The Effect Of Net Neutrality On Our Economy

"Most people in America use the internet, and when they use it they should expect to be free to search and post what they want; that is except unless they're intentionally posting or viewing something that is against the law. It's been a theory for some time that the government can view the American peoples' internet searches and browsing history, but are they and should they be doing it at all? Like in the earlier stages of our country, we will and most likely continue to have conflict with our government about certain issues, but the internet and things concerning it seems to be one of the major issues right now.

"The government has no right monitor our internet use and social media accounts. Net neutrality is “The principle that the internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites” . If Net neutrality is repealed ten internet providers will be able to limit our access to things. Net neutrality lets people express their voices online . Sources that we once had for free would have to be paid for like Youtube, instagram and many more.

I think that net neutrality is essential. There are people who say that getting rid of net neutrality would be good for the public, because it would enable services like Netflix, Google, etc. to pay internet service providers (ISPs) to make their services run faster. However, this could also mean that ISPs are able to charge users more to access certain sites. Some people believe this wouldn’t happen, because if one ISP decides to do that, they would immediately lose almost all of their customers - however, if every ISP did that, then they wouldn’t have to worry about losing customers. Another problem is that if an ISP limits traffic to a certain site, and that site doesn’t have enough revenue to pay the ISP a better connection, then that produces

If somehow we abolish net neutrality, we would come into a situation that so-called "law of the stronger" would be adopted. Large corporations will have primacy in the market, while smaller corporations will struggle to survive. And if we abolish net neutrality, I personally think that we will find the way to bypass the new rule. For example with illegal downloading, a lot of people have decided on this way, although they know it is a criminal act, because they are not in the financial situation to buy a service through the

One of the greatest factors threatening the Internet today is the attempt to dismantle net neutrality. Net neutrality is the idea of an open Internet, one on which people can freely communicate online; some Internet service providers, however, want the right to block or discriminate against any applications or content from which said companies gain no profit. If net neutrality is destroyed, then private corporations have free reign in throttling the sharing of information and of services for their consumers. This would cause private corporations to hold all the business, and we would all become consumers, simply taking what the corporations provide. Not only would this be an assault on the consumer’s right to choose, but this would completely

Net neutrality has been around for quite some time but it was up until now when that us internet users really pay attention to it because our President Donald Trump wants to pass a new net neutrality rule/bill that makes people pay to use apps that were meant to be free like Facebook and Twitter that millions use. “June 2003 Tim Wu coins the phrase network neutrality which was later shortened to net neutrality”. (Tim Wu) According to this quote net neutrality has been around since the summer of 2003 but didn't really take any effect until “February 2004 when the U.S. Federal Communications Commission introduced four principles of network freedom”. (ProQuest Staff) now therefore net neutrality did not affect communities until February of 2004.

I believe that the government does have a right to monitor internet content under certain conditions. As of now certain government officials are wanting to take internet freedom away which many believe isn't right. I personally believe that if the government believes and has proof that there is a serious crime happening on the internet then it should be taken care of. If not, then it shouldn’t be much of a problem.

The faster Internet speed one desires, the more costly it will be. Meaning that big or small companies have to pay the same flat rate for the same Internet speed. By having the same flat rate for all companies, it makes start-up firms easier to get into the market. If net neutrality were not in place, as written in the article, “Goodbye Net Neutrality…Now What?” by Michael Kassner, who attended the University of Wisconsin, stated, “Getting rid of net neutrality will allow ISPs [Internet service providers] like AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon to supply, for a price, preferential treatment to content providers.” Meaning that the ISPs will charge companies for their websites, services online, etc. to be faster. This could be a positive or negative thing for companies. If the company is a large one and can afford to pay for preferred treatment, not having net neutrality could be a good thing, as we can see from AT&T Sponsored Data service. As explained in the article by Michael Kassner the Sponsored Data service is,” Sponsoring companies agree to pay AT&T so its subscribers need not worry about monthly data limits — a digital version of the razor/razor blade theory. Content providers willing to do this are giving their users more or less a free data pass, so consumers will consider this a plus.” But there are downsides; AT&T or other ISPs can

"Net neutrality is an issue that's been on the agenda in the U.S. for years but it actually affects people all over the world. The net neutrality is a set of rules that prohibits companies, organizations, corporations, from playing favorites or regulating the sites that how much traffic and fast traffic can flow to. Every site on internet is equal and no one can restrict access or slow down access to any particular site or service and puts everything on the internet on an equal playing field that everyone has access to the same internet speed, every site has access to the same users, we really can't restrict access to anything and when we say that they repeal net neutrality, it is essentially means that they are making it right for companies to say like well on the service that i'm going to block your access to this site or i am going to slow down the speed at which you can access a particular site or a particular service and you could

Net neutrality is the idea that Internet traffic will be provided equal access to the

Net neutrality in simplest terms means that all internet content should forever be equally accessible without restriction. Meaning that internet service providers shouldn’t be able to restrict speed, which websites you access, or which load faster. So without net neutrality there is a possibility you wouldn’t be able to binge your netflix seasons or spend 3 hours on facebook. Wouldn’t that be tragic?

The prioritization of certain websites with established business models would give them a significant advantage with the ability to forestall competitor in the same market that cannot pay the ISPs to carry their traffic in the same way. Everyone who is impacted by this should know the truth and what this means to them, which would be more than 86% of the people in the United States, since that is the percent of Internet users in the U.S. according to the United States Internet Users (2014) live stats page. Network neutrality is nothing new is something that has been established for a while, but just recently has been threaten by ISPs due to a set of rulings by courts and the inability of FCC to do something about it. The internet is a unique place where everyone, no matter what, is treated equally and there is no need to destroy the fundamental thing that made the internet such a revolutionary

According to http://www.careerride.com/view/net-neutrality-advantages-and-disadvantages-20984.aspx some advantages of net neutrality include that if the net was not neutral Google, Facebook or Instagram would not have been able to reach where they are today. Curbing netizens rights to a neutral net will be a big blow for the budding entrepreneurs. Another advantage is that net neutrality protects innovation and if big companies like Google and Netflix could pay to get better treatment, faster speeds and more bandwidth. This leaves the new start-up firms at a disadvantage. Since the new start up firms have a disadvantage Netflix and Google are getting all of the followers and attention that the new and upcoming firms aren’t getting they are having to get shut down and discontinued leaving the creators with no money and nothing left.

When an ISP enables access to all content and applications regardless of what it is and where it’s coming from is called net neutrality. Net neutrality creates a balance and give equal chance to everyone whether big or small. It also lets you express your thoughts digitally through the means of internet. And it helps improve the internet everyday by letting everyone contributing to it. If net neutrality was to be removed then ISP’s would be able to control what the public can look at and watch.it will aslo snatch their digital freedom of expressing themselves freely. And it will also cause problems for small business who rely on internet to promote their businesses. But the good sight is their will be less discrimination about peoples, and

“The preferential leveraging of certain websites by telos and ISPs inherently implies reduced access to others,” Panda explains, “…this could lead to blocking others, either fully or, with choked access…” ISPs are the gateway through which all access must pass. Millions of web pages, platforms, app, services, with any and all types of information and resources available. There are small, niche sites (Reddit forums on Twilight Zone special features) to large, global content (the DOW summary) available at all hours of the day, and while the educational value of each of these would undoubtedly vary from person to person, access to both of these does not. Comparatively, in a world without net neutrality equalized education is constantly at risk depending on their whims of the ISP. Attempting to access event coverage on FOX news could be slowed or blocked completely if Comcast is your internet service provider. This not only leads to biased or even misinformation, but further monetizes the very nature of education. Paid prioritization, where those with the most financial resources can speed up access to their content, would hurt public and non-profit content providers, such as libraries, that cannot afford a fast lane for research and archival collections (Long). Additionally, because content providers that pay more for fast lanes could pass extra charges on to consumers for access to organizations that have not paid for such lanes, leading libraries and schools to end up paying more for commercial content while still losing their consumer base. ISPs are businesses at their core and thus have financial incentives to favor their own content over others, but once customers pay for their internet access, they should have the rights to choose the content they access. When someone purchases a car, they determine the route and