The Differences between Logical, Ethical and Dialectical Reasoning

All of the support needed to be convinced by an argument is understood in the proposition without having to be explained. Nevertheless, if several of these true propositions are strung together, it can lead to a more refined but true conclusion. This method is called syllogism.

There are multiple methods of scientific reasoning within philosophy. Each has its own benefits and drawbacks, but they all try to give us a more precise method to conduct scientific research.

As said before, deductive reasoning is known as reaching a conclusion by starting with a general principle and applying it to a specific case, a minor premise. This is seen in Stanton’s stand as she starts with generalizations, “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal…” and “Let facts be submitted to a candid world.” She then proceed to apply this to specific instances such as, “He has compelled her to submit to laws…”, “He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.”

Effective- He uses of logical is effective because when his audience hears a fact or things that are true, they will pay more attentions to the situations.

A deductive argument is an argument that is intended by the user to be valid and to guarantee the truth of the conclusion given that premises are true. An inductive argument is an argument that is intended by the user to be strong or good enough that, if the premises were to be true, then it would be unlikely that the conclusion itself is false. An example of a deductive argument would be; Socrates was a man. All men are mortal. Therefore, Socrates was mortal. An example of an inductive argument would be; Socrates was Greek. Most Greeks ate fish. Socrates at fish.

On the other hand, President Obama relied on both inductive and deductive reasoning types (Evans, 2012). Using inductive reasoning, President Obama was able to identify the key issues such as his purpose in improving alliances with countries across world and justified the ideas into a conclusion.

22.  A ________________ is a fundamental form of reasoning where one proposition is inferred from two others.

Every day we are faced with certain situations that challenge us with how to act in an ethical manner. It can be human nature to feel unsure or conflicted with the correct moral choice. Some can say that one should know how to handle such dilemmas and others may say that there should be a reference of some sort to help guide through such conflicts. Sometimes we know the answers and sometimes we are unsure of how to handle certain situations. Most times we go through life wondering what we should do. As I become further educated on the different theories of ethics, I believe there are answers that are available in guiding one through an ethical dilemma and or judgment. I will discuss Vincent Ruggiero’s three basic criteria, Robert Kegan’s order of consciousness, the three schools of ethics and the correlation between all three.

BonJour begins his second half by elaborating on argumentation itself. An argument is a set of propositions in which one proposition (the conclusion) follows from the other propositions known as premises (BonJour 4). The transfer from the premises to the conclusion is known as an inference (BonJour 4-5). This is an idea that seems basic and all philosophers use arguments in order to justify their claims. An argument therefore underlies the whole philosophical discourse. BonJour commences his second argument by looking at the nature of reasoning

First, deductive reasoning is “a truth-guaranteeing type of reasoning, meaning that if the premises of a deductive argument are correct, then the conclusion must inescapably

Deductive Reasoning — The ability to apply general rules to specific problems to produce answers that make sense.|

Its getting to the truth by exchange of logical arguments. When manipulating this method a person or group of people are swayed to chose a desired outcome. Understanding is the first step to controlling. This formulaic trick moves groups of people. It is how we get many major changes in our society.

Page 9 Syllogism- Proofs, or arguments, used to back up a speaker's ideas that are based on reason and logical appeals are known as syllogisms, which are the formal type of reasoning. An example would be: All cats eat food. All who eat food are eventually hungry. Cats are all eventually hungry.

In computing – programming there is almost always more than one solution to a problem and this is where Logical Reasoning used to. The main use of Logical Reasoning is to anticipate the outcomes of the algorithms that are designed to solve a problem, to help select the best solution. Consequently Logical reasoning is the systematic application of rules to problem solving and task completion. These rules could be mathematical, logical, programming, grammatical, engineering, scientific, story construction in fact anybody of rules based around a logical system.

is truly logical because the major premise is true. In a more 'general world ' however, we refer to logical thinking as simply deducing a reasonable explanation or conclusion from what is already and personally known. What is personally known is often fallacious because of stereotypes,