The Effects Of Poor Leadership On Good Leadership

The importance of effective leadership and its impact on improving student achievement are evident in today’s schools (Leithwood, Louis, Anderson, and Wahlstrom, 2004). While the school principal is traditionally thought to be the school leader, Glickman (1989) proposes that “the principal of successful schools is not the instructional leader but the educational leader who mobilizes the expertise, talent, and care of others” (p. 8). Lumpkin, Claxton, and Wilson (2014) contend that helping “each school fulfill its mission and energize and expand the professionalism and professional contributions of teachers, the expertise of all teachers, especially teacher leaders, is needed” (p. 59). Teachers directly impact student learning, and

One of the profound challenges that the United States of America faces today is poor leadership. I’m not just speaking about the President of the United States, but all those that are leading our great country. Our leaders today have poor communication skills, self-serving nature, poor character nevertheless they are not looking forward to helping the United States of America.

From a business perspective, the ramifications of leadership failure differ in size depending on the severity of the situation. If market conditions are fixed and the competitive atmosphere is not extraordinarily punishing, leadership failures may not be that bad for the business. If, however, the market is going through dramatic change, which demands equally dramatic change in the organization, failure to

The management problem is about a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Precision Imaging Centers (PIC), which affects the corporate guidance, display ineffective communication skills, lack of employee motivation, presents questionable actions of moral leadership, and inspire the need for corporate change. First of all, the CEO does not present a mission for the PICs corporation and no vision can be formed; therefore, lacks corporate direction and lacks supportive communication within the organization. Secondly, the officer displays ineffective communication skills with department managers and the actions prove to be an obstacle, which effect interpersonal and conceptual skills throughout the company. In addition, the

There are many things that can make someone a poor leader. He can be lazy, rude, unfair, etc. In my case, the worst leader I ever had was the boss I had when I worked for an insurance company. My boss played favorites, gave away her work, micromanaged, lacked human skills, and recorded everything that someone did wrong. All of these factors are what make her the worst leader I ever had.

The leadership approach employed in an organization affects the vision, growth, and possible success of an organization (Malewska & Sajdak, 2014; Yukl, 2013). When organizational leaders employ strategic leadership, they consider various elements including internal and external factors that can affect performance, the influence leaders have on people and processes, situations that may alter a leader’s ability to affect performance, cultures within the organization, disaster planning, succession planning, and the role of role of executive teams (Malewska & Sajdak, 2014; Yukl, 2013). Two organizations that provide insight into strategic leadership are Costco and Nissan.

In any organization, decision making serves as a factor which could either break it or make it. Hence, it is important that sound decisions are made so that the goals of a certain organization or company are realized. Aside from that, profits and productivity are expected to increase if decisions are able to meet the demands of business trends. In traditional organizational structures, decisions are lodged in the topmost stages of the ladder. In other words, only the top executives make the decisions for the company’s future and direction. In some instances, only the chief executive officer will only decide for the company. As a

Strategy is the next domain that with bad judgment it could lead to a fatal outcome. The role of the leader is to lead the organization to success and when the current strategic road is not leading toward success then it is the leader’s job to find a new path. There are two functions that show how well a leader can make strategic judgment calls; first is his or her own ability to look over the horizon and frame the right question and second the people with whom he or she chooses to interact with. For instance, Jack Welch is the CEO of General Electric and he ultimately created his famous “#1, #2, fix, close or sell strategy”. Welch believed that the only way General Electric was going to succeed was to do business with only the number one or number two in their industries. With Welch watching the company for over twenty years, he was intentionally looking for their markets that were number one and number two that they have missed good opportunities. Since General Electric was too focused in one situation, Welch made all business head redefine their

Strategic leadership entails making decisions across different cultures, agencies, agendas, personalities, and desires. It requires the devising of plans that are feasible, desirable, and acceptable to one’s organization and partners whether joint, interagency, or multinational. Strategic leadership demands the ability to make sound, reasoned decisions specifically, consequential decisions with grave implications. Since the aim of strategy is to link ends, ways, and means, the aim of strategic leadership is to determine the ends, choose the best ways, and apply the most effective means. The strategy is the plan; strategic leadership is the thinking and decision making required to develop and effect the plan.

fail they blame others rather than taking accountability for their own actions and decisions, and that can cause anger and dissention among the people who work under the leader and that ends up hurting the organization and the future of it both it and the employees that work there. People have a tendency

As per ref (a) the United States Coast Guard defines leadership as “You influencing others to achieve a goal.” Ref (b) defines leadership as “the ability to work through others to accomplish a task.” My definition of leadership is “Things you do to get people to do things”. My definition covers both “good” and “bad” leadership. I feel that I have been influenced equally as much by “bad” leadership as “good” leadership. I have observed as much of what not to do, as what to do. I occasionally find myself compelled to do something that was in the “what not to do” column. I feel that if it was not for the bad experiences I would have had to learn a lot of the “what not to do” lessons on my own.

There are a few ways to help avoid the problems that cause leaders to make bad, uninformed decisions. In the article “Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions” they talk about raising red flags (Campbell, Whitehead, Finklestein, 2009). These are at their core just a list of ideas, if put in place that can help to make better decisions, and protect against unbiasedness, and personal motivating factors. In order to use any of them though a leader must recognize their own faults and be willing to ask for help from someone outside of their own team, and sometimes outside of their own company. If this happens then the likelihood of the leader making a bad decision falls and they at the very least have tried to make better decisions.

There are always chances and possibilities to become a good leader regardless the odds against you, gender, age, race, education, previous experience, etc. This paper defines what leadership is and it explains the relationship between leadership and influence. It also highlights the importance of finding opportunities to develop skills and creating strong to become a good leader. It is also emphasized the power of influence that comes from motivating your team, to improve performance and satisfaction and that setting a clear goal is mandatory for good leadership. The conclusion summarizes all the topics under discussion.

Traditionally, strategic decisions were thought of as "big decisions" made by general managers. However, big strategic decisions may not be the only source of competitive

When an employee of an organization feels their performance and achievements do not matter, that organization may ultimately suffer. Genuinely recognizing the value of your employees will help stop a leader from falling into the pitfalls of leadership, and having their employees enter into a dimension known as the ‘critter state”. An employee that falls into this state is known to have their ideas and skills fall short while they focus on a single question: “What will keep me safe?” (Comaford C., 2013). Below, I will explore the leadership pitfalls and how to possibly avoid them.