The Effects Of Organized Games On Playground Aggression Essay

But the question remains: Can scientists, with certainty, conclude that an activity that most children and teenagers partake in, lead to violence in such a small percentage of those children and teenagers?

The author, Jean M Twenge Ph.D. who wrote “Yes, Violent Video Games Do Cause Aggression”( 2012) says, violent video games are definitely the main cause of the increase in violence. In the article by Twenge, she states, “ studies have shown that violent video games actually cause aggression...it could be that aggressive kids want to play aggressive games, or that an outside factor such as family background causes both” (Twenge 2012) Twenge goes on about how many people play video game so they are reluctant to give them up, including the designers. “It makes sense that the video game industry would not want to believe that their product leads to aggression and violence in real life”. If it was proven that video games were the cause of violence, would people stop purchasing games? Twenge continues on to assert that she wants violent video games off the shelf “taking away violent video games would not end mass shootings. But the best evidence available suggests that it would reduce real-life aggression”(2012). Twenge's evidence proves that less violent video games would improve the youth, and make them less aggressive.

According to Hollingdale and Greitemeyer (2014), Video games that are violent are identified as very popular games that are played by the consumers. There is a concern that violent video games may pose a public health risk due to the levels of aggression due to the effects of the video games. In a cross sectional studies it has been found that there is a positive correlations with real life and video game aggression. Also in longitudinal studies shows that playing violent video games constantly it can predict that there may be later aggression even after controlling for initial levels of aggression. Experimental studies have showed that playing the video game is a factor of an increase level of

The goal of this action research project is to determine if a structured recess program would decrease aggressive behavior on the playground which in turn would decrease the number of behavior referral forms that would have to be written. There is a growing problem in our schools; children do not know how to play during recess time. Children are spending more and more time in front of the television, video games, or other sedentary non-play activities. They are not learning how to play properly with other children and are coming to school not knowing what to do during their recess (Patrick, 1996). As they enter school it is now the schools job to teach the students how to correctly interact while playing at recess. Recess needs to be the fourth ‘R’ taught in school (Pellegrini, & Bohn, 2005). Putting students on the playground for recess time when they do not know how to play and interact with other students will only lead to boredom and inappropriate behavior. To avoid these inappropriate behaviors schools have started to use a more structured recess approach to teach children how to play and interact while on the playground. The question then becomes what structured recess program to use and will this program be truly affective?

For many teenagers in America, simulated games with violence are all they do and all they think about. You can argue that violent games teach kids to strategize quickly, but what about all of the negative effects? Kids are proven to be more aggressive playing these violent role playing games. Psychologists who study human behavior won’t even let their own kids play these barbaric games. Also violent games can cause kids to lose sympathy and be immune to traumatic experiences. Kids should be limited on playing these violent games so they aren’t a risk to themselves or others.

In another article called the “Priming Effect Of Computer Game Violence On Children’s Aggression Levels” by EBSCO

When it comes to aggression in sports there are many different factors that play a role in causing it. Athletes may get themselves involved many situations because of on the field aggression, and bring their problems home and take it out on their wife. Another reason that athletes are involved with aggression is because the use of alcohol and drugs. Last but not least, some of these pro athletes are used to being physical all the time and they sometimes forget how strong they are and something that is meant to be unintentional can turn into something serious, fast. I will now explain deeper the reasons that I believe each of these contribute to. Aggression of the field

One theory that prompted research on how boys and girls differ in the expression of aggression was that boys are more aggressive than girls’ theory. Several researchers in the past suggest that boys act in aggressive way within the peer group context for physical dominance (Crick, gropeter 2012). The idea was the exploratory examination of gender differences in patterns of association between physical aggression and the social interaction revealed that the relationships were only true for boys. In other word,

As children, the playground is a place they look forward to going. A place where they learn many important things while having fun. By playing with others that may be of the same age group, they are learning how to make friends, share, and interact with others. They are learning and developing their communication as well as social skills. Unfortunately, the playground is also a place where children learn and experience the concept of bullying. In the article the playground gets even tougher, Pamela Paul brings up the point that bullying is starting at an earlier age, as early as kindergarten. The article focused on the how often bullying occurred on school playgrounds. A group of kindergarten girls regularly picked on and harassed scarlett.

In his experiment, we can see how negative surroundings correlate with negative behaviors. Say we have a young boy expressing rough behavior while exposed to abusive care while another boy is exposed to kind and loving care and expressed calm behavior. The behaviors that the boys express are highly influenced by their environments in many ways. These include parental guidance, social media, television programs, video games, or peer pressures. In my opinion, lack of parental guidance is a strong contributing factor to our society’s growth towards violence.

Participation in rough-and-tumble sports can increase aggressive behavior. Jeffrey Goldstein wrote his encyclopedic review Aggression and Crimes of Violence, he concluded that participation in athletic activities has a measurable effect on aggressive behavior, increasing it in proportion to the level of aggression contained within the particular sport engaged in. Contact sports like hockey, football, basketball, rugby, and soccer pose a greater risk than non contact sports like tennis and golf. Aggression is contagious. This has led to the constant debate within educational, mental health, and coaching circles about how to prevent this type of aggression in the first place or, if that fails, how to contain it when it does occur.

For many years, there have been arguments over violent video games and their harmful effects. The standards for violence in today’s society are different than when video games were first introduced. A person’s personality plays into how they are effected by violence. In an article written for the American Psychological Association, Patrick Markey determined, “certain combinations of personality traits can help predict which young people will be more adversely affected by violent video games.” He also stated “those who are negatively affected have pre-existing dispositions, which make them susceptible to such violent media.” (APA).

Another study discusses how teachers are inadequately trained, and do not have enough information and understanding about how management practice should be used (Eleftheria, Kafenia, & Andreou, n.d.). Common misbehaviors in early childhood grade levels can include impulsivity, hyperactivity and aggression. The schools inability to meet the student’s needs and inadequate socialization can cause challenging behaviors, such as disrupted sleeping and eating routines, physical and verbal aggression, property destruction, severe tantrums, self-injury, non-compliance, and withdrawal (Eleftheria, Kafenia, & Andreou, n.d.). Moving away from a punishment approach is more effective. Starting positive behavior approaches in lower grade levels, such as kindergarten will result in better classroom management. Student involvement and academic achievement can decrease disruptive behaviors. The child of study often works in groups within his classroom. During group work, misbehaviors are more likely to occur because the child does not like participating in group work. The child at times is misunderstood by other students. If the child was more involved and interested in group work, the disruptive behaviors are less likely to occur. Also during group work the behavior chart is enforced. The child of study is sometimes asked to move his behavior card down to yellow during group

Since their appearance in the market, video games are the often the subject of moral debates. Parents are afraid they will influence their children to act out and commit crimes. Mental health professionals worry they'll impact psychological development. In most cases, this is the result of the need of a scapegoat. People need something to blame for the wrong they observe in the immediate world around them. Video games follow rock'n'roll, comic books, and even radio in a long list of sources of moral panic. There is no evidence to support the claim that they are, without a doubt, the reason for violent crime in teens.

Federal and state policies have also contributed in making it harder for children to play outside during the school hours. The No Child Left Behind Act created in 2001 have affected elementary schools to reduce the amount of time children are given to play during recess. In fact the reduced times are spent more on preparing students for standardized tests and for students to meet new school goals (Sacks, 2005). Thus, this explains clearly