The Devil Wears Prada Obedience Analysis

Obedience to people in authority is a deep-rooted trait that we all possess by virtue of our upbringing, and as Milgram put it, “it is only the person dwelling in isolation who is not forced to respond, with defiance or submission, to the commands of others” (Milgram 1974). This trait is exhibited every day in family circles, workplace and school. People are most likely to obey instructions from people they perceive their authority to be legal or moral. We see people obeying their pastors, leaders in various societies and other people they see as higher to them; and they obey anything they are being told even if it involves killing another human being. They justify their actions, however wrong, on obedience to authority.

“The Perils of Obedience” was written by Stanley Milgram in 1974. In the essay he describes his experiments on obedience to authority. I feel as though this is a great psychology essay and will be used in psychology 101 classes for generations to come. The essay describes how people are willing to do almost anything that they are told no matter how immoral the action is or how much pain it may cause.

Individuals often yield to conformity when they are forced to discard their individual freedom in order to benefit the larger group. Despite the fact that it is important to obey the authority, obeying the authority can sometimes be hazardous especially when morals and autonomous thought are suppressed to an extent that the other person is harmed. Obedience usually involves doing what a rule or a person tells you to but negative consequences can result from displaying obedience to authority for example; the people who obeyed the orders of Adolph Hitler ended up killing innocent people during the Holocaust. In the same way, Stanley Milgram noted in his article ‘Perils of Obedience’ of how individuals obeyed authority and

The purpose of Stanley Milgram writing his “The Perils of Obedience,” is to show to what extent an individual would contradict his/her moral convictions because of the orders of an authority figure (Milgram 78). He constructed an experiment wherein an experimenter instructs a naïve subject to inflict a series of shocks of increasing voltage on a protesting actor. Contrary to Milgram’s expectations, about sixty percent of the subjects administered the highest voltage shock. (Milgram 80). According to Milgram, experiment variations disproved the theory that the subjects were sadists. (Milgram 85). Milgram states that although the subjects are against their actions, they desire to please the experimenter, and they often

All participants gave shocks of up to 300v with 65% reaching the highest level of 450v. From this experiment it was concluded that obedience in individuals is more likely to occur in unfamiliar environments where there is an authoritative figure present and if someone else was responsible, there is more chance of

Conformity and obedience are some of the factors that usually influence the various processes that determine the manner in which an individual behaves in a social set up. They also have an impact on how people follow and adhere to social norms (both written and unwritten) as well as fashions and their immoral actions (Milgram, 2010). Several aspects come to play when one is asked by another individual to do a particular thing. First, they will need to consider whether whatever they are being asked to do is morally right or wrong. Second, based on the circumstances, they can either obey or comply and better still, they can decline to do it. The term obedience refers to the act of an individual doing something that they have been asked to do. On the other hand, conformity regards to how others influence people. They do things that they were not requested to do. The influence is usually through the behaviors and thoughts of others. This paper will compare and contrast the factors involved in conformity and obedience.

In society, obedience to authority is ingrained in humanity from an early age, causing some individuals to blindly obey orders without contemplating the credibility of the source. In psychoanalyst Erich Fromm’s article “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem,” he explains that throughout human history obedience has been associated with virtue and disobedience with sin (Fromm 127). Fromm suggests that our conscience is an internalized voice of authority (126). Fromm claims individuals need to distinguish the difference between rational and irrational authority because obedience is effective when individuals want to obey, instead of fearing to disobey (127). Two other authors who examine obedience are Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee

Social influence plays a big part in how a person acts in a situation. A person’s behaviour that has been influenced can be shown in 2 ways: Conformity, which is when a person changes their attitudes and behaviours to fit in, and obedience to authority, which is when a person obeys orders from someone who has a higher status than them. This essay will look at and analyze examples of conformity, non-conformity, and obedience to authority in the movie Cool Hand Luke. Cool Hand Luke It looks at the everyday lives of prisoners, and how they cope with the many trials around them. The main character, Luke, has to make difficult decisions which involve him conforming to a certain standard, or obeying

Thesis: For the ability to join this 30% of those lucky people, I would fulfill my dream job of working in fashion public relations.

There are many dangers of authority and obedience, some people in authority don’t always have the best intentions and don’t always do the right thing. People under authority

The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform, also with explanations of minority influence. Whilst seeking to understand the reasons why people obey authority, it will show an evaluation of Milgram’s study of obedience, discussing the ethical issues raised from the research and

Business Studies Film Review Maris Stella School By: Kenda Lang Released: June 30th 2006 Directed by: David Frankel Adaption of: The Devil Wears Prada the novel Lauren Weisberger: Story line and novelist Screenplay: Aline Brosh McKenna Genre: Drama/Romantic film Film Duration: 1hour 50minutes Lead Actors: Anne Hathaway Meryl Streep Emily Blunt Stanley Tucci

The Devil wears Prada is about a fresh-faced, honest young girl called Andrea (Andy) Sachs, who has just graduated from university, and who dreams of becoming a journalist. She accepts a job with a well-known fashion magazine, as an assistant to make ends meet and get some experience, (“a job that a million girls would kill for”) under a tyrant of an editor called Miranda Priestly.

The movie The Devil Wears Prada demonstrates the burden that employees bear in balancing work and life in an organizational environment that seeks to regulate and control their identity across all platforms.

The fashion centric, The Devil Wears Prada showcases a journalism major from Northwestern University enter an entire new world of clothes, make-up, bags, shoes and accessories. My primary purpose of getting hitched to this film at the very beginning was its title. I guess it’s prominent that the word “fashion” reaches a woman’s ear faster than the speed of lightning striking the sky and Prada being the most popular brand drew me closer to it.