The Economic and Political Motives of the American Constitution vs. the Articles of Confederation

Following the United States’ independence from Great Britain, delegates from each collective state set out to establish a body to govern the newly formed nation. From this came the Articles of Confederation, which was officially ratified in 1781. The Articles of Confederation proved to be a landmark in government for those days because it was a model of what a loose confederation could be. However, this soon failed because the official

The government under the Articles of Confederation found itself facing numerous of difficulties. By 1787, most Americans agreed that the Articles of Confederations were flawed and weak and needed at least two major changes. First, most people wanted Congress to have the power to

The Articles of Confederation were a set of principles set forth that got our nation through the Revolutionary war. When the articles fell short at working effectively the state delegates attempted to

The Government of the Articles of Confederation were not a complete failure. They started with the intent of showing a strong united country. With that front, they would be able to conduct trade with other nations. However, while the Articles presented this font and gave it other successful variables, it was ultimately weak. The Articles gave the government very limited power and most power was given to the states. The newly formed country had just been freed from a monarchical rule; they were afraid of another strong national government or ruler that would take away their rights. With this in mind, they purposely made the Articles weak. On the other hand, the government of the Articles of Confederation weren’t a complete failure. It set an

The Articles of Confederation failed because it was created for the wrong reason with weak central government. The reason for creating the Articles of Confederation because of the states jealousy of their own power. They also made the confederation to established a system in which each state can retain almost all of it’s own power to do what it wanted. It had no independent source of power for it’s operations. According to the Keeping the Republic textbook, The Articles were replaced because it didn’t have a strong central government. Without a strong central government they were not able to provide the economic and political stability that the founders wanted. With the confederation they lack power and money. Having an unbalanced power in the government and the state federal

Essentially, I would consider the Articles of Confederation to be quite a great failure; to put it simply, the downfall or rather collapse of this constitution was in all of its weaknesses. Nevertheless, it did have numerous strengths. However, it did serve a purpose when it was drafted during the years of 1776 and 1777; this being during the time when the colonists were fighting for liberty and liberation in the Revolutionary War. The thirteen new states weren't united and so, most people saw this new constitution to be a way to unite the new nation.

under the Articles of Confederation, a document which is now considered to be far too weak to

The Articles of Confederation was created in November of 1777 and ratified in March of 1781. The Articles of Confederations purpose was to determine how the National Government would play in the newly independent United States of America. Due to the Article being formed before the Revolutionary War ended, the colonist only had one main goal with their idea of a new government, anything opposite of the Monarchy. However, this led to four major issues that would later lead to the failure of the U.S. government. The four main issues included Congress inability to raise taxes, the requirement of unison to amend the articles, Congress was unable to increase taxes, the states’ governments had no checks and balances, and the national government had little power towards foreign powers. Consequently, Shay’s rebellion in 1786-1787 brought attention to the underlying problems with the Articles of Confederation. In order to resolve these issue, the U.S. Constitution was formed in 1789.

The Articles of Confederation fall short in many regards and this nation cannot thrive under them. The first reason is that our Congress cannot collect taxes, but instead the state’s tax the citizens and have to turn it over to Congress. However, if the state does not give Congress the

The Articles of Confederation is considered by many as the first written constitutions in America; however, there were many failures found within this prototype constitution and that led to its inevitable replacement. This replacement would become the Constitution that exists in America even today. Despite its weaknesses, the Articles of Confederation is still significant in American history as it set up the groundwork for the Constitution that would later be written and signed in 1787. While there are some similarities in the Articles and the Constitution, both documents were radically different.

Yes, I agree that something had to be done about the Articles of Confederation, but as a new and growing nation, it was likely to experience growing pains. Some power is good for

In the beginning of the United States we used the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of confederation were in no way a perfect answer to America in the beginning, but it was the starting point for the Constitution. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The present United States Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation on March 4, 1789 (Articles, 2013). The problems with the Articles of Confederation came to light during Shays Rebellion. This showed how week the Articles of Confederation actually were. The Rebellion pointed out the fact that Americas inability to

Another weakness involved only having one branch of federal government. The Articles provided no executive branch, meaning no one to enforce the laws, and no judiciary branch, meaning no one to interpret the laws. This provided the states with the opportunity to basically do as they pleased. Even though there was a congress, they had a hard time getting anything done because in order to amend the Articles all 13 states had to unanimously agree, which is very difficult for anyone to do, let alone 13 completely independent states not wanting to change, and providing that each state only received one vote, no matter how big or small the population. The Articles also stated that the federal government could not raise an army. There were many weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation and that is what lead to the “revision” or complete throwing away and instead having the

In my opinion the Articles of Confederation was a messy ordeal that the people threw together. The intention of the Articles were to unite the states in a loose alliance, while each state still had its independence. I think they only adopted this because they were in a pickle, I do not think they thought about the issues that would arise out of this Confederation. They wanted this form of government because each state wanted their own independence and this was the only way to get it while forming a confederation. Although the Articles were a messy time it was important for laying down future ideas and foundations. From the Articles we got the concepts of republicanism ,which in other words mean the people would not be governed by queens or

The Articles of Confederation needed revisions for several reasons. The first reason being that the articles created a weak government. Secondly, there were many weaknesses that were evident and required immediate attention. The weaknesses that were the most important were that the government could not establish a mandatory taxation, did not have control over commerce and the nation lacked overall unity. These weaknesses lead states to reject the original articles because these problems could simply not be overlooked. The need for a stronger government, as well as solutions to the weaknesses presented, led to the constitutional convention in Philadelphia