The Decision Making Process At York College

Decision-making in the workforce is a process of responsibilities used by upper management to implement, enforce rules, regulations, and maintain a successful environment. Decision-making implemented more effectively by making a plan, thinking it through, accepting more than one opinion and determining what is best. However, decision-making often utilized more effectively by opening doors of opportunities for a suggestion, question, discussion, and feedback. Although, more involvement helps improve understanding, utilize behavior skills and present opportunities for better communication. Everyday life consists of decision-making, the right decision may not always be applied, but ensure room for improvement and opportunity. Individuals approached decision-making in many different ways. As stated by (Jones, Graham, & Bateman, 2006) decision making is a procedure used to recognize a problem, weigh the alternatives and evaluate a solution in which, certain situations will require different approaches to become effective.

Looking at the requirements of Grandfield College, I have planned a solution with following steps are Step 1. Data Gathering: This task consists of the gathering of spreadsheets currently used by the software management team which includes the list of software, licensing of software, and all faculty and staff computers and what software is installed on each. Also included is a list of software requests.

Decision making is defined as "the cognitive process leading to the selection of a course of action among alternatives" (Decision Making, 2006, para. 1). Decisions are made continually throughout our day.

The claim that I chose from College Board declares that for a state resident to attend a public college, it is $9,650 for an academic year. This claim is the average of colleges nationwide, so I decided compare the national mean against Pennsylvania states colleges. This claim was discovered on collegedata.com, when I was searching for information to settle a disagreement over the cost of resident tuition for an academic year. This is a practical/timely claim because my peers and I are about to begin our college careers. The results of this hypothesis test may influence one of my classmates’ decisions on college location because I intend to compare Pennsylvania resident tuition against the national average. I predict that Pennsylvania will

Once nominated, the firm compiled a dossier for the candidate. The first page included the candidate’s picture followed by, “notes on counseling sessions, staff performance evaluations, partners’ evaluations, statistical analyses of the quartile rankings for the candidate in each of the evaluation categories, and comparative rankings…” Partners that worked intimately with the candidates were invited to submit a long from evaluation, while partners who had limited contact submitted a short form evaluation. Rarely, partners who submitted evaluations were interviewed to establish a basis for the comments. The next step was for the admissions committee to meet for three days to discuss their initial consideration for the candidate. The committee member that visited the candidate’s office would summarize their visit. In the summary, they would highlight the strength of office support for the candidate as well as their perceived strengths and weaknesses. The partners would then vote in favor of, against or to put the candidate on hold. An important aspect to note about the voting process was that no votes are given a greater weight than yes or hold votes. The committee recommended candidates after the three-day

The college search process is overwhelming. With over 4,000 degree granting institutions, it can feel like there are too many choices. Even with the multiple services offered, like the College Board and AKCIS search tools, students can feel lost among the maze of loose leaflets, posters, and pamphlets sent by assorted colleges bragging about a program or

Personally, I noticed that Carol Andrews had a great start with going through the definition phase of the SDLC process that defines system needs, identifies potential vendors, and collects enough information for further evaluation (Brown at al., 2012). Specifically, she started with thorough feasibility that assessed economical, technical, and operational (Brown at al., 2012). Next, she prepared requirements, such as accurate specifications about the system input and output, and performance requirements. Everything was detailed. She created a list of packages and established evaluation criteria. Once the RFP was written, it was distributed to various vendors. When description of software and packages was submitted back by the vendors, the committee used the point system to evaluate the vendors by functional capabilities, technical requirements, costs, amount and quality of

reviews the application and send this to one of its reviewer group for evaluation which evaluates

Evaluating the decision will involve evaluating the implementation of our chosen alternative by collecting and analyzing information on how well the decision is working.

The product Ish onCourse offers student management software solutions to Australian colleges. The suggested platform provides a wide variety of services. The main purpose is to assist colleges in day-to-day activity associated with the enrollment process. It includes CRM functionality with integrated marketing tools, data collection and reporting solution. Additionally, Ish provides their customers with the website development option and hosting services.

Organizations were under enormous pressure because of the continued recession of 2010 and because higher education is still felling the impact of technology (Picciano, 2012). After all, higher educational institutions also depended on political and economic systems within the country, and leadership in universities needed to cope with the problems of retention and graduation rates that demanded higher educational institutions find creative solutions to these problems. It is informed decision-making that helped university management to generate innovative solutions to student retention problems. Picciano (2012) concluded that informed decision-making entered into a new era when big data offered new opportunities to expand options that helped

The next step in the committee’s process is reviewing the proposals from outside vendors. During this process, the committee develops evaluation criteria, grading scales for evaluating vendor responses to RFP and RFI. The committee then views vendor demonstrations, checks references, and visits sites running the same or similar IS. After the evaluations, the committee prepares vendor analysis’ describing the results from each vendor, whether the vendor’s ideas are aligned with the organization’s goals, and comparing the data. This information is then used to conduct a cost benefit analysis using the previously developed grading criteria to rank each vendor. The committee determines the costs of the capital required, and the total cost of ownership including implementation and support costs. Finally, the committee creates a summary report with a list of the recommendations and a ranking of vendors

All the techniques assisted in following the decision making steps including measuring the impact which is easily forgotten. It is very important to ensure our decision was effective and if it was not. Understanding why the decision was not effective and re evaluating the alternatives and the issues that come into play will help us identify what was missed or overlooked so the problem can get fixed. This also helps ensure the same mistakes are minimized, if not identified so the same issues do not reoccur and something can be learned for the future.

Decision making can be described as a process of making a decision or decisions, based on choices made amongst two or more competing course of actions. The ‘Decision making’ also requires making a define choice between two or more alternatives course of actions that are available.

The input will enable CS team to make a list of the pros and cons of viable execution options. They have to project the impact of the decision to the company’s revenues and bottom-line. Even minor options should be considered in case they have potentials to go big and affect other areas of business.