The Definition Of Uk Copyright Law

 Copyright law is designed to protect literary and artistic works was well as innovation such

Content: A Copyright is legal protection granted to original works, however it does not cover an idea in and of itself, it only covers the expression of it in a fixed or physical form. The author has the exclusive right to reproduce or sell the work, distribute copies, display the work publicly, perform the work publicly, or prepare “derivative works”. Each use of that work can be assigned or licensed; any transfer may be terminated

In the article "When Stealing Isn't Stealing" the author explains that an individual’s original work should be lawfully protected.

That being said, the law offers a way to prevent infringement: public domain. This is material that loses protection from copyright law. When something

     The Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), as stated above, was introduced in response to the growing need to protect individual’s creative works or other subject matter from commercial or other exploitation. It contains provisions, which describes what subject matter is protected, and rights of

A copyright is a right granted to an author, composer, photographer, or artist to exclusively publish and sell an artistic or literary work for the life of the author plus 70 years. The requirement for something to be copyrighted is originality; copyrighted materials include books, magazines, newspapers, computer software, graphic art, architectural designs, motion pictures, and sound recordings. The fair use doctrine allows copyrighted material to be reproduced without permission only if the use of the material is reasonable and not harmful to the rights of the copyright owner. The duplication of copyrighted materials for profit is not fair use because it adversely affects the potential market for the copyrighted work and steals profits from the creator.

The final years of the nineteenth century saw a move from this formulation of copyright to a broader one. The later definition of copyright included not only the protected work in its published form, but also in its substance, therefore magnifying the control afforded to the copyright holder. Copyright laws were extended to include photographs in 1884, and musical recordings in 1971 (Fisher 2). Since their American inception, copyrights have grown too with regards to the window of protection afforded the author. Instead of the original fourteen years, copyrights today now endure longer than the author of the works they protect. A copyright issued now lasts for the life of the author, and then another fifty years (Fisher 2).

Copyright is a federally protected part of intellectual property that automatically regulates creative works of authors. Copyright laws began approximately around the 15th century in Europe. The cause for such regulations stems from infringement of creative works. These works fall into one of three main categories; music, visual works, and literary works. Copyright infringement highlights the need for copyright laws over creative works in music, art and writing, resulting in an ever changing copyright landscape. Title 17 of the United States Code outlines what does not fall into any of these three categories, and therefore cannot be protected under copyright. It is also important to note that not every use of a creative work

“Copyright Law protects authors rather than inventors. An author creates works of a literary, dramatic, musical, graphic, choreographic, audio, or visual nature – ranging from printed material to photographs to records and motion pictures, these works receive automatic federal protection under the Copyright Act of 1976 from the moment the author creates them,” (Corley, Moorehead,, Reed, & Shedd, 2004).

protected by copyright. Copyright is the right owned by the creative artist to utilize or

Bainbridge (2006), Gerdsen (2003), and Dinwoodie & Cornish (2008) all support the notion that intellectual property is complex and vast through the combination of many rights. Intellectual property describes how a creative person’s creative work is protected. It allows the creator to control the use, and management of their creative product once it is within the market (Gerdsen, 2003). Touse (2006) acknowledges that copyright “gives the right to authors … to exclude others from copying their work without permission, thus creating the intellectual property rights for literacy and artistic works” (p. 8-9).

A recurrent theme evident throughout copyright literature is the comparison between ‘fair dealing’ and ‘fair use. These provisions allow for additional rights to be awarded to users for educational or research purposes. Their meaning and scope are defined by different legal systems, thus are not synonymous terms. ‘Fair dealing’ is a legal term pertaining to common law jurisdictions. It is used to establish whether the use of a copyright material is lawful or whether it infringes copyright. With research or private study as a central requirement, a two-part test must be carried out with the purpose, the character, the amount, the alternatives, the nature, and the effects of the dealing taken into consideration. The introduction of the ‘fair use’ model, with ‘different elements’ to the US doctrine, is highlighted by the ‘Modernising Copyright’ Report 2013. With recent worldwide trends moving to a ‘fair use’ doctrine, there are many advocates promoting the method, considering it a highly flexible way of enabling use of copyright works without infringement. Universities Australia, in its submission to the ALRC discussion paper, believed the replacement of ‘fair dealing’ exceptions with ‘fair use’ would enable academics to use copyright material in more advantageous ways currently afforded to the US. Fair & Tidmarsh also reach favourable conclusions, noting that it would allow copyright works to be used in a way “consistent with the greater public interest of facilitating

It was 17th century philosopher John Locke who popularized the idea that the ideal government’s principle duty was to protect the material property of its citizens, but perhaps just as important to the health of a nation, is the protection of the citizen’s intellectual property. Without the protection of intellectual property innovators and artists would have no rights to their creations, therefore no incentive to create new works. To protect these men and women, lawmakers drafted some of the most important pieces of legislation in our nation’s history: copyright law. Copyright law guarantees that the rights to a creative work are held by the creator. This means that works that fall under copyright cannot be sold or reproduced without the creator’s consent. This gives creators the security that their assets will not be stolen, and thus, creates and environment that encourages new innovation, and fosters artistic expression. However, copyright law today is deeply flawed, often achieving the opposite of its original goals. Today, both individuals and large corporations use copyright law as a tool to stifle competition, and remove works that they object to. From this, we have been left with a copyright system that fails to protect people from false copyright takedown claims on the internet, that has copyright terms that are much too long to be reasonably justified, and that does not guarantee the rights that are promised under fair use. To solve these shortcomings, it is

was 17th century philosopher John Locke who popularized the idea that the ideal government’s principle obligation was to protect the material property of its citizens, but perhaps just as important to the health of a nation, is the protection of the citizen’s intellectual property. Without the protection of intellectual property innovators and artists would have no rights to their creations, therefore no incentive to continue working on creating. To protect these men and women, lawmakers drafted some of the most important pieces of legislation in our nation’s history: copyright law. Copyright law guarantees that the rights to somebody’s works are held by the creator. This means that works that fall under copyright cannot be used, sold, or reproduced without the creator’s consent. This gives creators the security that their assets will not be stolen, and thus, creates and environment that encourages new innovation, and fosters artistic expression. However, copyright law today is deeply flawed, often achieving the opposite of its original purpose. Today, both individuals and large corporations use copyright law as a tool to stifle competition, and remove works that they may not like. They are able to do this through manipulation of politicians and holes in the law. From this, we have been left with a copyright system that fails to protect people from false copyright takedown claims, that has copyright terms that are much too long to be reasonably justified, and does not

A copyright gives the owner of a creative work the right to keep others from unauthorized reproducing that work. There are certain criteria for a creative work to meet the copyright law. There are three different type of criteria and the work must meet all of them to be protected.