The Effects of Deregulation on Global Economy

“For example, the federal government regulates the quality of food and water, the safety of workplaces and airspaces, and the integrity of the banking and finance system.” (Bianco, Canon 2011, p 582) Regulations find out if the product is a market failure. There are two types of regulations, which are economic and social. “Economic regulations sets prices or conditions on entry of firms into an industry, where as social regulation address issues of quality and safety.” (Bianco, Canon 2011, p 582) Economic regulations are concerned with the price regulation of monopolies.

Some challenge that the most efficient regulator is free-market competition among those seeking to attract the buying public. They argue that government regulation is intrusive with the marketplace and works to the disadvantage of both consumers and producers. Advocates of government regulation, however, see a better need to observe and guide the path of competition. They believe that an entirely unrestrained market will unavoidably lead to monopolistic practices, higher costs, underserved segments of society, and lower-quality goods and

Up until the 1880s, the United States economy followed the policy of laissez-faire (the idea that the government should have no involvement in the economy), and this led to competition which led to good prices of goods for the average consumer. However with the growth of many large companies that controlled the market, prices of goods raised due to the lack of competition. With consumers becoming frustrated and prices constantly rising, the government was forced to regulate the control of monopolies in the market.

In the late 2007, early 2008 the United States and the world was hit with the most serious economic downturn since The Great Depression in 1929. During this time the Federal Reserve played a huge role in assuring that it would not turn into the second Great Depression. In this paper, we will be discussing what the Federal Reserve did during this time including a discussion of our nation’s three main economic goals which are GDP, employment, and inflation. My goal is to describe the historic monetary and fiscal policy efforts undertaken by the U.S. Government and Federal Reserve including both the traditional and non-traditional measures to ease credit markers and stimulate the economy.

When the housing bubble came tumbling down, there were high defaults rates on the electorate and this led to the emergence of high risk borrowers (Bianco, 2008). These were people with a questionable financial history and may have lacked the sufficient means to sustain their mortgage payments and hence, went under. This occasioned massive loses to all the players in the housing sector. The worst hit was the lenders and the various investors.

In 2007, the U.S. fell into a deep financial recession. One of the main causes of this was the bursting of the housing bubble, which lead to a housing crisis. What is a housing bubble? A housing bubble is defined as “a temporary condition caused by unjustified speculation in the housing market that leads to a rapid increase in real estate prices” (businessdictionary.com 2014). When the bubble bursts, the result is a quick decline in home prices (businessdictionary.com 2014).

A free market is a type of market that the government is not involved in. Since the government does not care about what happens, the free market is also called “hands-off” or “let it be economics”. The government is limited to protect the citizens from the danger and that is the major goal for the government. In the free market economy, there are three components of the free market economy: competition, active but limited government, and the self-interest. Competition is one of the main components of the free market economy. Competition means that the companies compete with one another to make more benefits to themselves. According to the concept of the free market economy, the competition means a good thing because it is a basic

However, what many fail to realize is that some form of government regulation within a free-market economy, such as in America, is vital to its flourishment. Personally, I am in support of a free-market economy, but to an extent. The article, Faith in an Unregulated Free Market? Don’t Fall for it, stresses the importance of the presence of moderate government regulation. Without any form of regulation, “an unregulated competitive economy will inevitably spawn an immense amount of manipulation and deception” (Shiller NYT). The example is given that it is like when grocery stores put candy bars at the checkout counter; they know whining children will often force parents to make the additional purchase, providing the store with a way to draw in additional revenue. Amazingly, checkout-line items alone can draw in up to 17% additional profit for a business. With this in mind, it is the aims of the author to make his audience aware that without any regulation, “harmless” manipulation such as this may be exacerbated to a greater level. This could result in privately owned businesses charging their customers higher prices that people will have to pay because there are no governmental laws preventing them from doing so. I too believe that some form of regulation is necessary to prevent externalities like these from occurring in a free-economy. Without rules, the people within the economy

Regulation is a major activity at all levels of government. As society becomes more complex, regulations must grow and evolved to meet the demands of a developing society. Concentrating more on the role of regulation, it can be noted that it is a system that helps protect individuals from one another. So from buyers to sellers; from employee to employer; tenants to landlords, and so on. Regulations is also implemented to alleviate human suffering and promote overall welfare. For instance, aid in the form of Social Security and to Veterans, natural disaster relief, regulation of pollution and toxins, as well as temporary assistance for the unemployed. Last, and most importantly regulation is implemented to minimize and eliminate corruption and abuse of power by government agencies or officials. (Book Source) Taking into account the terms and ideologies stated above, it is easily understood why, we as individuals have decided for so many years, to abide by this social contract with our government. We gain the most benefit from this quid pro quo relationship.

In Matt Taibbi’s article “The Great American Bubble” Matt talks about the financial crisis that occurred on Wall Street. He starts his article off by giving us a little information about the highest members on Wall Street. He goes on to talk about how smart and manipulative the bank is in making money. Then he discuses the five major bubbles followed by the people of Wall Street. The bubbles were “The Great Depression, Tech Stocks, The Housing Craze, $4 a Gallon, and Rigging the Bail out” Overall the bubbles were a scheme template for Goldman employees to sell bad investments to citizens leading them broke, homeless, and in starvation. This caused the price of homes and gas to go up but people were so worried about loosing their homes, the

The idea that former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s ‘Quantitative Easing’ program deserves the credit for healing the wounds inflicted on our nation from the housing collapse of 2008 omits two possibilities: that we actually haven’t recovered, and his policies have actually laid the path for an even greater collapse ahead. The Chairman’s actions hold no precedent, he himself has even admitted to flying blind. The bond and mortgage backed security purchasing program (known as Quantitative Easing’ or just ‘QE’) creating the artificial high by re-inflating asset bubbles was the easy part. To truly follow out the process an exit strategy must be laid to liquidate the nearly ‘$4 trillion dollars’ in toxic assets the Fed now holds

Regulation can be seen as an interference with innovation and creativity. Rather than ensuring that a firm does not disobey the Acts, regulation may be responsible for the inefficiency of a firm. For example, the only individuals capable of determining the most effective and efficient methods of managing an industry are those who are active participants in it, not individuals who are not “in the loop” of managing a successful international business such as the lawmakers and politicians who enforce these acts. The only possible and sound way to determine the best move for a firm is through the wisdom gained with experience and intimate knowledge on the subject. Only then would competition within the free market be

Another key question is why do we have regulation? Regulation is meant to serve the best interest of the public. Regulation can serve the private interest, public interest or both. Almost every aspect of our daily life is regulated (as per Regulation: A Primer, page 1). Regulation is very comprehensive to the point that it extends to the moment we wake up to the moment we go back to bed at night. In the morning, there are regulations that dictate which airwaves are used by your radio station; in addition, food and drug agencies regulate the content of your toothpaste, soap,

The housing market crash, which broke out in the United States in 2007, was caused by high risk subprime mortgages. The subprime mortgage crisis resulted in a sudden reduction in money and credit availability from banks and other lending institutions, which was referred to as a “credit crunch.” The “credit crunch” and its effect spread across the United States and further on to other countries across the world. The “credit crunch” caused a collapse in the housing markets, stock markets and major financial institutions across the globe.

None of these explanations, however, is capable of fully explaining the housing bubble. From 1997 to 2006 nominal U.S. housing prices rose 188%. By mid-2009, however, housing prices had fallen by 33% from peak. As the United States attempts to rebuild its housing finance system, it is of paramount importance to understand what caused the housing bubble. Until we understand how and why the housing bubble occurred, we cannot be certain that a reconstructed housing finance system will not again produce such a devastating bubble. As you can see there are numerous theories and explanations for the bubble. Without getting too deep