The Death Penalty Should Be An Option

Many of those who argue against the morality of the death penalty tend to be backed by Christian beliefs. However, the Bible argues that justice needs to be fair and to the point. “Show no pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot” (The Holy Bible, Deuteronomy 19:21). This quote argues that is it fair to take life from someone if they have taken someone else’s life, and that justice should be viewed as ‘getting even’. With all things considered, this way of thinking seems completely justified, Another argument of those who are concerned about the morality of the death penalty is that lethal injections are inhumane. In reality, death by lethal injection is one of the most fair and most humane ways to die. “Lethal injections work by first rendering the individual unconscious, and then by using the chemical potassium chloride to stop the victim’s heart” (Lethal Injection). Complaints about the amount of pain inmates suffer after undergoing lethal injection and unreasonable and unjustified. Death by lethal injection seems like a much more peaceful way to go than almost any other option out there, which makes it an absolutely ethical process. Even though some people may argue that the death penalty is an immoral process, the truth of the matter is that it is actually quite

Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment is unnecessary and inappropriate in our modern

The death penalty is something many people face each day . There is approximately 1,188 people that were executed in the U.S from 1977 through 2009 . There are many ways on how to execute someone, but primarily we use the lethal injection. The way people are trailed and put on the death penalty, is because of the involvement with first degree of murder, or other crimes. Proponents say that the death penalty is an important tool for preserving law and order. They also argue a term “an eye for an eye” which means that it helps the families grieving, and ensure that they don’t release back to the public for future tragedy. The people against the death penalty say that it is wrong to take a human life, and has no effect on crime. Many of the death row inmates prefer death over life in prison. They say that many death row inmates have been volunteering for their executions. Over 75 inmates have volunteered for their death sentence. This is called a state-assisted suicide. Many inmates said that they would rather gamble on being executed than having life parole. Many inmates say that they spend over a decade awaiting execution. Some prisoners have been in death row for 20 years. They usually are isolated from other prisoners and spend as much as 23 hours alone in their cells. The two punishments they receive other than the death penalty is the living conditions they live in prison. They are usually in a state where they would be executed and,

As far back as one can look into human civilization, justice for a murder victim has always been by taking the life of the killer. In today’s society capital punishment is needed to defend it from further harm, bring justice and/or vengeance to the victims of the loved ones, and encourage psychological deterrence. As of today, there are thirty-two states which offer the only just punishment for a crime without parallel and eighteen states having abolished the death penalty.

The death penalty till this day remains to be a very controversial topic. Some people may argue that it should be considered a form of cruel and unusual punishment; others may rebuttal in saying that the death penalty is capital punishment. When visiting the idea of placing someone to death one must bear in mind the possibility of condemning an innocent person through such torture, the brutalizing effect on society it may leave, and the serious psychological trauma that a defendants family and friends may face. Is this really what the justice system is willing to place on the line in order to gain a form of so called justice. I mean reasonably speaking what will anyone gain from such an action. It definitely will not bring the harm to be undone. As stated in the encyclopedia under the theory of judicial torture “ the use of torture was confined to capital crimes, for which the death penalty or mutilation could apply” (PIHLAJAM, 2004). Looking at how the death penalty is conducted people should not be treated like animals, given a due time to be put down. No human being deserves such treatment whether or not his or her offense was so horrific and traumatic. Is that not the lesson being taught to society when the criminal is captured? Yet, the law as a jury of peers, men just like the accused, may cast the same sin upon him. Why should this action be considered in any way to be fair or believed to be capital punishment?

As Ghandi once said, “You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty”. Canada is a society based around democracy; if the government grants themselves the absolute power to end a person’s life with a single sentence, there are bound to be negative repercussions. It is human nature to makes mistakes, but it is a virtue to learn from them. Instead of resulting to the death penalty as a punishment for committing a serious crime, society should have faith in that person’s ability to change, improve, and be rehabilitated. Moreover, the death penalty is an ineffective way to punish criminals when it comes to serious crimes. If anything, it is an escape for those who have no remorse for their actions. There is no reason to end the life of a human being, no matter how malevolent they are, as it does not benefit society in any way, shape, or form. One could argue that the offender would no longer be able to harm others, but that same result could come from a prison sentence. Furthermore, the rights outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, are fundamental human rights that are not subject to a select group of people, but all of humanity. Capital punishment, no matter the reason, is essentially still murder, as the life of another human is being taken. Limitations must be set in order to separate humanity from the criminals it harbors. Society

Even though it may be the simple way out, the death penalty is very cruel and inhumane. Back hundreds of years ago, the constitution states that everyone has a basic right to live and a freedom of speech. Whereas

The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting which occurred on December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut is an atrocity that rattled the entire nation. 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children and six adult staff members with a gun that he obtained because his mother did not lock it up properly. Adam Lanza, without a doubt, is/was a sick and evil human being that preyed on young, helpless children. Their school was a gun free zone and those teachers and young students were defenseless. No other person in the school was armed besides Adam Lanza (CNN.com). Another awful and tragic mass shooting occurred on July 20, 2012, injuring 70 and killing 12 people. The murderer, James Eagan Holmes, had many options to

The death penalty is also widely opposed by people across America because it is argued to be immoral, a form of torture, economically biased, susceptible to error and does not act as a deterrent. In contrast to the opponent’s view, supporters believe that religiously the death penalty is wrong because the Bible says “Thou shalt not kill”. (sixth commandment) It is also argued that if killing is wrong, then the government should not use it as a form of punishment (Death Row on Trial 2001: video) “how can we kill people who kill people to show its wrong” (Death Row on Trial 2001: video) Also when a person is sentenced to death, they are told how they will be killed and when, until finally they are taken to be executed, which could be years after receiving the original sentence. (Washington Post 2008: e.data) This period in which the convicted person must wait is considered to be a form of torture, (Washington Post 2008: e.data; Death Row on Trial 2001: video) especially when in some cases the person will often see or even hear being tested the chair in which they will be executed. (Death Row on Trial 2001: video) Another major

The death penalty is a cruel and inhuman death, “no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. Death penalty violates the right to life. (2004)

Numerous who are not for the death penalty may recommend that death penalty is "merciless and bizarre" and along these lines is not protected, but rather this contention is practically good for nothing when we consider that we are not a general public that draws and quarters lawbreakers or torments them before at long last slaughtering them. Most expresses that do support the demonstration of the death penalty have deadly infusion; a for all intents and purposes easy discipline, along these lines making it much more moral than different structures honed somewhere else. Beside this, the individuals who might utilize the "coldblooded and uncommon" contention are not considering the unlimited measure of torment brought on to the families and companions

    The death penalty is the most severe sentence that can be administered to a criminal (Capital Punishment 1). There are only fourteen states in the United States that prohibit capital punishment, Iowa being among them (Death Penalty 1).

Don 't get me started on the death penalty. I for one am against capital punishment, I think it is barbaric and cruel however I can understand why some may agree with the death penalty. Punishment by death. The sentence that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence. The death penalty was first introduced in the eighteenth century B.C. Under the code of the death penalty twenty-five crimes were punishable by death.

In society today, many believe executing a human being for committing an immoral act is the most appropriate type of punishment that should be given to a convicted criminal. The name of this capital punishment is mostly referred to as, The Death Penalty, and it can be presented in different ways. This consists of being vitally shot at by a firing squad, poisoned in a gas chamber, given a lethal injection, and so on. Today in the United States, there are thirty one states that approve of the death penalty, while nineteen states believe it is unethical and have completely abolished it from its state (Robert Costa). This amazing data reveals to our society that no one believes a convicted criminal should be forgiven after committing a barbarous crime, especially if that criminal had or attempted to murder an innocent civilian. In addition, at least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent(Pilkington). According to the first major study, there was an attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment. This can be usually seen as an unfair judgement for the accused criminal, but by this time it would have been too late. In the novel, In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, civilians views and beliefs about the death penalty have changed because of the novel.

Punishment is inevitable in a world that judges one’s every move. Common decisions turn into tendencies and tendencies turn into life choices that construed a life forever. For centuries people have faced execution for crimes which were considered to be horrendous. A system that has remained in our judicial system since the first execution in 1606 (deathpenalty.org). As of 2015 execution is only recognized as a form of correction in 31 states throughout the U.S. To ensure justice crimes are punished in a form or fashion equal to the severity of the crime committed. According to the US Federal Government list there are 41 capital offenses punishable by death. Included in this list are crimes such as first-degree murder, treason, and genocide.