The Effects Of British Colonization On The World Essay

After the Industrial revolution started in Europe the Europeans needed raw material from other countries and from that came the Idea of Imperialism when one country takes over another. Although what the British were doing seemed to be benefiting India was actually doing the opposite. Many things that the Europeans did to India weather it was political, economic, or social the Europeans found ways to have those things benefit the British and very little or not at all to the Indian.

The Impact Britain had and a negative side and a positive but we can say that they had more of a negative impactWhen colonizing Australia they were introduced with to new plants, animals and many more new undiscovered things. In some cases they had a devastating effect. Destruction an deforestation occurred during when Britain colonized Australia, most habitats were cleared for settlements which impacted negatively.Colonisation by the British had an lasting effect on the Aborigines, their culture, way of life, freedom and their future.When the British conquered the Aborigines were disposed from their land and goods. The Aborigines were forced out of their hunting grounds and stayed away from the coastal area where they possessed a lot

European colonization changed the economy, culture, and history in general, therefore making it a hugely influential event. Not only did it change Europe, but it completely changed the New World.

The British East India Company changed the lives of people in Britain by bringing them new unique foods, luxuries and spices. It also brought them new land to colonize on. The British East India Company gave Britain its army and its navy. Some of the unique foods and spices that the British East India Company brought to Britain was tea, salt, pepper, cloves and many more. One new luxury that the

“Englishmen.. have given the people of India the greatest human blessing - peace.” (Dutt). Merely coming to India in the 1600s to trade, the British East India Company established trading outposts. After ridding of French influence in India during the Seven Years’ War and having Indians mutiny against British rule, Britain gained full control of India. India has been under the imperialist control of the British until their independence in 1947. British imperialism caused some negative effects on India through poverty and persecution, but retained more of a positive impact due to its massive improvements in the modernization of India and the overall improvement of Indian civilization.

British imperialism lasted for hundreds of years and has had staggering effects in India that we can still see today. Britain initially became interested in India in the 1600’s; the government set up trading posts around the country because it was interested in the raw materials and resources available. At first Britain used indirect rule through Sepoys -- Indian soldiers -- but after the Sepoy Rebellion Britain had to step in to rule directly. Although British imperialism had positive effects such as eradicating immoral customs and paving the way for modern India, it also had numerous negative effects, such as by creating laws to better control Indians which left their government negatively impacted, taking from India with no concern for the

The British originally came in as a decent sized company in East India, but when the sepoys attacked that company, England sent their whole army and navy to get the sepoys under control, but while doing that they also took over all of India. Although economically and socially the Indians did benefit in some ways, the British established a massive infrastructure by controlling India and having a huge political, economic, and social impact on India that helped them more than it helped the Indians.

From: Romesh Dutt, The Economic History of India Under Early British Rule Englishmen…have given the people of India the greatest human blessing – peace. They have introduced Western education. This has brought an ancient and civilized nation in touch with modern thought, modern sciences and modern life. They have built an administration that is strong and efficient. They have framed wise laws and have established courts of justice.

The study of British colonialism is a rather new field with much to discuss and a lot more to debate. The recent recognition of new nation-states that were once under the control of Britain was a growing phenomenon and one that continues to play a large role in today’s global politics. Since the rather recent period of these new nations, new study’s have been done into the history of a) the peoples that inhabited the land before Britain, b) the way Britain occupied and control and land, and now c) post-Britain. This is a growing topic in the historical field because seventy-five years ago there was no thought that Britain would relieve control of India or Nigeria. That is why post-British colonialism is important to today, because it is a

Rudyard Kipling was an English writer who commented on the different aspects of British imperialism in India. Kipling viewed going abroad letting progressive imperialism ensue was a burden that white people carried.

Through the Europeans ruthless suppression of American Indians, Europeans believed that they could establish a profitable agricultural economy, that through European civilization could permanently alter the landscape and social structure in America. In hopes of discovering treasure in the new world, “Spanish military forces established their domination over the land once ruled by natives.” This brutal military conquest directed towards American Indians was done to seek riches, and establish elements of European civilization such as nation states, national courts, national armies, and a national tax system. All new ideas Europeans brought over with the intention of colonizing in the new world, “unlike the conquistadores, who left little but

     In one of his most famous poems, Rudyard Kipling said, "Take up the white man's burden!" (146). He was only one of many who believed in the virtues of imperialism in the late nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries. During that period, imperialism was on the rise, and Africa was being swallowed up by competing European nations. The imperialists had many arguments supporting imperialism. They said it was beneficial and, in some cases, essential. Their arguments did not satisfy everyone, but that did not bother them. The justifications ranged from economics to social services, while touching on everything else in between (Hayes 222-3).

Colonialism, which was a major cause of the north-south gap that occurred in the period following the Second World War, is the takeover by a nation of foreign territories; making them part of it to aid its own economical, social and political structures. The mother countries succeed in doing that by using the colony’s natural resources, money savings, and their lands, which leads the colony to rely on the mother country and therefore, leaving the country underdeveloped. Hence, the world wide scramble for colonies, particularly in the late 19th – early 20th century, had a tremendous negative effect on the economic, social, and political structures of indigenous, non-industrialized peoples.

When asked if some nations are more productive than others, many are hesitant to acknowledge that destabilized countries are the result of parasitic relationships with more substantial governing bodies. Imperialism enacted a literal empire of enforcing foreign customs into a less developed nation, regardless of size or population. Since industrialization began in Britain in the 16th century, European countries and their colonies were the first to perceive the need for mass production of weapons. In response to Britain’s possession legitimacy of 19th century Chinese territories, Chinese leaders constituted the territorial organization known as “One China, Two Systems” today. Before this arrangement, China and Britain conflicted over the role of free trade in coastal cities, and these Opium Wars quickened modernization to redeem the century of imperialism. Considering the prolonged time China has been in existence compared to western nations, its introspective policy ignited dissatisfaction when citizens realized the contrast. Although an improving economic powerhouse today, China still suffers the effects of 19th century British imperialism, with its democratic and defensive strategies to such imperialism weakening economic efficiency.

The Dutch India East Company was formed in 1602 and they established many ports and forts in Southeast Asia and their central operation was at Batavia. On the other hand, in 1600, the East India Company was formed and their specialization was on spice trade in India. The agenda of the foreign companies was the ability to trade and established themselves as a monopoly over the local traders. Thus, these profit-driven companies were more willing to engage in peaceful trading as opposed to conquest. As such, some people may argue that this agenda was not the fire to the start colonization as there were agreements and treaties between the local rulers and the companies to give them the rights to do trading. However, these companies were given the autonomy to territorial expansion and the privilege to exercise power and control over these territories in foreign lands. In 1757, the EIC began to take control the vast land of India and subsequently, the British government took over India in 1858. This proved that the greed for profits slowly encroached India and the British saw the opportunities to gain greater economic benefits for their own well-being and led to the conquering of India. As such, the ignition for imperialism was fuelled by economic greed as even though the primary goal for the foreign traders was profit but it slowly grew into