The Effect Of Scientific Information On The Explanation Of Psychological Phenomena Essay

This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of using a method primarily for gathering research on human subjects that can be examined for later use. It will give a basic outline of the methods of investigation, their uses and their suitability. I will also look at the scientific method as a whole and examine the criticisms of this method using the writings of Hume and Popper.

Almost all human beings agree that everyone is different and that there is a need to experiment to better understand the differences within the human race. The role of scientific experiments in psychology is an attempt to better understand the mental process of humans and the possible discovery of something in human makeup that has not been noticed by past scientists and psychologists. Experiments can change the permanent thinking of psychologists and scientists. If one psychologist theorized an idea and every other generation agreed with that view, no one voicing an opposition to the idea, then psychologists would get nowhere in understanding the human mind, failing the innate purpose of psychology- to study and answer questions about actions, thoughts, and emotions. Thus, to fulfil the need of psychology, psychologists experiment and refer back to past psychologists for ways to expand.

Whether it is the study of biopsychology and other fields of psychology or neuroscience, all psychologists and scientists are trying to understand the functions of the brain. The body and mind connection and how it reacts to certain behaviors or illnesses. Most all psychological functioning can be reduced to underlying brain processes. This should serve as reason alone as to why biology plays an important part in the study of psychology. Psychological factors play a role in whether a person develops a mental illness and in how well they recover from a mental illness, yet biological and genetic risk factors, or predispositions, are

The British Psychological Society states that ‘Psychology is the scientific study of people, the mind and behaviour’ (BPS). In this essay I will be discussing what is actually meant by this and whether psychology fits into both the traditional views of a science, as well as more contemporary perspectives. It is widely suggested that Psychology is a “coalition of specialities” meaning it is multi-disciplinary (Hewstone, Fincham and Foster 2005, page 4). I will therefore examine whether it could be considered wrong to think that all parts of the discipline should neatly fit into one view of a scientific approach.

* Predict: Offering predictions (or hypotheses) about how a given condition or set of conditions will affect

We are always curious to understand the world we live in, and what happens around us and we often believe explanations of psychological phenomena that contains neuroscientific information without any doubt. The neuroscience information includes experiments, databases, and genetic resources. It is apparent that people seem to be more interested in explanations of psychological phenomena when it is enclosed with neuroscientific information. The study conducts experiments on whether people accepted explanations about psychological phenomena with neuroscientific information more satisfying than explanation without any neuroscientific information. The goal of this experiment was to see if neuroscience explanations have any effects on people’s rating of how satisfying they found good and bad explanations in general and those with or without neuroscientific information. The board question is why is cognitive neuroscience information so interesting to the public? Are people capable of judging good explanations from bad explanations of psychological phenomena? The specific question is that, is people 's fascination with cognitive neuroscience associated with explanations that involve neuropsychological component? Does the addition of neuroscience information to phenomena affect people 's judgment of good and bad explanations?

The Biological Perspective: This is the study of exactly how the physical events within the physical body interact with the events in the external environment. This is expressed by our perceptions, memories, behaviors and interactions with everything around us. We can think about our heredity and genetic makeup and the influences that has on each one of us as an individual. Then think about the stress of poor health and illness and how we may express our emotions with those around us. Since we are diverse as individuals we rely on our physiological make up and the stimuli of our environment to adapt to each situation. This human biology helps us to constantly adapt and survive in an ever-changing world.

Researchers come up with new discoveries on a day to day basis. These days we know more about our physiology than let's say 1000 years ago. However, there is still a lot of unchartered territories. And because of this, people have created an unlimited amount of myths associated with the human brain.

Humans have inhabited the Earth for thousands of years and it is perceived by many that we are among the most intellectual species on this planet. Although having lived on this planet for so long, being able to distinguish fact from fiction has escaped the minds of many. People of today’s society are easily influenced by what is told to them instead of what can be proven. Believing in something that has no scientific evidence is not only absurd but can be classified simply as ignorance. Many of the erratic ideas that are believed by many today have originated in a time where superstition was more popular than science. These beliefs appear to be proven by science, but in reality are not valid and frequently confused with

The remainder of the essay is a series of reports of scientific research focused on Demystifying insight. 2- The authors use of facts is obviated in this article by numerous examples of extensive research. Cognitive neuroscientist Mark Jung-Beeman, studied right brain activity using word puzzles.

Human interest stories in the mainstream media have captivated the attention of many in comparison to other categories of news. The reason behind it is that human interest can sometimes be by the news editors to look surprising, extraordinary, and interesting with the aim of attracting more viewership since this is good for business. Well established media outlets both print and electronic such as The Guardian, The New York Times and others have a psychology dedicated department that sources for psychology related news with an aspect of human interest stories to inform, educate, and entertain their viewership or readership. The brain and the cognitive ability of the viewers are what is psychologically appealed to when the human interest stories

I chose Gestalt Psychology for my first perspective, it is how people experience objects and perceive things as a whole. Gestalt allows us to look at everyday objects and distinguish them from their surroundings. Without the Gestalt Theory people would see every atom that made up a whole object. As I look at my computer screen, I do not see every little atom, I see the screen as a whole. From this perspective, learning objects as a whole instead of each individual part is beneficial because it allows us to open our minds for new learning experiences. However, there may be things in life that do not provide enough visual clues to determine what it is supposed to be.

This research article was taken from the Association for Psychological Science (APS) Journal. This specific issue had a total of ten articles, and while they are covering different topics and studies, some of them do focus on similar ideas. Psychology is all about the study of the mind, and how it has different parts intended for unique functions. It seems like a good portion of the articles for this specific journal deal with emotions and how the body interprets them. One article deals with the stress of different generations, while another deals with an individual’s willpower against sugar. There is an article about self-esteem and how that varies during a lifetime, as well as an article on cooperation. The article that will be specifically discussed in this research paper also has to deal with how the body interprets things when it comes to a stressful situation, such as a crime. It looks at how reliable eyewitness testimony is after traumatic events, specifically in regards to lineups.

Psychology enables us to better understand, explain and predict human behaviour, emotions and mental processes therefore defining psychology as the scientific study of behaviour. Psychologists seek to collect data through observations, laboratory experiments, thematic analysis etc which enables researchers to gain knowledge about our behaviour and to make appropriate conclusions. This essay will seek to evaluate how psychology has become scientific over time, in particular looking at how psychology was scientific during the 1870’s and in present time. The major psychologists relevant to this essay are Wunt, James, Pavlov, Piaget and Baddeley focusing on their role to making psychology a science. Finally, this essay will also seek to describe Newton’s influence on psychology.

Theories of Knowledge and Psychological Applications How individuals are able to obtain knowledge is something that psychologists have studied for a number of years. The ability to store and retrieve knowledge provides individuals with the propensity to form logical thought, express emotions and internalize the world around them. In order for a psychologist to understand the theories of knowledge it is necessary to investigate the aspects of the theories. In this paper we examine the history , the basic construct, the similarities of the theories and how those theories relate to psychological therapies. History of the theories      The neural network model attempts to explain that which is known about