The Debate Over Time To Reduce The Budget Deficit

A fiscal deficit is when a government's total expenditures exceed the tax revenues that it generates. A budget deficit can be cut by either reducing public expenditure or raising taxes. In this essay, I am going to analyse the benefits and costs of increasing tax rates to reduce fiscal deficits instead of cutting government expenditure.

U.S. National Debt The U.S. national debt has reached an alarming proportion. As it steadily increases, it's effect may not be felt now, but it will be in the future. Paul Gregory and Roy ruffin, in their book entitled Economics, linked deficits with inflation in the long run (251). Demand-side inflation of this type fails to increase the GDP, but instead just increases prices.

The growing national deficit is a looming problem in the United States now more than ever. The national debt is constantly increasing and government spending is out of control. If these issues are not solved then they could spell disaster for the nation’s economy when the infamous debt ceiling is finally reached. Currently the national policy on the debt is to continue raising the debt limit until a solution is found that is agreeable between both parties in Congress. The two main issues of over spending and the constant raising of the debts ceiling by Congress can both be resolved by government spending reform, balancing the federal budget and initiating pro-growth policies in order to increase the government’s tax revenue.

Answer: If there is a difference in the spending of government and the in income will lead to the deficits. More over deficits occurs when the amount of government total budget exceeds its total receipt for a fiscal year was said by US senate budget committee. From the US debit clock, largest budget items list are medical, social security, defense/war, income security, net interest on debt, federal pensions. As we can see that the largest budget items every item has its own importance for Medicare the budget is $949 billions, social security is $872 billions, defense is $591 billion, income security is $310 billions, net interest on debt is $245 billion, and federal pensions is $253 billion. A cut back in the spending of the government is not an easy task because which lead to so many issues. Every items has got his own importance consider defense which is a national importance, medical which is health importance, likewise every items has got their own importance. I would recommend cut back on income security in which the budget is allotted to maintain forester care, earned income credit, unemployment compensation, nutrition assistance, family support, making work pay this is meant for the citizens of the social welfare.

The United States economy currently faces several problems affecting people throughout the country. These problems are ultimately affecting the growth of the United States. The growth of federal debt and deficit is seen as a major problem by the people of the United States especially when many people do not see the next president doing much more to improve it. The unbalanced labor market and immigration’s possible role in that has also been a discussion for many American citizens. It is important to also address the inequality regarding income. The deep-rooted trend of the rich getting richer and everyone else declining or remaining the same has created a lot of anger throughout the country. Lastly, the housing market has a huge affect on the economy considering housing is the biggest asset and one of the biggest drivers of wealth. Federal debt and deficit, immigration and the labor market, income inequality, and housing have all had negative effects on the United States economy today, while also affecting each other.

Since the nation’s very beginning, it has carried a debt from the American Revolution. Only once in the entire U.S. history has been the debt zero, during President Andrew Jackson’s administration in the 1830’s. President Jackson set a budget like the other future and past presidents, but actually stayed within its parameters. However, the debt kept growing after his presidency and reached $18 trillion dollars today. The world has changed a lot since the 1830’s, the methods used during that period can no longer be the solution in 2015 because there are just too many factors that must be considered. The size and the population of the country have changed dramatically, foreign relationships are far more complicated and broader, and people’s expectations of the government are different.

On the Sixth Avenue in Manhattan, there is a national debt clock that shows the amount of United States national debt. The clock was first installed in 1989, and can show up to ten trillion dollars. It ran out of digits in October 2008 when the sum of debt exceeded the amount. A new clock with two extra digits is going to be installed (Izzo 2 ).

Fixing the national debt is a coservercal issue within our government. Since the two parties have opposing views on how to fix it, it creates gridlock on the process of creating a plan to reduce it. (Perdue, 2015) Our federal government debt has extensively tripled since the year 2000 (see appendix A) (Historical Debt Outstanding Annual 2000-2015,2015), today our debt is a tad bit over nineteen billion. (U.S.NationalDebtClock.org , 2016) We have arrived at his point through the imbalance between revenues and spending, fueled by ever-high interest rates. Which will approximately result with us reaching ninety percent of GDP. (Greife, 2010) The government has no revenue. Therefore, the money it receives comes from the people and the

A good solution would be to enact an amendment to the U.S. Constitution requiring a balanced budget, but all previous attempts have failed. So what does the U.S. have to show for $19T worth of debt besides crumbling federal highways and bridges in danger of collapsing? Not much other than the world’s finest military and a lot of money spent keeping the elderly population happy, alive and healthy.

The underlying truth of deficit spending is the same whether it is used in finance, economics or government that the more is spent, the less income is made (Buzzle, 2014). Many economists argue that deficit spending will hinder economic growth while others disagree. Deficit spending has been the topic of debate for a very long time. Deficit spending is “when government's expenditures exceed its revenues, causing or deepening a deficit. This excess spending needs to be financed through borrowing, likely from foreign governments. The increased government spending can help stimulate the economy as more money flows in, but the jump in borrowing can have an adverse effect of raising interest rates” (Investopedia, 2013). In simpler terms, deficit spending is when a governing body of a nation needs to borrow money from other nations due to the nation being in a recession. Governments borrowed against future revenues so that they are able to finance domestic welfare spending before the twentieth

First, lower tax rate will lower revenues. Overall tax cuts for a new coming year will bring the different amounts of revenue for the previous year if the tax rate falls

So they decreased their deficit by $10,000 which sounds great for one year, but they actually still increased their debt by another $15,000. The same thing works for the government. The government has the Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”), which is basically how much money all the new goods and services are worth that everyone in America buys within a given year. The GDP represents the “how much we earn” part. The second part is everything the government spends money on; healthcare, defense, education, welfare, social security, etc. According to President Obama’s State of the Union Address, we are making progress with our debt elimination. He cited that the deficit has dropped from 6.8% of the GDP in 2012 to 3.9% in 2013. Based on my example above, we know that the deficit is not the same as the debt and that the debt continues to get larger every minute of every day. Unfortunately, while the deficit percentage of the GDP did get smaller last year, the debt percentage of the GDP is ridiculously high at 73% according to the Congressional Budget Office (“CBO”); this means that the debt is higher now than any time since after World War II. And while it may reduce for the next few years due to economic growth, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (“CRFB”) predicts that the debt will grow to 79.2% of GDP by 2024 and 100% by 2023. This means that

This is Red Team’s joint paper on balancing the budget of the government of the United States of America. Red Team’s (from here on we/our) position regarding balancing the budget and reducing the federal deficit varies slightly. In many ways some team members believe that the federal budget is much like any other budget, with a set amount of money coming in, a set of expenditures that are “mandatory”, and the choice to save any money left over for emergencies, or spend it on those things that aren’t mandatory. Some team members also believe that increasing taxes or cutting spending alone will not effectively reduce the deficit and balance the federal budget. However, the federal budget process is a complex one.

After World War II, the debt continued to rise, but until the 1980s the GNP rose much faster. By 1981, the national debt was $1 trillion, equivalent to 33 percent of the GNP. From 1981to 1988, the national debt began to increase dramatically. Some argue the potential reasons for his rise can be associated to the policies put into effect by the Reagan administration (1980-1988). These policies included a large increase in defense spending, reluctance to cut spending on inflation, and enlarged entitlement programs. In 1988, the national debt was $3 trillion, equal to 53 percent of the GNP. From 1988 to 1993, the national debt’s average annual increase was approximately $400 billion. From 1993 to 2001, the average annual increase was less than $200 billion. Some argue this period of debt reduction can be linked to the policies carried out by the Clinton administration (1992-2000). These policies incorporated several tax increases and a reduction in government spending (Nordhaus).

The United States (US) has a rising national or government debt (Nanto, 2011, p. 4), which in 2010 for example stood at $13.6 trillion (The Heritage Foundation et al., 2010) and in mid-2015 stood at $18.153 trillion (National Priorities Project, 2016). Combined with its future forecast (i.e. at $22.4 trillion by the end of this year of 2016, Chantrill, 2016) the national debt is unsustainable and the US is confronted