The Deposition Of Plaintiff, Susan White, And The Attorneys Representing American Airlines And Sunoco

Erin Brokovich was presented with a check for $2 million for all her efforts, and continues to work on cases involving peoples who have been victimized by large corporations.

The parties in this lawsuit are: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (plaintiff) and Mims Distributing Company, Inc (defendant), the EEOC is the plaintiff on behalf of Christopher Alston (Lally, 2015). Christopher Alston was a potential employee of the Mims Distributing Company, Inc.

In the case of Fare v. Michael C., the police arrested the sixteen-year-old Michael C. under the suspicion of murder, and he was transported to the police station for a custodial interrogation (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). Furthermore, before the interrogation began Michael C. was advised of his Miranda Rights, and Michael C. specifically asked to consult his probation officer, and not a lawyer (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). Consequently, the police refused to allow Michael C. to speak with his state probation officer, and they continued to question him about the murder (Henry-Mays, 2007). Michael C. continued to answer the investigator’s questions and he drew sketches, which ultimately implicated him in the murder (Henry-Mays, 2007). Now that we understand the general facts of the case, let us examine the key facts and issues, which lead to the Supreme Court’s decision.

The movie a Civil Action covers the Woburn Case which was Anne Anderson and other small families who decided to sue the companies Beatrice Foods and W.R. Grace. The reason for Anderson and the other families to decide to sue was because they believe the companies dumping of poisonous chemicals was the reason to their children’s leukemia deaths. However, when they reached out to Jan Schlichtmann to handle their case he was not the most positive on wanting to help them, “Ms. Anderson, our firm is very small, three attorneys that's it, which means we can only take on so many cases at once and we have to be very careful on the ones we do take because we can't afford to lose, our clients pay nothing, we pay everything, and the only we get paid back

On Wednesday, December 16, 2015, at approximately 2:15 p.m., I, Investigator Torres, traveled to meet with Human Resources Manager, Ms. Sylvia Yu at The Hat Restaurant located at 2300 South Atlantic Boulevard, Monterey Park, CA 91754. She refused to provide a recorded statement and refused to sign a confidential waiver in regards to providing a statement of this claim involving Claimant Diana Guzman.

Danny Cunningham agreed to meet with the nursing home on Friday and provide them with as much of the documentation he could gather. Mr. Cunningham’s only concern about leaving Mrs. Cunningham in the nursing home was losing the home. Worker explained to Mr. Danny Cunningham the home would not be placed up for sale as long as his father was alive and living in the home. Worker also instructed him to speak with Ms. Morrow about the home selling after his father pass away because of his sister living in the home. Because she has lived in the home for 30 plus years, she may be able to remain in the home after their parents passing. Mr. Danny Cunningham stated that would not be an option because upon their passing, the home would be sold and Ms. Robin Cunningham could find herself another place to live. Mr. Danny Cunningham stated his sister was not able to care for his mother but was able to care for Mr. Cunningham because he did not require assistance. Mr. Danny Cunningham stated the family was hoping Mr. and Mrs. Cunningham could remain in the home with hospice care until their passing because that was what they wanted. However, his mother’s level of care is to intense now and she could live several more

The State is presenting Kelli McDonald against the defendant to testify to her lab report. Similar to Dodd and Melendez-Diaz, the defendant in this case has the right to cross-examine Kelli McDonald regarding her capacity as a chemist on his case and her present capacity capacity in order to display the possibility of impropriety. Since Kelli McDonalds’s lab report and testimony belong to the core testimonial class of evidence, her testimony directly relates to the defendant’s defense because there is a break in the chain of custody when the Sheriff’s department’s exerted control over the evidence could display the possibility of

Worker met with Mr. and Mrs. Tidwell at the home of Mr. Walker. Worker discussed the importance of both Mr. and Mrs. Walker receiving 27/7 care. Again,

In the case of Black v. Usher Transport, 2011 U.S. Dist. 32775 (S.D. Ohio), the text states that Mr. Black was a former truck driver for Usher Transport, who was contacted by a prospective employer of Mr. Black (Walsh, 2013). Usher Transport informed the prospective employers that Mr. Black had failed a drug test, and that he had been arrested, in which the office worker later retracted stating, that both the arrest and drug test were a mistake and that here was not official proof of the arrest (Walsh, 2013). Mr. Black felt that he had a reasonable cause to file for defamation against Usher Transport for falsely reporting information that was incorrect. Black could contend that Usher Transport does not have the proper documentation of Black's alleged arrest and implies that Usher Transport falsely indicated that Black was arrested.

The Christophers were hired by an undisclosed 3rd party to take pictures of the Du Pont facility. Workers notice an airplane circling above the plant and an investigation is launched immediately. It is determined that the Christophers are the ones in the plane and contact is made between both plaintiff and defendant. The Christophers are asked to disclose the name of the person or corporation by Du Pont and refuse.

Depositions help attorneys gather information, while also preserving a witness’s testimony. By conducting depositions, an attorney is less likely to be surprised at trial. As an attorney for Great Northern Bank, I will be deposing Albert Waltham. Albert Waltham is a key witness in this case, and his testimony may help us advance our argument. When deposing Albert Waltham, I will target three areas of inquiry: his meetings with Jake Garner, documents he may have received regarding David Waltham’s loan, and whether he had any interest in David Waltham’s car loan.

On this date worker received a call from Ms. Debra Dawkins, nurse at Amedisys home health, for the purpose of monitoring Ms. Brown's apartment application. She questioned worker about Ms. Brown's Oakman apartment applications. Worker informed Ms. Dawkins that she was not participating in placing Ms. Brown into an apartment. Ms. Shelly and she had talked about the arrangement and Shelly stated she would talk things over with the doctor and have Amedisiys SW to assist with the process, only if the Ms. Brown was capable of caring for herself.

Patient George Matthew was taken to the accident and emergency department and later admitted to the Acute Stroke Unit with issues caused by right sided weakness and slurred speech. When being admitted into hospital, his two daughters and his wife accompanied him. He is 75 years old and currently lives with his

A geriatric-focused social history with a geriatric review of symptoms could prove to be an efficient way to assess those aspects of Mr. Brown’s life. In addition to his testimony, one would also look to get the testimony of Mrs. Brown and any other caretakers, along with using the conversation and clinical visit to observe and assess Mr. Brown’s physical state, mental capacities, and emotional state. Given the problems Mr. Brown is experiencing due to his “massive stroke”, it would seem appropriate to do an Instrumental and Basic ADL assessment. Given his mild cognitive impairment, it could also be appropriate to perform one of the standard mental assessments (MMSE, MOCA, SLUMS, etc.) with a preference for the type that is normally used for

In 1994, Six African American employees of Texaco filled for a racial discrimination lawsuit against Texaco. Tapings of Texaco executives having conversations about destroying evidence related to a discrimination lawsuit against Texaco and racist terms to against black employees become public; and, Texaco was facing a crisis (Coolidge, 1996).