The Effects Of Parenting Styles On The Psychological Development Of Children And Adolescents

999 Words4 Pages
In recent years, researchers have gathered a significant amount of knowledge in understanding the influence of different parenting styles on the psychological development of children and adolescents. Today, there are four vital parenting styles in psychology: authoritative, neglectful, indulgent and authoritarian. Each style possesses its own different characteristics and each produce different psychological developments in children and adolescents. In order to understand the effects of parenting styles on a person’s psychological development, it is obligatory we consider how a particular parenting style affects a child and adolescent’s development psychologically. This upcoming report will be paying particular attention to neglectful…show more content…
The study recruited parents of 2,127, however only 50.7% (1,075) consented to participate.
Parents were to complete three subscales from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Shelton, Frick and Wootton, 1996) to evaluate monitoring/supervision, inconsistent discipline and positive parenting on a 5-point scale, 0 being ‘never’, to 4 being ‘always’. When all the data was collected, the average of each mother and father was calculated. Averages across grades 1-12 = .52 for monitoring, .37 for inconsistent discipline, and .35 for positive parenting; ps <.001) (Tildesley and Andrews, 2008)
In another study, to determine the relationship between parenting and delinquency. Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber focused on parenting from separate point of views, identifying parenting dimensions, style and behaviours in correlation to delinquency. They first investigated the immensity of these associations and which had the strongest relationship with juvenile behaviour. The second motive was to analyse potential moderators of the parenting-delinquency link and their relative importance. (Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber, 1986)
In another study, researchers explored how parenting accounted for interindividual differences (comparing one child with another) in developmental routes of different child behaviours across childhood and adolescence. Researchers picked out from a cohort sequential community sample of 1,049 children, inactive class
Get Access