The Effects Of Issues And Personality On Leader Evaluations

The Funnel of Causality model describes voting behaviour in terms of socio-demographics, party identification, issues, and candidates. In this essay I will focus on issues because they can be compared between countries. An issue is essentially a problem that is perceived to be important, and there is an actor with “ownership” of the issue, meaning that there is someone who is thought to be “the best man for the job” so to speak. The economy isn’t an issue because you can’t have “ownership” over the economy. Issues are important because they explain a lot about voting behaviour.

The book “The Persuadable Voter” by Sunshine Hillygus and Todd Shields examines voters decisions and actions with a focus on persuadable voters. Hillygus and Shields define the persuadable voter as a reasoned voter who vote might change, is undetermined or may not agree with their party. Persuadable voters are often used synonymously with independents and those without a strong partisanship towards one party or the other. Persuadable voters have been often simplified without much examination that goes into what causes these voters to be persuadable or influenceable. Hillygus and Shields question modern myths about persuadable voters and offer their own thoughts on the topic. The authors found that the persuadable voters

In this paper I intend to evaluate the voting habits of the American public. I will look at how race, sex, education level, marital status, income level, current employment status, and age affects whether or not people vote. I am also going to examine which political parties these groups have historically voted for, why they vote for them, how this has changed over the years if it has changed at all, and why it has changed.

Regardless of an individual’s political enthusiasm, the 2016 election cycle was one of, if not the most widely discussed election cycles in the history of the United States. Citizens and non- citizens from across the globe seemed to voice their opinions about either presidential candidate at one point or the other, the same goes for various House and Senatorial, except on a smaller scale. This essay will focus on the outcomes of the 2016 general elections thought an in-depth analysis of the following criteria; who voted for the candidates in the presidential and senatorial races, what was the reasoning behind their vote, when these individuals decide to vote, where the voters came out to vote and how that differed from previous election cycles and finally why this election cycle was so unique in its predictions and outcomes.

There is great evidence to suggest that short-term factors have been very influential in the voting behaviour of the electorate today. To support this, Denver in 2003, noted that voting is now much influenced by the opinions and

The Rational Choice model, developed originally by Anthony Downs, suggests that most voters do not strongly identify with political parties. By providing a model that places voters and each party candidate on a scale ranging from extremely liberal to extremely conservative, rational choice allows for the understanding of a person’s decision to vote. As Dr. Daron Shaw argues, by using “proximity voting” or “directional voting,” we can understand how voters decide how to vote by analyzing several relevant factors influencing their support for a specific party candidate. However, criticisms on the rational choice model are apparent in that it assumes a high level of knowledge, a “single dimension” in “political competition,” and incorrect prediction

In an idealistic world it would be proper to say that all voters are extremely well-informed on all the nuances, platforms and information regarding elections and their vying candidates. However, voters do not determine the election’s outcome purely on the basis of the candidates’ merit, competence and convictions but rather there are other factors that play a role as well. Moreover, campaigns are stimulus fields that try to produce psychological mediators like persuading, priming or framing. However, before the voters can even receive any information, there is variance in the delivery of information in the first place. And this leads to knowledge gaps which in turn are reflected in the voters’ decisions which, for the most part, are based on their preconceived dispositions and as such, the information that they receive through various venues does not persuade them as much as it simply affirms their position.

“The way you lead when crisis forces you to tap into your deepest values and instincts. In this state, your instinctively know what to do: you rise to the occasion and perform at your best”.

Most of the academic research between the relationship of the economy and presidential elections categorize voters as either retrospective or prospective voter. Morris Fiorna, in his work “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis” discusses about the retrospective economic voter hypothesis

Individuals frequently vote in favor of competitor with qualities that they like. Voters might be pulled in to, or repulsed by their own particular political socialization. Now and again these qualities are more clear than others, and voters may depend in generalizations of competitors. Another individual trademark that appears to be vital is topography, which for this situation, implies the district the applicant is recognized as being from. One trademark that should have any kind of effect is social foundation, which is the suspicion that voters pick a competitor whom they accept are like themselves as far as social class. Candidates do endeavor to give off an impression of resembling normal individuals, yet a strikingly high number of congressmen and representatives are moguls yet most Americans distinctly are definitely not. Same goes for education. Most Congressmen and presidents since Harry Truman have been educated, yet just 30% of Americans have. Many voters likewise impact by a competitor’s identity which incorporates vices for trustworthiness, vitality and

In Module 1, I completed the Teacher Leader Self-Assessment (2009). At that time, I felt I fit into the “developing” or “proficient” category in the skills and knowledge areas. With the knowledge and skills gained through this course, I now feel I have moved into the “proficient” or “refining” categories of the skills and knowledge areas. At this time, I am confident I would enjoy and strive in a coaching role, with my confidence and knowledge, to help the adult and student learners in my current (or any) district. I am more comfortable in all of the categories of this self-assessment, which include: Working with Adult Leaders, Collaborative Work, Communication, Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy, and Systems Thinking (2009).

The other most significant factor is, interestingly, the candidates in a given election. Alvarez et al. found that in the 2008 election, 31.2% of people reported not liking the choices provided to them as a major factor in not voting (33). Of these individuals, 48% self-identified as Republican compared to 35% who self-identified as Democrat (34). Of the respondent pool, the 13 percentage point difference in political part self-identification may not be significant though rising partisanship and the subsequent Tea Party movement may have played a

The purpose of a leader is to establish a purpose or goal, create a strategy to accomplish that goal and gain trust of others to believe in your strategy (Candela Open Course, n.d.). Leaders are only as strong or as weak as their strongest and weakest members of the team. Leaders need to examine the team members and find the strong points and the weak points of the members and assist in improving the weakest area and training. The saying of “There is no I in Team”, is correct since not just one person can accomplish the goal, it takes a team working on multiple areas of the task.

Researchers have focused their efforts towards the link between effectiveness of leaders and personality traits. They tend to reach a consensus indicating that the effectiveness of a leader is established by her/his personality traits. In this context, the performance and success of leaders is measured by personality traits. Organizations use different models to assess an individual's personality traits. Some strategies employed to determine included the use of trait approach in establishing whether a leader is charismatic (Anderson, Reckenrich & Kupp, 2011).

also receiving much controversy and backlash from various states that are not part of the UBE. Since we don’t have the money to move to another state, it will be less beneficial in gaining employment when he is limiting himself to one branch of law when thousands can open if he would just be willing to take a risk. I had to understand his perspective, fears, and doubts to put his mind at ease to take a chance.