Today, many criminals are getting away with very little or no punishment for the crimes they are committing. One of these thugs could be walking down the street in your neighborhood hunting for their next victim. These criminals have no remorse concerning what they have done; they are just looking for an opportunity to strike again.
However, if someone asked what your thought is on the death penalty, most would probably say that they are against it that is until a family member or someone you love is walking down the street and that man who was looking for their next victim found them. It was a family member and you will never see them again.
Capital punishment has been a topic of debate for a very long time and it still has
…show more content…
Then a second penalty phase takes place and the prosecution will state the aggravating factors and the defense can show mitigating factors ("Pros and cons of controversial issues," 2009). The jury must unanimously agree to the death penalty and if one objects then the death penalty cannot be given ("Pros and cons of controversial issues," 2009). If the death penalty is handed down, then the defendant has an automatic right to appeal at both the State and Federal levels. This process can take up to 25 years to exhaust.
There are pros and cons to consider in the debate on whether or not to abolish the death penalty:
Death Penalty Fails to Re-establish:
What does it really accomplish? The damage has been done; the victim is already dead and cannot be brought back. Do you feel that making them spend the rest of their life in prison in a small cement cell with little freedom, a poor quality of life, thinking on how they ended up there in the first place is a far better punishment than death row?
The Financial Cost: The financial cost of keeping these criminals on death row is not free nor is it cheap; and we as taxpayers pay for it. The cost for a death row inmate one must consider all the additional cost it entails such as appeals, additional procedures. In March 6, 2005, the Los Angeles Times stated that California death penalty system cost taxpayers $114 million per year beyond the costs of keeping convicts locked up for
The pros for the death penalty are convicting are those with serious crimes such as torture rape and murder. Capital punishment over time has become more humane because it was done by injections instead of methods used in the past. Capital punishment is the only way to stop crimes. It is believed that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. Executing convicted murders, save society money instead of keeping them in jail. The death penalty is a just and proper way of handling convicted murderers. Family’s that have lost a loved one
However it can be argued that prison does not always deter criminals and that having a secure life with enough food, clothing and recreation in prison is not a sufficient punishment for criminals that deserve to die and that citizens should not have to pay to house murderers in prison. They also a some believe that when prisoners get released that the public are not safe from these criminals and could easily repeat the crime again, for example in an article it was said a rapist raped and beat 3 women, and was set to serve up to 25 years in prison, but due to "good behaviour" he gets out in 6 and a half years. Then within 5 months he strikes again, twice, and now he set to serve another 35 years, he needed the death penalty. Although of this unfortunate incident, the majority of people on death row have indeed committed horrible crimes, for the most part rape and murder. They obviously need to pay for these crimes, but I feel like life in prison is a fit punishment. If we as a society support putting people to death, we are essentially stooping to the level of the criminal. Punishing death with death is hypocritical.
The death penalty is a controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years. The death penalty was overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 1970's due to questions concerning its fairness. The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate of executions has increased during the 1990's. There are a number of arguments for and against the death penalty. Many death penalty supporters feel that the death penalty reduces crime because it deters people from committing murder if they know that they will receive the death penalty if they are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it doesn't deter others from committing crimes, it will eliminate
There are many reasons to both support and oppose the death penalty. Many people can feel very strongly about whether or not they approve of this method of punishment. I feel that the death penalty is wrong, and I believe that there is much support to back this up. I believe that the death penalty is wrong because it is not an effective deterrent, racially and economically bias, unreliable, expensive, and morally wrong of society.
Why is the death penalty used as a means of punishment for crime? Is this just a way to solve the nations growing problem of overcrowded prisons, or is justice really being served? Why do some view the taking of a life morally correct? These questions are discussed and debated upon in every state and national legislature throughout the country. Advantages and disadvantages for the death penalty exist, and many members of the United States, and individual State governments, have differing opinions. Yet it seems that the stronger arguments, and evidence such as cost effectiveness, should lead the common citizen to the opposition of Capital Punishment.
Some may think that the death penalty is a good punishment though. Their reasons being that is more humane to put someone to death than to throw them into prison to rot for the rest of their life. Inmates who receive the life without parole punishment will never see the light of day ever again. They will spend their whole life knowing that someone else was able to escape their hell by being given the death penalty. To add on to that while they live their life out, they are stuck thinking about the crimes they have committed for the rest of their existence, no matter how much they regret what they have
The issue of whether or not the death penalty should be used has many different perspectives and opinions. For those who oppose the death penalty,
The death penalty is one of the greatest controversial punishments in the world. There are numerous people who agree with this practice and plenty more who do not agree and believe we should be done with it all together. Some important credential people who give compelling arguments for abolishing the death penalty is Diann Rust-Tierney and Barry Scheck, whereas; the people against abolishing it is Robert Blecker and Kent Scheidegger.
The Fact sheet found on the Death Penalty Information Center showed that solely in Kansas, there was an average of $400,000 per case for defense costs by inmates placed on death row compared to the average of $100,000 paid per case to defense attorneys when there was no death penalty (DPIC). Alarcon and Mitchell conducted a study in 2011 that showed that just in California getting through the process of having an inmate on death row was over $4,000,000,000 (DPIC). This was due to the various amounts of fees that had to be paid for court trials, appeals, housing death row inmates in preparation for their incarcerations etc. (DPIC) lastly just in the state of Texas, the cost of carrying out a death penalty case, which is $2.3 million is three times as much as housing an inmate in solitary confinement at a maximum-security prison for 4 decades (DPIC). This huge difference in numbers add to how unrighteous it would be to keep the death penalty legal in the U.S.
Some people think that the death penalty is a bad thing and others think that it serves the people right but I don’t really know which side to believe because there are good facts protecting both sides. The Death Penalty is a controversial issue.
I, as well as many others, have total confidence in the death penalty. It is a very beneficial component of our justice system. The death penalty saves lives. It saves lives because it stops those who murder from ever murdering again. It also deters potential murderers from ever committing the crime.
The Death Penalty Discussion In today’s world terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many people believe that these criminals deserve one fate; death. Death penalty is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill another human being and is a very controversial method of punishment. Capital punishment is a legal infliction of death penalty and since ancient times it has bee used to punish a large variety of offences.
Lastly, prior to a person being put to death, many of them stay on death row for over ten years fighting the automatic appeal they are given with the courts to overturn their conviction. The additional cost of confining an inmate to death row in the State of California, as compared to the maximum security prisons where those sentenced to life without the possibility of parole ordinarily serve their sentences, is $90,000 per year per inmate. “Currently with California’s current death row population of 670 that accounts for $63.3 million annually.”
Imagine yourself being put on death row. You’d know that you’re going to die, so you walk around taking your last steps, saying your final goodbyes to your family and friends, and eating your last meal. Being on death row is much easier said than done. Imagine how to families of the convicts feel when knowing that their loved one is soon to be killed under a lethal injection. Death row is a very unhumane way to deal with a serious crime. For these reasons, I am against the death penalty.
New Jersey, for example, laid off more than 500 police officers in 1991. At the same time, it was implementing a death penalty which would cost an estimated $16 million per year, more than enough to hire the same number of officers at a salary of $30,000 per year. 3. In Texas, the early release of prisoners has meant that inmates are serving only 20 percent of their sentences and re-arrests are common. On the other hand, Texas spent an estimated $183.2 million in just six years on the death penalty.