The Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders

1865 Words8 Pages
Mental illnesses and their symptoms are intricate experiences that have the ability to be conceived and measured both categorically and dimensionally. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) relies substantially on a categorical application, but requires review of the dimensional temperament of mental disorders. Eating Disorders (ED) have become an abode for implications for meeting criteria of diagnosis. Categorical classifications and details are habitually functional yet have significant confines that need to be acknowledged. Dimensional assessments endorse a more individualised understanding and review of symptoms and contributing factors. Both perspectives should be seen as corresponding, and may beneficially…show more content…
Kraemer (2007) determined a disorder was a clinically relevant implication and diagnosis was establishing a disorder is existent in patient. The use of dimensional and categorical perspectives is to enforce the quality of diagnosis rather than the disposition of the disorder. Adding a dimensional aspect to the DSM-V categorical diagnoses rather than to trying to replace it required considerations of symptom factors including the amount, duration, severity, degree of impairment and the final diagnosis. There were illustrated advantages of dimensional over categorical diagnoses in a trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy as implicit for the treatment of eating disorders (Vartanian, Polivy & Herman, 2004). If a dimensional measure of frequency of binges and purges are used for cases of Bulimia Nervosa, a statistically significant effect would have been observed, demonstrating that the diagnostic treatment is more effective in low-risk than that of high-risk groups. If this were categorical, CBT would be seen as ineffective as a treatment. A statistical perspective portrays the advantages of using dimensional over categorical results provide greater overview to perceive greater treatment effects, accuracy in estimates within a cohort, and better ability to detect symptoms in determining a diagnosis. Inconsistencies and theoretical weaknesses are inherent in the current DSM since most ED patients are largely atypical. In the
Open Document