Does creating laws to let women join programs affect men’s opportunities? The Title IX is the law to protect the rights of any gender to participate in sports and also improve their education. In 1972, the Education of Amendments decided to create this law to let any common have the right to join and be successful. Since Title IX created laws for women to participate in education, it caused society to change men within the sport and education. The Title IX is harming men's sport and education because it causes women having more opportunity and advantage than man and eliminates the opportunities.
Letting women participate has caused the negative impact on men to have a more difficult challenging way to participate. One of the article it states
…show more content…
In one of the articles, it states that “The teams added and dropped reflect trends in men’s sports: wrestling and gymnastics teams were often dropped, while soccer, baseball, and lacrosse teams were added”(“Title IX Now 40, Still Harms Mens Sports”). This concludes that many teams in college are being eliminated by choosing the best sports that Title IX wants. The second article from a University stated that “More than 400’s men's athletic teams have been eliminated as a result of Universities needing to become NCAA Compliant”(“Title IX and its Effects on College”). This clearly states that more Universities in the U.S. are eliminating teams sports from the people who demonstrate effort and care to try to enter a sport. Bertman (coach of baseball) also agree to this effect by stating that, “Many supporters of men’s sports harbor the bitter conviction that Title IX is killing their teams, and that only political correctness prevents the world from acknowledging it”(“The Silent Enemy of Men’s sports”). Bertman is proving that a lot of teams in college are n’t enough to start off a team by the delay of Title IX. In addition, the teams also have to have a scholarship in order for them to join and play in a team, which is difficult for people to join. Colleges have its most effect on athletes from Title IX and women has the more opportunity than men which causes a fight between …show more content…
Andres Brittney wrote an article that states that “Most others will find more benign explanations; namely, that the men’s game is more fast-paced, dramatic, and thus appealing to the television and audience”(“Losing Game for Men”). From this statement that people like better watching men’s sports than women, by the action and drama they cause to get people’s attention to the game. People don’t like watching women’s sports because it isn’t the same as men. This article clearly states the effects of Title IX by stating that, “A lot of these battle’s that seem to be about Title IX is actually about men versus women and sports versus non-revenue sports”(“Title IX’s impact on Men’s Sports”). The title has its effect on men versus women and sports versus non-revenue that causes harm to men’s sports, which also destroys the limits and values of people trying to achieve. In the article “Title IX: good laws” states that, “Title IX applies to all areas of education but is best known for its influence on sports which the original law was about equality of opportunity and indeed forbade quotas or reverse discrimination schemes the government officials, college administrators and jurists spurred on by groups like the National Women’s Law Center and the Women’s Sports Foundation transformed a fair-minded equity law into just such a quota-driven regime, with destructive results”(“Title IX:
Title IX is a federal law that was passed in 1972. The law states that on one can be kept from participating in any education program or activity because of his or her sex. Before Title IX took effect, women rarely played sports at the college level, and you never saw a woman coaching a sport. It was very unheard of for colleges to have several different girls’ sports teams. The Gender Equity in Athletics and Sports acknowledges, “Before Title IX, women were 2% of the college students participating in sports” (1). Title IX gave women who wanted to be able to play sports the opportunity to do just that. Today we have thousands of women athletes at the college level, and some of them have even moved on to play sports professionally. Terrance Ross confirms, “At the collegiate level, there are currently more than 207,000 female student athletes, a 180 percent increase from the early 80s. Much of this success can be attributed to Title IX” (6). Thanks to Title IX, our daughters have a better chance to go to college and play the sport they love and to fulfill their
In cases like these, men observe the changes that are being made specifically in favor of women. By deciding that men and women should have equal opportunities, men have faced more cutbacks. Since the transition to sports, the majority of those cutbacks have involved sports. Patrick McAndrews proves this in his article by saying, “ In 2009, more men's programs have been eliminated throughout the county than ever before” (111). Since 2009, the number of male programs that have been cut has increased. This contradicts the entire purpose of Title IX. COME BACK TO
Throughout history, according to the laws of almost every country, males have been the dominate sex. In almost every sector of life, the law has granted men more rights and privileges, whether it be property rights or the right to vote. However, in the United States, ever since women’s suffrage, all women’s rights have been increasing steadily. One privilege that men have had in the past, active and supported participation in intercollegiate sports, has also been opened up to women through Title IX, part of an amendment to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Although Title IX does not solely target sports, its effect on college sports across the United States
A male on a college wrestling team posted the following "Title IX, as adumbrated by ideology-besotted Education Department regulation writers, has produced this lunacy: Colleges have killed more than 400 athletic teams in order to produce precise proportionality between men's and women's enrollments and men's and women's rates of participation in athletics. If participation in sports must mirror the sexual composition of the student body, why not participation in the engineering department? And why not in extracurricular activities other than sports?" This quotation is a perfect example of the ignorance most have when talking towards Title IX. Title IX applies to all aspects of federally funded education programs or activities, in addition to traditional educational institutions such as colleges, universities, and elementary and secondary schools. Title IX is encouraging equality around schools other than just in sports but In ALL funded programs including like debating, orchestra, and choir, cheerleading and including the engineering department.
Over two decades have passed since the enactment of Title IX, a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally funded education, including athletics. As a result of Title IX, women and girls have benefited from more athletic participation opportunities and more equitable facilities. Because of Title IX, more women have received athletic scholarships and thus opportunities for higher education that some may not have been able to afford otherwise. In addition, because of Title IX the salaries of coaches for women's teams have increased. Despite the obstacles women face in athletics, many women have led and are leading the way to gender equity.
The Effects of Title IX Opener: Title IX states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discriminate under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” Although Title 9 has helped provide opportunities, it has hurt men's athletics as well. Since Title IX, many scholarships cuts and loss of men’s sports all together have occured. A problem with Title IX is that there aren’t enough women joining intercollegiate programs to keep men’s sports alive in universities Nearly three-quarters of America’s institutions are increasing female athletic opportunities by adding sports such as lacrosse, golf, and crew.
The literature review of this article focuses on Title IX itself, as well as statistical numbers that provide the reader knowledge about the impact it has had. Title IX is a comprehensive federal law that has removed many barriers that once prevented people, on the basis of sex, from participating in educational opportunities and careers of their choice (Bower & Hums, 2013). Acosta and Carpenter (2012) reported that the number of female athletes playing college sports has risen from 16,000 in 1968 to over 200,000 in 2012. Although the increased number of opportunities has provided women the chance to participate in the sport, the percentage of women coaching women’s teams has decline over time from 90% in 1972 to 42.9% in 2012 (Acosta & Carpenter, 2012). Alongside coaching is the lack of women working in intercollegiate administration. In 1972, the percentage of female athletic directors overseeing women’s programs was 90%, Today, the percentage of female athletic directors is 20.3%, a small increase from 2010
In 1972 the Congress passed an Educational Amendment stating that all federally funded schools should not discriminate anybody by gender from playing sports. (History of Title IX. 2011, September 13). The title 9 was made to give equality to all participants who are playing for a school. Mainly for girls who were discriminated from playing sports. U.S Secretary of Education, Rod Paige said “Without a doubt, Title IX has opened the doors of opportunity for generations of women and girls to compete, to achieve, and to pursue their American Dreams. This Administration is committed to building on those successes.” (United States. Department of Education; United States. Secretary of Education 's Commission on Opportunity in Athletics, 2003, 2) Even though this law has been passed and has ensure equality to a lot of woman out there, there is still a handful of high schools that break this law. Torrey Pines High School had a women 's basketball team that went undefeated in the year of 2013. But it still showed that the boys games had more fundings than the girls team. The bleachers would be close to full every game, even though the boys team at this high school didn’t have a great season like the women 's team for this school. According to this
Imagine being a female athlete before 1972, you practice playing basketball everyday just like the boys do, but they have multiple scholarship opportunities to go to college where as females do not. They tell you to be a cheerleader or work in the kitchen and stay at home, but in your heart you are a competitor and have a passion for sports. This is a feeling that many females felt before Title IX; was explicated to give female’s gender equality in sports. Title IX has positively affected women’s sports over the years, but can negatively impact men’s teams, especially within the collegiate field. Title IX has changed budgeting and participation numbers between males and females, while opening up several opportunities for women. I am going to inform you how Title IX affects females and males in collegiate and high school sports, the history about Title IX, facts and statistics, how it has positively changed the way women participate in sports, and what it has to do with race and minorities.
While it is true that Title IX has allowed for more equality in the world of sports, some members of society do not accept it and some men consider it reverse discrimination.
While Title IX is often thought of “the women’s sports bill”, the history and progression of Title IX suggests a far more complex history. In fact, as Amanda Ross Edwards suggests, Title IX’s shift was reaction to public conflict about the bill that was spurred after the bill’s creation. The conflicts surrounding the development of Title IX suggests that debates about who should be included in educational spaces and who should be excluded from those spaces did not cease upon the Brown vs. Board of Education or after the development of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As we examine the controversy and discourse of Title IX—especially regarding women in sports—it becomes clear that the American public was still very much interested in creating
The creation of Title IX in 1972 banned gender discrimination in schools nationwide, particularly in sports (Huffman 4). Without it, superstar female athletes such as Lisa Leslie, Mia Hamm, or the Williams sisters would not be internationally famous. They also would not have the media exposure they get in sports without Title IX. In addition to the few that were just named, media is focusing more and more on female athletes such as Michelle Wie and this year's winter Olympic silver medalist in figure skating, Sasha Cowen. In conjunction with the popularity of female athletes, Title IX has pushed for equality over the past three decades. In Suzanna Huffman's article from "Mass Communication and Society," it states that "Title IX has encouraged school administrators to work toward gender equity in athletic spending, and now many more women participate in college sports and earn college athletic scholarships than in years past" (4). Although this statement is generalized, it is close to the truth in today's culture among men and women. The impact that Title IX has bestowed on women has created a positive outcome. It is astonishing to see what one document in 1972 can do to increase equality for women, yet create so many controversies with it.
Before Title IX was signed by President Nixon on June 23 and went into effect on July 1 of 1972, both women and young girls were excluded from many activities that men and young boys were allowed to do. Since the passing of Title IX, women have excelled in all sports tremendously. This essay will argue that because of Title IX, women can now participate in various activities and sports. Title IX of Educational Amendments prohibits sex discrimination in any educational program or activity receiving any type of financial aid, and because of this enactment made by Congress in 1972, women have left their mark on sports history.
In 1972 Congress passed the Educational Amendments. One section of this law, Title IX prohibits discrimination against girls and women in federally funded education, including in athletic programs. Since its arrival, in regards to athletics, there have been arguments for and against the many aspects pertaining to this law. Title IX has had a large impact on high school and college athletics in the attempt to give females an equal opportunity, but the means by which they are achieving this goal is an ongoing debate.
This past June marked the 40th anniversary of Title IX, a United States law stating that no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Although the wide spectrum in which Title IX covers includes many educational issues, its application to NCAA athletics has especially been confounded, because, unlike most educational institutions, athletic programs are gender-segregated by sport. In terms of intercollegiate athletics, Title IX essentially states that that all academic institutes of higher education are