The Ecstasy Of Influence : A Plagiarism

We, human beings feel distinctly unique, individual and most importantly, unmistakably superior due to our exclusive intelligence. This is why we, as a society, tend to look down on other types of life-forms, insect or animal, as they do not possess that desired intellect. Yet, Lewis Thomas, in his opinion essay “On Societies as Organisms”, argues that human society has much to learn from the communal accomplishment of other life-forms. The author effectively conveys this main idea through his use of analogy, enumeration of examples and through his level of language.

The rarity of human uniqueness no longer exists in the thoughts of scientists believing that human ability skills lie within the construction and use of tools. As declared by Goodall in which chimpanzees used straight sticks after removing the leaves and branches to collect termites or ants for consumption. (Goodall, 1986) Other species both primate and non-primate demonstrate successful abilities., which include a sense of self as well as the theory of mind, by which other species recognize that other individuals contain different information than themselves. Different species also have the ability to communicate symbolically to one another through the sounds of vocalization. (Sapolsky R. M., 2006)

The advanced intelligence of human beings granted people the power to develop and enhance technologies since the Age of Foragers. Human beings were said in the book to be the only species on Earth that could “communicate using symbolic languages” (17). This usage of symbolic languages allowed humans to share and pass on their knowledge with great precision. The offspring, combining what they inherited from their ancestors with their own experience, were likely to further advance technologies. In fact, the symbolic languages also granted human beings with opportunities to talk about ideas that have not yet happened, which could stimulate the appearance of new technologies. In addition, the author claimed that humans’ ability of “collective

This essay is going to discuss the role of intelligence in human beings examining both internal and external factors. Intelligence and whether it is innate or develops as one evolves, is one of humanity’s greatest debates. In everyday life one has to make decisions, solve problems and make sense of the world and what is happening in it. From an external point of view the intelligence of a human being develops through a constructive, cognitive process. Since the 1950s, cognitive developmental researches agree on the now nearly universal consensus that intellectual skills are the by-products of self-governed activity in relation to the world (Bruner, 1990; Gardner, 1985). Considering this, it is difficult to understand that scientists

Intelligent design begins with the observation that intelligent beings produce complex and specified information (CSI). Design theorists hypothesize that if objects are designed, they will contain CSI. They then seek to find CSI. One easily testable form of CSI is irreducible complexity [certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved] (IC). ID researchers can then experimentally reverse-engineer biological structures to see if they are IC. If they find them, they can conclude design (p.1).

A Synthesizing and creative mind as Gardner terms them goes side by side as synthesis takes up information from a variety of sources and interprets them objectively. The result is a well-arranged representation of information as it keeps on mounting. Creativity comes in to evaluate the synthesized information and develop ideas or solutions to break new ground. The concept follows the same variable as Fernandez, which accrues the terms curiosity, insight, and creativity. Curiosity, as mired by Fernandez, is the idea of seeking new experiences bounded by knowledge and moreover acknowledged with the willingness to learn and adapt to change (Fernandez 2014, p. 21). He accords curiosity with insight as one must be able to make sense of the information and the knowledge. The understanding of two results into a creative process that assesses the environment and finds alternatives to the challenges which are a strength for success in the twenty-first century.

This essay is going to discuss the role of intelligence in human beings examining both internal and external factors. Intelligence and whether it is innate or develops as one evolves, is one of humanity’s greatest debates. In everyday life one has to make decisions, solve problems and make sense of the world and what is happening in it. From an external point of view the intelligence of a human being develops through a constructive, cognitive process. Since the 1950s, cognitive developmental researches agree on the now nearly universal consensus that intellectual skills are the by-products of self-governed activity in relation to the world (Bruner, 1990; Gardner, 1985). Considering this, it is difficult to understand that scientists

One possible definition of creativity is ‘imaginative activity fashioned so as to yield an outcome that is of value as well as original’ (NACCCE, 1999, page 31). Traditionally, creativity has been associated with exceptional people or those who are artistically gifted (Education Scotland, 2001). However, in recent years, distinctions have been drawn between ‘big-C’ creativity (an act of genius) and ‘little-c’ creativity (‘everyday creativity’) which enables people to problem-solve and adapt to change in everyday scenarios (Kersting, 2003, Craft, 2014; May, 2007). Nevertheless, Planche (2012) claims that many people do not perceive themselves as creative. The concept of everyday creativity is important, for if this premise is accepted, it may be said that everyone has creative potential (Sternberg, Grigorenko, and Singer, 2004).

From the birth of the first single celled organism, to the first dated appearance of the neanderthal, life has been constantly evolving to achieve a greater sense of survival and adaptation. We as human beings have become a prime example of the evolutionary process surpassing the predators which once preyed upon us to becoming the top of the food change. Although our evolution is an amazing feat we have used the knowledge of billions of years of evolution to create something in which blows our evolutionary process into shambles,that something being technology. As our brains developed to the adapt to our surroundings, we became more intelligent and more creative. This gave leeway to our instincts to create. Since the

Evolution is a process that has taken billions of years, and will continue for billions more.It takes hundreds of generations for an evolutionary change to occur, or an impending extinction to become evident. Humans find it difficult to see themselves evolving due to their longer life span, and fewer generations over time compared to other species. It has become a common misconception that humans are finished evolving, and that they have reached the best and most efficient beings possible. The same misconception can be carried over to art. The main questions being posed in this paper are: can evolution be viewed as a creative process like the art world? Can there be anything new in both art and

Nature presents suggestion to the humans in many ways. One way of such inspiration is the best way in which ordinary organisms behave when they 're in groups. example a swarm of ants, a swarm of bees, a colony of microorganism, in these scenario and in many other, biologists have informed us that the workforce of group of individuals itself reveals behavior that the character individuals don 't, or cannot. In other phrases, if we recall the workforce itself as an individual or the swarm in some ways, at least, the whole swarm seems to be more intelligent than any of the members inside it. This remark is the seed for a mass of principles and algorithms, a few of which have become related to swarm intelligence. It turns out that swarm intelligence is handiest closely related to a small element of this mass of principles and algorithms. If we search nature for scenarios wherein a group of agents reveals behavior that the individual doesn’t, it is effortless to find entire and enormous sub-areas of science, certainly in the bio-sciences. Any biological organism seems to exemplify this thought, once we keep in mind the character organism because the 'swarm ', and its cellular add-ons as agents. We could consider brains, and worried programs regularly, as a supreme exemplar of this idea, when person neurons are regarded because the agents or we might zoom in on precise inhomogeneous units of bio-molecules as our 'sellers ', and herald gene transcription, say,

11] Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms.

own behaviour in an adaptive way” (Neisser et al., 1996). There are a huge amount of different theories in relation to intelligence but this essay will pay particular focus to Robert Sternbergs Triarchic Theory of intelligence. He defines intelligence as

Humans are the most intelligent creature of all. Although, there is not one exact explanation of intelligence. According to Meriam Webster Dictionary, “Intelligent word originates from Latin- word intelligens, present participle of "intelligere", intellegere means to understand”, and definition of intelligence is, "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills”. Although, various psychologists describe the intelligence in different terms. For example, Alfred Binet said, “Intelligence is something which sensory perception test or reaction time experiments measure” Spencer said, “Intelligence is the capacity of the organism to adjust itself to an increasingly complex environment” Terman said, “Intelligence is the

history, are to be shown as part of the architect who takes a perspective of experience