The Debate Between Nature Vs Nurture

Scientists often use twins to conduct their experiments. They separated many twins at birth and placed them into two totally different environments. One was given to a very poor family and the other one was given to a rich family. The twin that lived with the poor family did not get much attention when he was growing up and he grew up to be a distant

The twin study allows scientists to research in a unique way. Scientists are often able to identify what makes each twin different from the other when twins are being raised in different environments. The parents who raise the twin may have different views on religion, sexual orientation, and other life choices. By growing up in different homes, the twins may not necessarily have the same views as one another. Normally, the twins are quite similar and have the same goals and choices as one another. This leads to the belief of the nature

"Twins have a special claim upon our attention; it is, that their history affords means of distinguishing between the effects of tendencies received at birth, and those that were imposed by the special circumstances of their after lives." says Sir Francis Galton, 19th century behavioral genetics pioneer. Researchers have used twin studies to try to figure out the genetic backgrounds of an abundance of traits, from determination to intelligence to bizarre to alcohol dependence.

Nature or Nurture. Nature may be all of the genes and hereditary factors with which influence them to become who they are such as physical appearances and personality characteristics. Nurturing impacts people’s lives as well as how they are raised and all the environmental factors. In combination, these qualities can be the true identity of oneself. Many people may argue that nurture appears to a play huge factor in the two, but others may think otherwise. Not having both as a characteristic can have a negative effect on a person physically and mentally. The debate of nature versus nurture appears to be the oldest argument known to man, and it still remains to be unanswered. In the old-age argument nature versus nurture, nature may play a huge role in determining a person’s true identity.

Twin studies are a mainstay of the nature verse nurture debate because they allow researchers to conduct “natural experiments” on human beings. When researchers try to determine the relative importance of genetics and environment with regard to a certain condition, they have a hard time because they cannot generally get people with the same genes. This is where twin studies come in. Twins studies are part of the method used in behaviour genetics, which includes all data that are genetically informative. E.g. siblings, adoptees, pedigree data etc. Researchers use this method to estimate the heritability of traits and to quantify the effect of a person 's shared environment (family) and unique environment (the individual events that shape a life) on a trait.

Currently a study like it would not be allowed today because many people would disagree to use identical twins for a study because it might affect them. It is going to be hard for the researcher’s to explain to people right now about a study like it. Instead it will be better for the twins to be adopted by the same family or have them be placed in similar environments so they will not feel different from each

Twin studies have been a large part of the growing debate on whether genetics or environment (nature v. nature) is responsible for the cognitive, socio-cultural and biological development. In order to properly assess twin studies it is important to know why and how they are relevant in psychology. Identical twins are especially effective in research particularly in the field of developmental psychology and behavioral genetics due to the monozygotic genes which means they originate from a single zygote (fertilized egg) which essentially means they share 100% of the same genes. Due to this exact copy of genes between twins means this can be efficiently be used in order to observe the impact of

According to a telegraph article, twin studies tells us that genes play a far more vital role in shaping who we are. Researchers from Edinburgh University studied more than 800 sets of identical and nonidentical twins to learn whether genetics, or environment plays a bigger role. Twins almost always share the same environment as each other, but only identical twins share the same genes. The study comprised a series of questions, asking the participants how they viewed themselves, “Writing in the journal of personality, the researchers found that identical twins were twice as likely as nonidentical twins to share the same personality traits, suggesting that their DNA was having the greatest impact. Professor Timothy Bates, who had led the study had this to

One twin might get cancer while the other is not susceptible, for example. Many identical twins clearly behave differently as they grow older, and some even grow to look less alike. Such differences don't have anything to do with the twins' identical DNA, which is like the software of life, but in how genes express themselves. The differences stem from chemical modifications in the genes over the years. These effects are the result of chemical exposure, dietary habits, and other environmental factors, scientists believe. Other studies have shown that the brains of identical twins look different upon close inspection of the wiring.

It is the popular saying that identical twins share much more than superficial physical characteristics that seems obvious and glaring both in nature and traits. Formed from a single egg that divides at an early point in gestation, identical twins have what may be the most intimate of all possible human relationships. They often are attracted to the way of life like same careers, enjoy the same style and type of music and same sports, like or dislike the same foods, pursue the same interests academically and recreationally, and find themselves aroused by similar emotional stimuli.

The significance of nature and nurture has been a prolonged debate that has caused quite a controversy and the discoveries made on this topic have made harder to determine which side is the most crucial. Multiple experiments and research studies have been conducted to prove one is better or stronger than the other and they continue to be conducted. As a species, human beings inherited DNA from our ancestors, but what impacts our actions the most is our environment. The predetermined genes are impactful, but it is what one makes of it that shapes oneself. The path is driven by the human being. The way we carry ourselves out is affected by the choices we make, but the way we have evolved mentally comes from the nurturing of our caretakers.

The basic elements of the nature-nurture controversy, debates the genetic or environmental effects of IQ, personality and behavioral differences in humans. Nature describes an inherited trait, otherwise known as the genes, containing the genetic code for each individual born. These genes contribute the physical characteristics, for example: eye color, skin pigmentation, hair texture, blood type, longevity, etc. Genes impose certain diseases, such as Huntington 's Chorea, Breast Cancer, Down Syndrome, and many more. Nurture describes an influence on the individual by the surrounding environment. This surrounding environment includes: parenting, culture, learned experiences, nutrition, exposure to toxins, pollutants and medications. In summary, scholars have been in debate for years over the issue determining the development of an individual from birth to an adult. Are issue of IQ, personality and behavior, inborn or are they learned? Or is it both? The nature-nurture controversy continues still today (McLeod, S. A. (2007).

The debate between nature verse nurture theories focus on whither a person’s development is dependent upon ones genetic blueprint or the

The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature

It has been noted that neither nature nor nurture can on their own provide complete explanation. All characteristics are product of nature and nurture.