The Democratic Party And The Republican Party

In order to avoid losing voters to third parties, the two major parties are often forced to adopt positions championed by third parties. To fully comprehend why third parties exist, it is important to first be able to identify the numerous challenges they face in order to gain any sense of credibility.

For centuries, two main political parties, the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party, have divided the United States government. The Democrats are considered the liberal political party and can trace its roots all the way back to Thomas Jefferson when they were known as Jefferson’s Republicans and they strongly opposed the Federalist Party and their nationalist views. Republicans are considered the conservative political party and try to uphold more traditional values. The Republican Party came into existence just prior to the Civil War due to their long-time stance in favor of the abolition of slavery. In 1860, they became an established political party when their nominee Abraham Lincoln was elected as President of the United States. Since their inception, the Republican and Democratic Party have had many disputes about policies. One of these major debates has focused on educational funding in the United States. The parties have different views on the education system of the country, but both agree there needs a change in some way. Democrats favor more progressive approaches to education, such as implementing the Common Core System, while Republicans tend to favor more conservative changes such as longer hours and more focused programs to better educational resources. In Virginia, Republicans from 1990 to 2013 worked to provide better educational funding more prominently than Democrats.

Third parties have been prevalent in nearly every United States election since the Anti-Masonic Party was formed in 1828—and have carried a foul reputation with them ever since. Traditionally, third parties are seen as voids into which voters cast their ballots, taking away those precious votes from the party that they most represent ideologically. However, this cynical view of third parties—and voting for people who are not running at all—overlooks the fact that, in voting for these parties, there is a certain degree of freedom afforded to the American people, a freedom not only to vote for whomever one wishes but also one to exercise the right of inadvertently and peacefully protesting the main presidential nominees offered up by the main

The Third Party System was a Democratic Party that was not able to maintain the alliance that was formed with the southern and western farmers once slavery became the main problem in America. The Third Party was created after a sectional dispute that was about slavery that led to the collapse of the Second Party System back in the 1850s. The Third Party divided into two with the Democrats in the South being proslavery and the Democrats in the North being antislavery. In 1860 the party selected two different presidents that represented each of the two divisions and they also found themselves having disagreements on slavery. After the death of Webster and Clay, there was a lack of leadership that was having a big impact. The Republicans, on the

This is undeniable due to the fact that for a third party to have a chance at winning an election, they would have to disproportionately sway enough States to win, which in itself is an extremely difficult task for an alternative party. Nonetheless, this would almost certainly result in an election won by a very small margin. The marginal division that arises from a three party system could cause the least favorable party to win by a split vote because of the other two parties. This would thereby create national division that would prevent progress from being made, serving as an issue for the electoral system. In fact, history has shown that third parties can botch an election. An example of this is the 1912 Presidential election, where Theodore Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party split the republican vote by gaining 27% of the vote and allowed Woodrow Wilson of the Democratic Party to win. This election was not the only one of its kind. A similar event took place in the 2000 election between Al Gore and George Bush where Ralph Nader of the Green Party was believed to take a significant amount of votes away from Al Gore, causing his loss. However, these events do not happen frequently because the Electoral College system encourages third party movements to eventually join the two major political parties. If an outer party were to join with a major party, they would have more success getting what they want, but they would have to compromise some of their stances to accommodate the major party. This system inhibits political unions to occur within the government and forces them to transpire within political parties. Therefore, although some contest otherwise, the two party system is more convenient and sufficient than other party systems because it allows for continuity and stability in the government. The Electoral College, subsequently, is necessary

In a political atmosphere where it is easy to be grouped up in either conservative or liberal, it is harder to see such an easy split more and more each day. Non-traditional candidates are now emerging into the political arena that in prior elections would have been scoffed at. Whether we are talking about the unusually high polling Libertarian candidate, Gary Johnson, the Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders or the Authoritarian Republican Nominee, Donald Trump, It is getting harder and harder to ignore the rise they are having. The two major political parties will have to adapt to these emerging ideologies or face the threat of the dreaded “third party”.

From my studies in Political Science it is not hard to understand that the United States political system is dominated by two political parties; the Republican Party, and the Democratic party. This is known as a two-party system, the definition of a two party name is evident from the name. A two party system functions on two parties, much like United States politics this is confusing because more than two parties are allowed to compete in elections. In America, any party outside of Democrats or Republicans is referred to a “Third Party”. My research paper will focus around one of the third parties, The Libertarian party. This paper will set up necessary knowledge through an exploration of the ideals of the party, and where

America is vastly known as a country boundlessly pursuing equality in all facets of life. In this seemingly endless quest for equal opportunity, there has been one lurking negation; our election system. The addition to equal representation in public funding and on the ballot will create variability and allow Americans to entrust their vote in a political format that more closely aligns with democratic philosophy. Therefore, a shift away from a bipartisan, a two party, dominated election system would not only be a healthy change for American electoral satisfaction, but for the future of third party politics. Unfortunately affluence and inherent wealth have played a large role in this divide between a true democratic election and our present biased, broken, and benyne system.

Abramson, Aldrich, Paolino and Rohde wrote about the third party along with third party candidates such as Wallace, Anderson and Perot. However, no third party candidate has come close to winning the presidency. This has to do with the electoral rules creating barriers for these candidates to not win. The authors looked at George C. Wallace (third party candidate in 1968), John B Anderson (third party candidate in 1980) and H. Ross Perot (third party candidate in 1992). The authors looked at a survey research data on the individual-level behavior. Towards the end, the authors discussed the presidential elections of France in a comparison with the United States. From 1832 to 1992, thirteen third-party candidates received either

The third party that arises during the presidential party is to obtain votes that could have gone to the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates (Ginsbert et al, 2013). That third party can be used as a distraction between the two main candidates,

College students from other democracies are often surprised (dumbfounded) that there are currently only two effective political parties --the Republicans and the Democrats. How would you explain that to them? Offer and explain at least THREE reasons why 3rd parties rarely succeed in America politics

The two-party system is an enduring part of U.S. politics. Even before the ratification of the Constitution in 1789 the founders themselves were split into two separate camps. Since then American politics have gone through different parties, but there were never more than two major political parties. There is trouble in paradise though. Modern discontent with “Washington insiders” have led many to consider seeking those unaffiliated with one of the major parties. While the two-party system has endured thanks in part due to a coalition makeup, electoral accountability, and organizational strength there is a strong desire for an alternative for the current parties with barriers in place inhibiting the emergence of a third party.

It’s that time again, in occurrence every three years when candidates from different political parties begin preparing campaigns for next presidency. Modern politics consist of two major parties, the Republican and Democratic Party. Candidates from these two parties usually present and debate on hard pressing issues within the country while running for President during. Among the two major parties that exist there’s also third parties; those are the Constitution, Green and Libertarian party. If the Republican or Democratic Party were non-existent then the Constitution Party would serve as an outstanding major party.

Although the U.S. has two major political parties, there are other third parties that exist. These third parties contribute to the electoral process despite the fact that they receive less attention. Third parties bring attention to certain issues that may otherwise be ignored by the media and other candidates, which might then lead to government action for that particular issue. Another way third parties contribute is that they are able to provide a voice for people who do not fall under the two main political ideologies and parties. For example, the Libertarians may not have a real chance of winning, but they allow voters to feel that there are politicians who agree with them and that their opinions are left

With this recent shift, as well as a multitude of changes and surprises within America’s political arena, the basis of our democracy has come under question. At the very foundation of American politics is the Two Party System. For almost as long as this system has existed, there have also existed the outliers, the Third Parties. They sprout up, scattered throughout American history, each a representation of the multitude of conflicting and complex political outlooks of the United States throughout history and through different perspectives. Despite their many attempts, none of these seeds have ever taken root or been legitimized. This isn’t without fault. Third party political parties have been barred from participating in American politics. Today and throughout history, systematic steps have been taken to prevent Third Party political parties in having any place in the election process. At the beginning of a political season, many third parties receive strong support, they find their candidate and campaign, then, finally, it comes time for voting. By this time, hope seems to dwindle and supports seem to vanish. Success for any third party candidate is rare