The Differences between Thick and Thin Types of Surveillance

587 Words2 Pages
The primary difference between thick and thin types of surveillance is that thin surveillance does not "constrain our mobility," whereas thick surveillance does. ("Illustrative Hypotheses for Surveillance," n.d). Thick surveillance "involves confinement to delineated, and often fortified spaces, in which observation is enhanced by a limitation of the range of mobility of those observed," ("Illustrative Hypotheses for Surveillance," (n.d). Thick and thin surveillance is used differently, depending on the context. However, the different uses of surveillance will depend on sociological issues especially socioeconomic class. Generally, thin surveillance will be used more often with "people who are better off economically," and thick surveillance disproportionately impacts the poor, disenfranchised, or underclass ("Illustrative Hypotheses for Surveillance," n.d). The reasoning behind the differential use of thick and thin methods of surveillance is that the people in thin areas are less in need of surveillance, because they are presumed to commit fewer crimes and be less deviant. Wealthier people are believed to have "benevolent intentions," unlike their poorer counterparts ("Illustrative Hypotheses for Surveillance," n.d). People who are disenfranchised are labeled as being at risk for committing crime and thus, a thicker surveillance method is used in those cases (Lett, Hier & Walby, 2010). Furthermore, the persons with "benevolent intentions" might even be offered a reward

More about The Differences between Thick and Thin Types of Surveillance

Open Document