Generalissimo Francisco Franco came into power after his victory in the Civil war in 1939 and ruled over Spain till his death in 1975. In this 40-year period Spain was massive changed that causes much debate as to the political nature of Franco’s regime whether it is fascist or something different, Francoism. To understand if Franco’s regime was fascist, fascism must first be defined. There are many working definitions of a fascist regime, Stanley Payne’s states that the dictator must alien his regime to the idea of anti-isms, them being aintiliberalism, antidemocratic, anticonservatism, anticommunism and antidemocratic. Payne states these are fundamental in the description of a fascist regime. Another useful definition is Robert Griffin, stating that a fascist regime will use symbolism, violence to pursue its political aims, with the importance aimed at expansionism. Finally Griffin also states the need of the dictator to implement an authoritarian and totalitarian government. All these help to create a fascist regime and more importantly a truly fascist dictator. There is little doubt Franco holds to some of these definitions yet in later year the idea of Francosim becomes more viable however to understand if Franco was a truly fascist dictator we must look to the similarities and differences and determine by examining Franco’s rise politically his general style of government and finally his foreign policies it will determined whether Franco was a truly fascist dictator.
Fascism, before its rise to power in 1922, was an amorphous collection of often contradictory influences, ideologies, and backgrounds. World War I provided ties between the hyper-masculine and hyper-violent ideals of the movement. The growth of Fascism was slow immediately after the war, but that time was when many of the institutions of Fascism were founded. After 1919 through 1922 Fascism grew even more, but contradictions remained. R.J.B Bosworth argues in his book, Mussolini’s Italy: Life Under the Fascist Dictatorship, 1915-1945, that the early period of fascism was defined by earlier movements, the glorification of war, nebulous ideologies, slow growth, and contradictions.
The Totalitarian Aspects of Nazi Germany The government of Nazi Germany was a fascist, totalitarian state. They ruled in Germany ever since Hitler became chancellor in 1933, to 1945. Totalitarianism was a form of government in which the state involves itself in all facts of society, including the daily life of its citizens. It penetrates and controls all aspects of public and private life, through the state's use of propaganda, terror and technology.
Benito Mussolini outlines several essential characteristics of his preferred political ideology, Fascism, in what has become known as the Doctrine of Fascism. In this paper, Mussolini outlines his vision of the ideology, and explains the major issues that Fascism will address once it becomes the leading political system in Italy. Mussolini’s major points as outlined in the Doctrine included an extreme emphasis on nationalism, organization and modernization of the state, persistent focus on religion, life as a struggle, and the notion that individuals exist only for the improvement of society as a whole. Wolfgang Schieder, after reviewing the Doctrine of Fascism, explains Mussolini’s success based on it and
Hitler as a Totalitarian Dictator Before I begin to answer the question, "to what extent was Hitler a totalitarian dictator", I must first expand on the meanings of these two widely used political terms. In the "Reader's Digest Great Encyclopaedic Dictionary", the definition of totalitarian dictator is as follows: "Totalitarian (adjective). Of, pertaining to, régime which permits no rival loyalties or parties and arrogates to itself all rights including those normally belonging to individuals. "
Elizabeth Wiskemann contends that Italian fascism was not influential outside of Italy and that its significance to the Franco regime was marginal. She is unequivocally clear that the Francoist ideology that guided political developments in Spain for decades is fundamentally different from classical fascist ideology.1 In addition, Wiskemann is very forthright in suggesting that Italian fascism was a minor actor towards shaping political affairs in Spain by stating that any evidence to the contrary is regarded by historians as being ‘flimsy’.2 This particular book is useful not only because it provides an interesting perspective on how fascism has developed, but also because the text itself is very approachable and succinct. However, there are
. Fascism and Communism are two different forms of government that were very similar. Fascism is a 20th century form of nationalistic, militaristic, totalitarian dictatorship that seeks to create a feasible society through strict regimentation of national and individual lives. Communism is type of government in which there is no private property and the government controls the entire economy. Communism tries to satisfy the basic needs of society by sharing work and benefits. Both theories were dictatorships that at first were loved by the people and soon later hated by them.
Examples included how “blacks and whites were not allowed to live together, and children of mixed marriages were not considered legimitate. Colonial administrators created separate facilities for Italians and Africans, including separate buses, restaurants, and movie theatres. Italians could not serve Africans in shops.” It would not be because of this racist system that would lead to Britain using Nyasaland KAR forces, but to reclaim their former territories. For the Nyasaland forces however, their desire was to save their homelands from the tyranny of fascism.
Francisco Franco was a general and authoritarian leader, who governed Spain from 1939 to 1975. He came to power shortly after the start of the Spanish Civil War. In that war, he led the rebel Nationalist Army to victory over the Loyalist forces. After the war ended in 1939, Franco held complete control of Spain. His regime was similar to a Fascist dictatorship. He carried out the functions of chief of state, prime minister, commander in chief, and leader of the Falange, the only permitted political party. He adopted the title of El Caudillo, the leader. In the early years of his regime, he tried to eliminate all opposition.
No, I do not think that the United States could become a fascist nation. I say this because this country would never allow it; in order for a nation to become fascist it requires certain conditions that America would never comply with. Fascist nations are often dominated by the control of men, and there are too many women’s rights activists in the U.S. to allow such a thing. Also, a fascist nation severely limits educational, art, and press expression. Americans have a heavy belief on high educational standards as well as the freedom of expression in the arts, and it is unconstitutional to constrict the voicing of the press. Fascist governments are led by a dictator, and the checks and balance system was put in place to prevent any one section
A candor and vigil man, there is unlike any dictator in history than Francisco Franco. His reign commenced in 1939, and it prolonged until his death in 1975. He had a bewitching characteristic to his leadership: warlike. Military surged through his veins since he was an infant. Born in a naval town of northwestern Spain in 1982, his father came from a paternal lineage of naval officers. He, too, wanted to appertain in this “long, ancestral line.” Unfortunately, the naval academy in his hometown closed when Franco was able to apply. He, instead, enrolled in The Military Academy in Toledo in 1907 (Hicks, par. 3). After twenty years of service, Franco became the chief-of-staff of the Spanish army. Francisco Franco was not a politician. He was a military man. Having a compass that was distinctly militant and an authoritarian boast in his actions made for a long reign of forty-plus years for Franco.
The dictionary defines a tyrant as a cruel or obsessive ruler. Who could be so evil as to act in such a way? One example is Benito Mussolini. Benito Mussolini was an inhumane and heartless ruler of Italy. He abused his power as leader, using terror and intimidation to get what he wanted. He was a dictator with a great ego, which allowed him to be a fascist who massacred nearly a million people.
When the word “fascism” is mentioned people usually associate the word with German Nazis’. There is more to fascism than just German Nazis.’ Fascism is an interesting topic that should be further examined and explained so it is no longer simply associated with German Nazis’. This essay will explain what fascism is (definition), how fascism groups are run, the ideology of fascism, and some past examples of how fascist governments operated.
Francisco Franco would be known as a fascist by modern standards. Fascism is a totalitarian philosophy of government that glorifies the state and nation and assigns to the state control over every aspect of national life. The regular concept that comes out of Fascism is the suppression of religion by outlawing the right of freedom of the practice of religion. Instead of suppressing religion, Spain actually increased the power of the clergy to have policing power. The Law of Political Responsibility in 1939 gave the church powers equal to those as government officials and those officials had to get statements from the priest. This made Spain in the minority of the world powers that were fascist including Germany and Italy. For example, Germany suppressed catholicism by outlawing the practice and imprisoned the priests in Germany and Poland. They also killed many catholics and jews because they wanted them to be the only thing that the citizens believed in. Italy in tern abolished the papal states in favor of putting the Capitol in Rome and they melded religious religious rhetoric and symbolism into their policies. They also made catholicism the state religion, which is typical form of fascism by mainly religious
Fascism is a 20th century form of nationalistic, militaristic, totalitarian dictatorship that seeks to create a feasible society through strict regimentation of national and individual lives. Total subordination to the service of the state and unquestioning loyalty to its leader would adjust conflicting interests. It is a modern political ideology that looks to regenerate the social, economic, and cultural life of a country by basing it on a heightened sense of national belonging of ethnic identity. Fascism rejects liberal ideas of freedom and individual rights, it often presses for the destruction of elections, legislatures and other elements of democracy. Despite fascism’s idealistic goals, attempts to build fascist
There are multiple causes that allow The Fascist party to snake its way up to the top. A national social crisis has a portion in causing fascism to grow powerful. A national economic disaster is another part that causes fascism to develop, even further. A charismatic leader creates a major chunk of causing fascism to rise to the top of the pyramid. A nation that is desperate to get back to normal is something that causes fascism to dominate the people’s minds. Fascism has a multitude of causes, if these causes happen simultaneously, then that is a formula for a fascist party to take over.