. The guard comes up to cell twenty eight and says it’s time to go and takes her to the death house. She gets the last meal and says final goodbyes before being strapped to a gurney and asked to say her very last words. Family slowly watches her die and soon they take the body to prison cemetery. So, is the death penalty right for America? There have been people that were convicted of a crime they did not do. Innocent

Furthermore, the death penalty should be dismantled because research has shown that criminals have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to the death penalty when later evidence comes up that proves their innocence. To illustrate,

The death penalty is not slowing down crime, and the way it’s done now, or rather not done, is not serving justice to the families of these criminals’ crimes. It is borderline cruel and unusual punishment, which is in direct violation of the eighth amendment to the Constitution. Capital punishment and death row should be abolished completely. If we’re going to let most of the inmates on death row die of natural causes anyway There is absolutely no reason to keep this going any

Sister Helen Prejean, the writer of the biographical account “Dead Men Walking”, advocates strongly for the abolition of the death penalty. The non-fiction work is based on her experience being the spiritual advisor of Sonnier and other inmates on death row. Prejean believes that if people know the truth about executions, they will oppose them. In her essay “Memoirs of a Dead Man Walking”, she openly opposes the death penalty. There are four reasons for her to oppose death penalty is immoral as. Firstly, it is a torture. Secondly,, it does not work out as a deterrent. Thirdly, and it costs more than life imprisonment. Finally, only the poor sentenced to death. She believes that the death penalty is immoral as it is a torture, it does not work out as a deterrent and it costs more than life imprisonment. However, I disagree with her argument, because death penalty is not seeing as a torture in history, Super Court and those criminals deserve the retribution; death penalty help deters crimes and poor cannot be the reason to escape the law.

The United States has set up numerous laws that are said to be for the people 's ' security, however in what manner can those same people make certain that these laws are doing what they are meant for? The death penalty is contended to be a just punishment equivalent to the wrongdoing committed, but is it truly, if it means lowering others to turn into that what they are against. “Always I have concluded the death penalty is wrong because it lowers us all; it is a surrender to the worst that is in us; it uses a power—the official power to kill by execution—that has never elevated a society, never brought back a life, never inspired anything but hate”(Cuomo). Therefore, capital punishment ought to be reformed across all of the United States, not only because it is immoral and prejudiced, but also, because mistrials are a common happenstance, it allows for a violent cycle to continue, and it is truly not an eye for an eye but the easy way out.

To many of us death is a scary thing. We will all die one day, but when someone else takes another person’s life we think of that as wrong in many ways. Killing is wrong. If you take someone else’s life in the United States of America you go to jail. Of course you must be proven guilty of that murder before being charged. It doesn’t matter where you live in almost every state, city and town if you kill someone you are looked down upon and you will suffer the consequences of that action. The question is, if murder is wrong then why is the death penalty okay? Is that setting a good example for society? If you kill someone then we kill you. How much sense does that make if we are

With all of the arguments against the death penalty, you would think that it’s still being implemented due to its effectiveness at inhibiting crime rates. However, this is not the case, as it has been heavily discredited and proved to not discourage crime rates at all (McElwee). According to “Death Penalty Information Center”, since 1990 there has actually been a higher rate of homicide in states with the death penalty than states without, and in 2015 there was a 25% higher rate of homicide in those death penalty states. This proves that in fact, the death penalty is so brutal on society, that when such violence is condoned via the death penalty, more violence is to follow (Brook). In addition, while one belief is that it is cheaper to kill the criminals instead of housing them, the overall costs of proceeding with the death penalty overtake those of its alternative; life imprisonment. Over the full extent of a case, executing prisoners can be up to three times as expensive as life in prison, due to factors like higher costs of capital punishment trials, automatic appeals, the long review process, and heightened security on death row (Brook). There is no need to fund a more expensive and inefficient means of punishment if there is a more humane and cost effective one available in life

This is it. You got off easy for the crime you commited. For that lady you murdered because of your anger issues. Or maybe for that 13 year old girl you raped because she was wearing clothes that showed skin. They will strap you down to a chair one way or another. Depending in which state you live in, they’ll decide in which way to execute you. The executioners will inject you, electrocute you, hang you, or use another one of the methods. Maybe you’ll try to fight it and try to stay alive, but you’ll be asleep soon and that will be the end of it for you. Over the years, the death penalty has been a controversial topic across America. People have different opinions on how they look at it. Some of these approve it, and others

The death penalty is not good for the non deterrence. People will always cover up the death penalty by saying it is stopping people from committing crimes obviously it isn’t. Wouldn't you think that if it really did deter crime people would eventually stop committing the crime. In my opinion if the death penalty isn't going to deter crime then why should we have it. It’s not going to make a difference on whether people kill or not. In Other words if you are a killer

People believe that states that have allowed the death penalty have lower crime and violence rates. That is no true. Over the past years the death penalty has been dropped off in North Carolina, and according to the Department of Justice, the murder rates for North Carolina have dropped increasingly since the state had decided to stop pushing for the death penalty (nccadp.org). People often do a crime when they are under the influence of items like dugs, or alcohol. When people are under drugs or alcohol they do not fear or understand the consequences that will follow once the crime is finished. Therefore the death penalty is not a warning to criminals and the death penalty does not give the people

There are many legal issues that come along with the death penalty. Ratified on December 15, 1791, The United States Bill of Rights states in its eight amendment, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” (8th Amendment to the Constitution). The Supreme Court stated during the 1958 case of Trop v. Dulles, that the 8th amendment "must draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” (Goldberg, 1778). Abiding by this definition, the death penalty is nowhere near decent; therefore it should not be used. This law clearly states that cruel or unusual punishment shall not be used on anybody, so how can death not be looked at as cruel or unusual? What about the agony of waiting on death row just to be put to death? As the Death Penalty Information Center website notes, “Death row inmates in the U.S. typically spend over a decade awaiting execution. Some prisoners have been on death row for well over 20 years” (Death Penalty Information Center). Prisoners who are on death row are generally isolated from other prisoners. They do not get to participate in prison activities or employment programs. They also are restricted on visitation and exercise time, and could spend up to 23 hours a day sitting in their isolated cell. Some people may be able to argue that performing the execution is quick and easy, but the process of getting to that point is not. For some

The death penalty is not a discouragement to violent crime. In other words killing a person for a crime does not decrease the amount of crime going on. In fact some studies of states show that the more executions the more murders. A man by the name of Thorsten Sellin did a study on the number of executions vs. the number of murders in two states between the years of 1989 and 2002. Texas with a number of 239 executions had a higher murder rate than New York with a number of zero executions. There are many studies that show that the murder rate is higher in states with an execution law. There are little to no studies that show the opposite. According to, nodeathpenalty.org, The south where 80%