The Dramatic Effects of War on Countries Essay

The French and Indian war was not really a big hit of a war, out of all the wars that have happened. Although this war was a big event of the American revolution, the Indians and French colonists were not very well prepared for this war. The fact that they were not ready made the Indians and French very upset which made them, want to work harder. Not only did they get upset but as well as George Washington got very well disappointed with in his army.

During the time that the war went on the Natives began to disregard the French. That it gave the British an advantage. Next The French and Indian War the English colonists in North America no longer required help from the British against the French. By the time the war broke out France had gained control of most eastern Canada. The French and Indian War was part of a worldwide contest for empire between Britain, France, Spain and other European nations, known as the Seven Years’ War.

France won the war and made the French people feel like they could be invincible. The English said this about the French, “ In the beginning they passed not a hundred in number they said how the noblemen of the realm of France, knights, and squires, shamed the realm, and that it should be a great wealth to destroy them all: and each of them said it was true,” (doc 2). From the point of view of the English, they thought they were higher than the English and were stronger and would win the war. After 116 years, when the war ended, the French were on top, showing their strength. Joan of Arc was unique because not only was a female that led the French army, but she led it because she said God told her to.

Bao Ninh’s The Sorrow of War is a novel that is a personal view of the Vietnam War from the perspective of a Vietnamese soldier. Like the American novel “The things they carried”, this novel brings about the effects of war on people, and especially how it defeats the human capacity for things such as love and hope. Bao Ninh offers this realistic picture of the Vietnam War’s impact on the individual Vietnamese soldier through use of a series of reminiscences or flashbacks, jumping backwards and forwards in time between the events most salient in memory, events which take on a different theme each time they are examined. His main protagonist Kien, who is basically Bao himself, looks back not just at his ten years at

The French brought over supplies to help the Continental Army. On thing they brought over were siege guns. The guns were an advantage because the British didn’t have them.

During the 17th century, the French and Native allies inflicted monumental defeats against England. At the same time, New France was rapidly expanded into areas of land stretching down South towards Louisiana. As Settlements began to prosper, Great Britain viewed this growth as a threat to their position in North American trade, which was the linchpin to war with New France. Through years of industrious and unwearying battle, The French fought unwaveringly to defend their colony. Unfortunately, they fell short and lost every installment, one by one. This can be attributed to many issues of New France during this time. The battle between France and England was a major catalyst for struggles that preceded and eventually led to the fall of New

By using careful tactics, techniques, and procedures, the American Colonies were able to make good use of their artillery to help combat the superior opposing artillery force. Lord Cornwallis’ artillery crew teams lacked the experience and skill that the American-French artillery forces had used. By using special munitions and creative efforts, they were able to overpower the British and eventually led them into a siege. They were cut off from rations, water, and other outside supplies which rendered them incapable of fighting back. The British troops had resorted to eating rancid meat and dysentery as well as smallpox had begun to spread throughout the ranks. The siege only lasted nine days, which was also the entire period of which the battle was actually fought.

An interesting fact is that both countries, America and France, fought their wars on their homeland. The Americans faced a small amount of British troops established in the colonies already, and they also had the Redcoats crossing and ocean from Great Britain. This gave the Americans an advantage that the French did not have. The Americans were blessed with more time to organize and more time for warning. The French did not have this advantage because they were fighting their own government on their own soil. Another significant part of each war is that the Americans did not have any neighbors whereas the French had to worry about invasion from other countries in their time of weakness. The best advantage the Americans had was the fact that the British Empire was the most hated country of the time. Many countries sent aid to America especially the French. The French paid for a large sum

The English, with a smaller population, actually had a larger pool of higher quality troops available than the French. England also had a lock on longbowmen (yeomen), who were also excellent infantry and light cavalry. Thus the English had mobility and quality advantages. Meanwhile, the

“The Tragedy of war is that it uses man’s best to do man’s worst” wise words from Henry Fosdick. When it comes down to the time where an individual hits rock bottom, a man either do its best or do its worst. Although, Man can do its best and do its worst at the same time. There are many reasons how man’s best can result to man’s worst. Henry Fosdick statement is both true and false.

A few years later, Henry V landed in France with ten thousand men and besieged Harfleur, a port town along the French coast. The siege lasted for a month, and Henry marched into the town, victorious, with very few men, because most of them died from disease. He then set course for Calais, but was stopped by French forces in Agincourt. Henry had only about six thousand men and the French force had twenty thousand. Henry used the woodland to give his forces a better chance. The French, on the other hand, set up three lines with knights in front. The knights were easily taken down by English longbowmen, the second line was slowed down by muddy swampland, and the third line retreated. This was a decisive victory for Henry and his outnumbered army. Henry continued advancing to Calais. Next, Scottish and French armies join forces and raid English holdings in Normandy. The English forces were decimated by the combined forces of France and Scotland. Soon after that battle, The French and Scottish tried once more to remove English control of Normandy, but their forces were easily cut down by longbowmen. Scotland stopped aiding France in the war, and England kept their hold in Normandy. The English started to take control of most of France again, started winning more battles. “The balance of power changed in 1429, with the appearance of Joan of Arc,

It can be hard to fully comprehend the effects the Vietnam War had on not just the veterans, but the nation as a whole. The violent battles and acts of war became all too common during the long years of the conflict. The war warped the soldiers and civilians characters and desensitized their mentalities to the cruelty seen on the battlefield. Bao Ninh and Tim O’Brien, both veterans of the war, narrate their experiences of the war and use the loss of love as a metaphor for the detrimental effects of the years of fighting.

War has influenced economic history profoundly across time and space. Winners of wars have shaped economic institutions and trade patterns. Wars have influenced technological developments. Above all, recurring war has drained wealth, disrupted markets, and depressed economical growth.

The military revolution was a direct outcome of changes in the virtuosity of war between 1560 and 1660. The changes crucially influenced campaigning and combat in Europe during the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The most influential alterations included transformation in weapons, growth in the army size, change in tactics and organization, and centralization of the states’ bureaucracies. There were many battles in the late 17th and early 18th centuries that were highly influenced by the implications of the military revolution, for example, the Battles of Hogue, Danube, and Blenheim. These altercations started a development for military superiority and increased proficiency that enabled Europe to dominate the world long after the Wars of the Spanish Succession. However, I would like to emphasize that those victories mentioned above were heavily influenced by the skills of the commanding individuals and their roles in the military organizational system rather than a full internalization of the revolution’s implications overall. The Duke of Marlborough is a great example of an individual overweighting the flaws of the late 17th century logistical systems to his advantage. By comparison, France’s failure to understand and implement the alterations eventually enabled the rise of Britain’s at the French expense.

The outbreak of the First World War in August 1914 produced immediate changes. It is often said that war is the 'locomotive of history' - that is what drives it along. Certainly the First World War helped to produce major changes in Great Britain especially socially and economically.