The Doctrine Of Direct Effect And State Liability

1671 Words7 Pages
The Issue relates to the application of the doctrine of direct effect, and possibly the application of indirect effect and state liability if require in pursuant of invoking the EU Transfer of Pensions Directive (TPD) in a UK national court (NC) in light of the UK’s national legislation which evidently fails to completely encompass the directive. Directives are a secondary source of European Union (EU) legislation which in accordance with Art 288 of the EC: are binding on the EU Member States (MSs) to which it is addressed; they outlines objectives that need to be achieved; they is not directly applicable; they instructs the alteration of domestic law so that it complies with EU policy. Implementation rests in the jurisdiction of MSs, nonetheless directives must be established by a specified deadline as a failure to can be a breach, and MSs can be held to account before the European Court of Justice (CJEU).

For Directive (TPD) to be relied upon before UK court Alfredo must show that it is directly effective. The doctrine of Direct Effect was originally established by the CJEU in Van Gend en Loos . When an EU provision is directly effective it confers invokable obligations and rights on individuals. This occurs when the following limited conditions are established: the terms must clear, precise, and unconditional and not be reliant of further legal measures .

It is questionable as to whether or not the TPD is clear and precise, but in accordance with

More about The Doctrine Of Direct Effect And State Liability

Get Access