The Development Ofu.s Copyright Law

There are claims made suggesting that copyright is a direct violation of our freedom of speech. Within the general foundation of protection and enjoyment of those protections, rest limitations, because of the real connection between authorization and copyright law. The goal of research is to investigate and unearth specific facts about the history of intellectual property in relation to old and contemporary court cases. The M. Whitmark & Sons v. Pastime Amusement Decree states that copyright is an indivisible and cannot be split up and partially assigned, as to time, place, rights and privileges (298 F. 470, 1924). Does this case contradict the Digital Millennium Act? Are the copyright rules in violation of any rights concerning our right to free speech? If so, how are those rights violated? The Statute of Anne in eighteenth century Europe, was set up to prevent the unauthorized composition of works that had

Copyright is any expression recorded in any physical form, published or unpublished in any medium whether it is music, books, artworks or newspaper articles. Federal publications, facts and ideas are not copyrighted (www.honolulu.hawaii.edu). The very first copyright law that was established was known as the Statute of Anne, which was authorized in England in 1710 (history of copyright, 2005). The newly founded constitution allowed secure rights to its creators. An act very similar to the Statute of Anne was passed by congress in 1790 as the first American copyright law (history of copyright, 2005). As more and more books were produced and were becoming more accessible domestically and internationally in Europe and North America, it became

Copyright laws must be flexible in addressing and supplementing the needs of Australia’s modern society. However, the failure of the existing, and outdated Copyright Act 1968 (Cwth) in fulfilling the needs of the Australian public has triggered the need for copyright reform. Copyright reform aims to reconsider the relationship between copyright, innovation, technology, research, and economic growth, where it would provide flexible laws fundamental to the broad dissemination of knowledge. Copyright laws should strike a balance between the interests of the creator and the Australian public in terms of access to knowledge, culture and education. Copyright reform aims to

Feb. 1831 the Copyright Act was the first revision to the United States copyright law. The additions to the act included the following; extended the copyright term from 14 to 28 years, added musical compositions to list of protected works, extended the statute of limitations, and changed the copyright formality requirements.[3]

We respectfully submit this brief amicus curiae in support of the petitioners, Eldred et al. The petitioners owned the copyrights of works now in the public domain. They challenged the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA) on the grounds that the act allows copyrights to exist in perpetuity and restricts free speech, so the act violates the Copyright Clause and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Justice Ginsburg denied Eldred’s challenges, finding that the terms established by the CTEA are limited terms and that the act accommodates for petitioner’s First Amendment concerns. We submit this amicus curiae in dissent of the court opinion that upheld the CTEA.

There was a Copyright Act passed in Congress in 1976 aiming at breaking the traditional association of publishers with all works while little recognition is given to the authors. Section 101 has also been amended to allow owners with exclusive rights to reproduce, prepare derivatives from copyrighted work, distribute, perform; display and audialy transmit copyrighted works (School). The authors, publishers and database companies have since tried to settle original copyright infringement by compensating those with registered works of copyright and those whose works had not been registered. There is a contradiction, especially for the second group. Thus, the Supreme Court declined to approve this

It is important that the United States created these copyright laws in order to protect the rights of artists and their work. If these laws were not in place, then the work of these artists could be stolen and they would not make a profit off of their work.

     The Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), as stated above, was introduced in response to the growing need to protect individual’s creative works or other subject matter from commercial or other exploitation. It contains provisions, which describes what subject matter is protected, and rights of

Copyright protections are guaranteed by the United States Constitution under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 and are under federal jurisdiction through the U.S. Copyright Office. Established from the British Statute of Anne which transitioned protective rights for books from private agencies over to the government and expanded them to the public. As stated in the Constitution, the

Without laws to protect an individual’s work, slowly but surely, all work would become pirated and unoriginal. The term “piracy” can be traced back to the 14th century, when back then it had a different meaning than what the meaning is today. During the 14th century, piracy meant the practice of attacking and robbing ships, nowadays, however, piracy is defined as the unauthorized use

The US copyright law basically developed from statutory and English Common Law. Hence, types of work and copyright protection are slightly similar to the UK copyright law. The copyright law of the United States also provides copyright protection in “literary work”, “dramatic work” and “musical work”. In section 102 (a)(2) stated that protection of the US copyright law cover “musical work, including any accompanying words,” as same as section 102(a)(7) which protect the copyright of sound recording.

The copyright law in America originated in the fifteenth century after England introduced the use of the printing press. Due to the growth in the number of printing presses, the authorities began to seek the control of the publication of

Those of us who care about continuing the copyright tradition that regards public access to information as the principal goal of the law are faced with the hard task of searching for and exploring middle-ground scenarios wherein author/publisher interests in receiving compensation can be balanced with user/library interests in having access to information on fair and reasonable terms. Finding and implementing such a balance is all the more challenging in view of the messianic fervor that the Green Paper has engendered in the publishing industry. As we search for middle grounds, it may help to realize new technologies have been disrupting existing equilibria for centuries, yet balanced solutions have been found before. The printing press disrupted the equilibrium of its day. When the first legal regulation of printing proved imbalanced, legislative adjustments achieved a public policy balance that has lasted for a considerable period of time. While the history of copyright reveals many examples of disruptions caused by new technology and the construction of new balanced equilibria, one relatively recent instructive example is that of the cable television industry. When cable technology made it possible to transmit television programming to cable subscribers, owners of programming copyrights sought to stop this retransmission, saying it would be their ruination. Courts, however, found no copyright infringement, saying that passive retransmissions of signals were not “public

Fast-forwarding to 1909, U.S Congress enacted the Copyright Act of 1909 and even further to 1976; U.S Congress amended the act of 1909 and named it the Copyright Act of 1976. Under Title 17 of the United States code Copyright Law exist and thanks to both the acts of 1909 and 1976 Section 1 provides us with this following paraphrased information:

India has one of the oldest academic traditions with formal education finding a place in its ancient history. The universities of Takshila and Nalandaare great centers of learning in the early world, teaming with students and teachers from all parts of the world, not to say about the great Gurukul tradition in the age-old past. However, those are the days when learning was considered as gift of God, freely received and freely given. Over the centuries, the learning approach gradually changed. Old traditions paved way for new ones. New economic models and institutional structures emerged. Concept of copyright in literary works found a place inIndia by the nineteenth century.