The Effects Of Animal Cruelty

Animals are now used as objects of experiments to test a variety of products; like shampoo, makeup, and medicines. Animals are almost always used in cancer research but animals never get the human form of cancer which affects the lungs. Animals are not required in animal testing, but people seem to ignore this statement and test on animals anyway. Testing cosmetics on animals is somewhat pointless because animals have different skin and hair than humans have. Animals are not even required in animal testing at all; a makeup company can release an untested product at their own risks. If any product says “cruelty free” on it, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the products inside the product were not tested on. Animals are used to test so many products now-a-days, animals are used to test so many useless

For many years, the field of science has used animals in medical experiments worldwide, because of this innocent animals are being killed everyday. They are being tested with new drugs, new treatments, and by many makeup companies. Connecticut recently celebrated the passage of the “Beagle Freedom Law”, a law that requires laboratories to work with charities and rescue groups to find homes for research cats and dogs. Animals are being tested so humans do not have to be but animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings, although animals are the closest thing to humans. Most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of innocent animal subjects. Over 100 million animals suffer a year from testing. Testing animals is a lot more expensive than alternative methods and it is wasting government research dollars. Animal testing is not only a bad idea, but it is also inhuman and it should not be tolerated. The FDA should stop allowing animal testing. An animal does not give out the same results on a test than a human would.

Eyes being injected with chemicals, tests that are causing mutations, an endless cycle of torture. Every life is just as important as another. If all those things were done to humans just to have a better appearance it would be a way bigger deal. Instead scientists are doing this to animals and most don’t seem to care as long as they get their long volumized lashes, their plump colorful lipsticks, their soft hair, their de-wrinkle skin replenishing lotions, no one cares as long as they’re benefitting from it. Animal testing shouldn’t be allowed; It should be banned. Testing cosmetics on animals is not only unnecessary but also cruel and inhumane. Things like mascara aren’t just tested on “gross rats” but also dogs, cats, bunnies, pigs, sheep, monkeys, birds, ferrets and many more cute little animals.

There are ethical considerations about testing on humans. Another argument is that these tests are essential for humans and people to live better lives. These are valid concerns, however, although testing on humans should not be done, it is also unacceptable for any being to be treated this way. J.P Glick points out, “we have consistently undermined animals mental complexity and pain sensitivity,” animals are put in danger without giving them any means of defense. The fact that it improves human lives is untrue as 9 out of 10 drugs tested successful on animals end up being harmful for humans. There are much safer routes such as the aforementioned alternative

Experimentation on animals is cruel and unneeded. Because the results will never be identical to human results, testing of diseases on animals does not help human health (PETA). This shows that experimentation for diseases is pointless. According to PETA, “Although at least 85 HIV/AIDS vaccines have been successful in nonhuman primate studies, as of 2010, every one of nearly 200 preventive and therapeutic vaccine trials has failed to demonstrate benefit to humans.” This explains how animal testing is useless because it does not even help with human vaccines. PETA also claims, “Ninety-two percent of drugs—those that have been tested on animals and in vitro—do not make it through Phase 1 of human clinical trials.” This proves that testing drugs on animals does not help humans in any way. Not only is animal testing unnecessary, but is also very cruel to

The alternative to using animals in the lab would be carrying out these tests on people. It would be a quite difficult to find any willing volunteers that would give informed consent in testing out a new drug. Secondly, it would be unethical to stop animal research as it would radically sway the development of new knowledge and treatment flow to those in dire health conditions (Gauthier & Griffin, 2005). Also, scientific research uses up fewer animals compared to those that are killed for food. Research shows that approximately seven hundred more animals are used for food than in research.

Although many people argue that animal testing makes a lot of medical advancements, most of the experiments are flawed. First of all, according to procon.org “9 out of 10 drugs that appear safe in animal studies fail in humans.” This argues the point that animals and humans aren’t the same. While we have some similarities, they are not the same so we should not be testing on them. In the same matter, procon.org also says, “ 87% of the studies failed to randomize the animal selection.” This means that they are using the same animals for the tests and they are using the same type of animals. In short, most of the experiments are flawed, the drugs don’t work on humans, and they are failing to randomize animal selection.

Hello Collin, I do not know much about your topic, I only know the basics about it, so it would be very interesting to read your paper when it is done. That being said you are on the right track to lengthen your paper, but for the final draft your are going to have to have it at least eight pages not five pages. Therefore you might want to find a lot more information and if you do not have a counter-argument or a rebuttal you definitely want to add those into your paper. I know it will probably be hard to find positives for animal cruelty, but you have to incorporate both sides of the story into your paper. Also you said you want to make your conclusion to be smoother and flow better, while this is a good thing you should not stop there. You

Seeing as humans are animals it is morally wrong to use animals to test human products. Due to the false information put out by the media, those who support animal believe what the media states about it being a necessary evil. The so-called benefits from animal testing have not helped humans for years, but is now legally required in many countries. Although alternatives have been found, few steps have been taken to put an end to animal experimentation. The way activists present their argument is partially the reason they are not taken seriously. Animal testing is morally wrong and had not benefited humans as the media has claimed, but there are alternatives if only humans would take the first step.

However, most of the commonly tested animals are not protected. “Labs that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are exempted from the minimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA)” (“11 Facts”). In addition, many individuals retort that they would prefer using animals because if not, we would have to test on humans. As argued on peta.org, “The fact is that we already do test new drugs on people. No matter how many tests on animals are undertaken, someone will always be the first human to be tested on” (“Animal”). Animals are just being tested on in addition to humans. Its commonly argued that every major medical advance is attributable to experiments on animals. On peta.org it explains why that's not true, “Most experiments on animals are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances, and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (“Animal”).

Humans are animals, and as such it is morally wrong to use them to test pharmaceuticals intended for use by humans. Those who support animal experimentation believe it is a necessary evil, in part due to the false information put out by the media. The so-called benefits of animal testing have not helped humans for years, yet in many countries the law still requires researchers use animals to test their medications. In fact, although alternatives have been found, few steps have been taken to put an end to animal experimentation. Unfortunately, the way the activists present their argument that is one main reason they are not taken seriously, even though their points are valid. Animal testing is morally wrong and has not benefited humans as the media has claimed, but there are alternatives, such as new technology, if only humans would take the first step.

There’s many forms of animal cruelty out in the world. I’ve chosen to speak about animal cruelty in the form of cosmetic treatments. Many people do not realize that animals are used as a form of testing for not only cosmetic companies but many companies that produce the simplest things like laundry detergent, soap, shampoo and body washes. Animals get all these product tested on the everyday. Imagine how many time those chemicals get thrown in the wrong combination and cause abnormal things or decay in skin. It’s inhumane.

“ Over 18 million animals are used in research and experimentation in the United States” - ( Lubinski ).Many animals around the world are tested to help find cures for diseases. While doing this animals get harmed, suffer severe side effects, and in some cases death. Animals are innocent they did nothing to deserve going through these severe punishments. Animals have the same life importance as humans, many think otherwise. Many people feel that humans should go through medical research because animals live shorter lives than humans so they should be able to live their lives as long as possible including myself.. Another way to not have animals go through medical testing is by having humans that are willing to sacrifice their lives to help cure others, because animals do not have a say at all in wanting to do medical research. Animals should not be used for product or medical research.

Some people oppose the use of animals in medical experiments. They think that it is unfair to animals and animal abuse. Animal testing is wrong, because the animal cannot say so they had no choice. For example, Animals can't talk, animals cannot do anything when they starting to experiment. As there is one article that, “Animals are routinely cut open, poisoned and put into cages for weeks, month, or even year” (Ocean Lu Blog). So, they think that animals do not deserve to do these things for them. However, animal testing it is a great way to make sure to research the products is safe before retail and letting people use. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for science and commercial testing. Animals were

Society believes that it is inhumane to do research on animals to save human lives but would not volunteer to do the testing on ourselves when testing on something is required for medical purposes. If no one is willing to volunteer to get tested for drugs that required testing, then there would not be any other way, but to test it on animals. While some believe that animal research to save human life is violating animals’ rights and inhumane, animal research has saved many lives including animal themselves and the discoveries of many treatments, prevention from certain infections, and drugs that we are using today.